Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Beijing slot left open for Chambers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 July 2008
A PLACE has been left open for Dwain Chambers in the British athletics team at next month's Olympic Games, after officials named only one 100 metres sprinter for the trip to Beijing.
Chambers, who failed a drugs test five years ago, was omitted from the list of 48 track and field athletes released yesterday by the British Olympic Association, ahead of a hearing on Thursday where the athlete will ask a judge to grant an injunction against his lifetime Olympic ban.

Victory in the National Championships at the weekend would normally have guaranteed Chambers' selection for the Olympics, but the 30-year-old is banned from representing Britain at future Games after testing positive for the steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) in 2003. The only athlete named so far in the 100m is Simeon Williamson, who finished second behind Chambers in the trials.

UK Athletics performance director Dave Collins was keen to play down the impact the Chambers issue was having, insisting Britain's sprinters were being given extra time to stake a claim for selection before this weekend's final deadline.

Collins said: "What we've done is what we've actually done in previous years and what we've done in a number of other events.

"The men's 100m, the women's 100m, the women's 800m, for example, we've got so much talent, we want to give them every chance.

"What we've done is to go for the athlete who is eligible and has made a clear case for selection – and that's Simeon.

"Of course, there are currently five other athletes at least who are in with a shout. We'll give them until midnight on the 18th, which was always the closing date for selection standards."

Collins was also keen to stress that were Chambers to win Thursday's case, he would not be made to feel a pariah on the team.

"If he's on the team, my board and my chair are already on record as saying he will be treated the same as any other athlete," Collins said.

"People don't get on with each other for a variety of reasons but we're part of the same team, we're part of Team GB.

"We're going to support each other to get the best medal haul we possibly can."

As the country's fastest sprinter, Chambers could also expect to be an automatic selection for Britain's defence of their 4x100m relay title.

But although Collins accepted the rules meant he would have to be in the squad, he claimed there was no guarantee of a place in the final four.

"If he's eligible and he's elected, he would obviously have been named in the relay," Collins said. "It doesn't mean he has to run.

"The important thing to recognise about the relay is how many different factors there are. Not wishing to be disrespectful to our four guys in Athens but, clearly, the fastest four men did not win the gold medal there."

Chambers' hearing was due to be held tomorrow, but it was put back 24 hours at the BOA's request in order to allow their chairman, Lord Moynihan, to attend.

Scottish representation in the team is at its lowest ever level, with only a single Scot named yesterday. Lee McConnell will run in the 400m, Hayley Haining is on stand-by should marathon runner Paula Radcliffe fail to prove her fitness, and Susan Scott has so far failed to convince the selectors of her claim on a place in the 1,500m.

Scotland's tally of athletes in the British team has been on the slide for decades, but just one selection marks a new low after sending five athletes to Athens four years ago.




The full article contains 614 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 July 2008 10:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: 2008 Olympics
 
1

lush,

beijing 15/07/2008 06:04:20
He's a disgrace, don't let him run for GB. I won't be cheering for him at the bird's nest in beijing thats for sure
2

Eckyboo,

15/07/2008 06:41:52
#1 I agree with you, he is a cheat and a disgrace to any sportsmen anywhere. If he runs anywhere ever again then the message sent out to our young aspiring athletes is that its okay to take drugs then after a small ban all is forgiven.
3

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

15/07/2008 07:13:36
It is pure hypocrisy by some who are signing the petition to stop him running. If they are so anti-drugs why do they have no problem being coached by known drug takers like Linford Christie?
4

Alistair Macintosh,

15/07/2008 10:55:59
If he gets to run in the Olympics then just completely open the door to drugs cheats. There is no point in having any drug taking rules.
I agree with #3, having Christie coaching is pure hypocricy.
5

porters at 9,

15/07/2008 11:31:09
#1
#2
#4
what are you havering about.. drugs are in every sport - at least chambers has admitted to it, served his punishment - he's had a ridiculous amount of drug tests since coming back and won on sunday easily - best sprinter we have - but then again you losers would rather we trailed in last because it's in the best interest in sport..

p1sh.. mistakes happen.. you should take a leaf out of his book.. bit i suppose none of you have ever made mistakes..

in fact i bet your all smack heads
6

Media 1,

cape town 15/07/2008 12:18:12
There is no way Chambers can win this case, it is near impossible.

1. The rules regarding cheating are clear and they were part of the British Olympic constitution when he decided to cheat - they still are.

2. Chambers took the drugs consciously - He knew he was attempting to cheat others out of their hard earned glory, but he didnt care, thus showing scant regard for the public, the sport and his fellow pofessionals.

3. Had also knew what the consequences were if he was caught, did he therefore take the drugs thinking to himself that if he was caught he would just challenge the British Olympic Committee and their code of conduct regarding cheats? If so he pre- meditated it, thus he should be denied any chance to compete at any event. If he did not think of the British Athletics code of conduct and his life time ban, then maybe he should have - If not for his cheating and disrespectful character we would not be having this conversation.

Chambers broke the rules and got caught, he must therefore suffer the consequences. He cannot be permitted to win this case as it will open up a door so wide it will never be closed.
But his chances of winning his case are as good as mine winning the gold for pole vault.
7

AJ Fife,

15/07/2008 12:24:44
Forget the 4 yearly athletics drugsfest, get the Saltires out for Scotland's No1!

Scotland's very own Andy Murray will be well placed to secure the Gold Medal for his beloved Caledonia!
8

Media 1,

cape town 15/07/2008 12:25:28
Porters

People like you make me sick - Chambers has NOT served his punishment in terms of the BRITISH ATHLETICS CODE OF CONDUCT..
The British Athletics Association is very clear when it comes to cheating and it stipulates that any British athlete caught taking drugs will be banned for life - that is what it says, it has always said that!
Are you now suggesting that the cheat should be permitted to challenge the code of conduct based on the mess he made for himself?
The Olympic Committee ban junkies for 2 years, the British Athletics Committee ban them for life, those are the rules and Chambers understood them before he decided to cheat the sport his fellow professionals and the public.
He has been forgiven, he made a mistake, but unfortunately he cannot run for Britain because that is the rules - end of story
9

Nell,

Far from the Struan 15/07/2008 13:12:56
Judging by the photograph accompanying the article:- Is he still on drugs?
10

AJ Fife,

15/07/2008 13:16:07
Nell,

Indeed, does he think the white line is sniffable?
11

Micropacer,

15/07/2008 13:21:31
porters at 9 your completely wrong and have made yourself look a like fool.

Yes people do make mistakes. Chambers biggest mistake after taken drugs and being caught was saying he would do the same again. He cannot be trusted and has admitted so to the BBC on camera.

Hes not just a cheat that got caught hes an idiot also. If he had been apologetic and humble the public would possibly give him a second chance - he wasnt and isnt.

Even he knew he couldnt come back to althletics after his comments hence American football etc.
12

porters at 9,

15/07/2008 13:25:03
#8 - i make you sick? do i look like your wife?
13

Media 1,

cape town 15/07/2008 16:24:06
#12 Porters

I dont know, maybe!
But the point I am making is that you are willing to allow someone to get away with cheating and that cant ever be permitted to happen.
14

Happy driver,

15/07/2008 16:40:51
#5 without the drugs would Chambers ever have developed the body which allows him to run so fast now? I don't think so which is why I thjnk he should be banned for life.

he knew the risk when he started taking them and he got caught
15

McMillar,

Fife 15/07/2008 16:46:35
Tough one.....but I'd be all for letting him take part. Life ban is out of touch.
16

Media 1,

cape town 15/07/2008 20:30:47
He is banned for life, he should not even be permitted to challenge that....He is a cheat and a liar and a deceitful cheat and the rules say you are out for life if caught.
Time served for drugs YES - Time served for cheating - LIFE
17

Run Aberdeen,

Aberdeen 15/07/2008 22:37:05
Hmmm. I am having a real problem with this. So, Chambers is to be shunned and yet tonight the news is full of accolades for Heath Ledger who appears in the new Batman movie. The guy died from a drug overdose and they are talking about giving him an Oscar. Society needs to make up its mind.
18

John PM,

Edinburgh 16/07/2008 00:13:53
Since there will be only one Scot in a team of 50 British track and field athletes I couldn't care less any more who goes or who wins. It's time for our own Olympic team.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think Scotland should have an Olympic team of its own?
Yes, it’s the only way to get Scots athletes the credit they deserve
No, Scots athletes benefit hugely from being in the British team
No, we’re part of Britain, so we should be part of the British team

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.