Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 26th November 2009

Seeing the light

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 October 2006
WHEN he caught sight of the bright red pentagon glowing above the great rose window of Rosslyn Chapel, Alan Butler almost let out a scream. At that point, he knew beyond doubt that Rosslyn was far more than just another medieval church.
By rediscovering the lightbox, forgotten for hundreds of years, Butler and John Ritchie, co-author of Rosslyn Revealed, moved closer to illuminating their theory that the truth about the chapel is even stranger than the fiction made world-famous by Dan Brown.

"It was a real Indiana Jones moment," recalls Ritchie. "Older inhabitants of Roslin village had told the story of a mysterious light which appeared in the chapel on St Matthew's Day [21 September]. But the story had been ignored by successive histories of the chapel."

While some eagle-eyed guides in the chapel had spotted the tiny window at the top of the east wall, few bothered to point it out to visitors. The tale of how Ritchie and Butler rediscovered the hidden lightbox and why it was key to understanding the chapel's secrets is told in Rosslyn Revealed, out today.

It all began when Ritchie, a resident of Roslin who has had a lifelong fascination with the chapel, discovered an old Victorian print of Rosslyn by Hill and Adamson. Taken in 1844, it shows the East wall before the Rose window was built. When he showed it to Nancy Bruce, a guide in the chapel and his second cousin, she pointed out the aperture above the window and said: "That must be where the light comes through on St Matthew's Day."

Ritchie, a former Reuters cameraman, trained a telephoto lens on the tiny opening and discovered it was in the shape of a pentagon and appeared to be lined with some sort of highly reflective material. He explains: "I thought 'we have got to test this' and went to buy a power torch." Thanks to the scaffolding currently built around the chapel to dry it out after disastrous renovation work, he was able to climb up and shine the torch through the aperture, while Butler stood in the centre aisle to see the effect. In the book, the authors describe what happened next: "At most, we expected a small glimmer of white light from the lamp to show above the East window in the comparative gloom of the chapel's interior, but we couldn't have been more wrong. Instead of the faint glimmer we had expected to appear in the lightbox, what met our eyes was a perfect orb of steady, strong, blood-red light."

Butler struggled to conceal his excitement from other visitors in the chapel, which included a Chinese film crew. "We were absolutely stunned. I made such a loud exclamation that my wife Kate, who was with me, had to shut me up. We knew at that moment that it had been deliberately created to do this and that the people who built this church were not Christians in the accepted sense of the word." The discovery delayed publication of the book until the authors had explored the implications of the mysterious lightbox. Without erecting scaffolding inside the chapel, it was not possible to get close enough to the window to find out exactly what the box was made of. Ritchie believes the red light may come from a precious gem and that the reflective sides of the pentagon are made from highly reflective mica. The shape is significant; the pentagon or its close friend, the pentagram, or five-pointed star, is a common feature in ancient civilisations - and an important symbol in Freemasonry. Many associate it with magic or satanic rituals, but it was once widely used as a symbol of Christianity, with the five corners representing the five wounds of Christ. By recreating a scale model using Perspex and mirrors, the authors managed to demonstrate that the pentagonal lightbox creates a red doughnut of light, which at a certain angle refines itself into a beam of pure white light. On 21 September, the book was at the printers, but Ritchie and Butler returned to the chapel to see if St Matthew's Light still shone in the chapel.

The pair and a few guides gathered at the back of the chapel in the early morning to see if the lightbox was still functioning. Even on a dim Autumn day, the group of witnesses saw the pentagon glowing with a strong red light. "I was absolutely stunned," says Butler. "I had to pinch myself; I thought I was having a dream. People don't find these sorts of things."

The discovery shed new light on another unusual feature of the chapel. While most medieval churches were built facing east, the precise direction was determined by the day the sun rose on the relevant saint's day [the saint to which the church was dedicated]. Rosslyn was built facing due east, although it was completed before the existence of accurate compasses.

And there was more. The position of the secret window meant the light shone through on just two days of the year - 21 March, the first day of spring, and 21 September, the autumn equinox, or beginning of winter. Ritchie says: "It is so exact that if it had been an inch either way, this phenomenon would not have happened on the day it does. That shows exactly how Rosslyn was built."

Ritchie believes the lightbox was partly obscured by the rose window created in 1871 but that before this it would have created a light which illuminated a certain point on the chapel floor. A similar phenomenon can be found at St Sulpice in Paris [also featured in The Da Vinci Code], where a light reflects along the Paris meridian at midsummer, and Chartres Cathedral. The mysterious church of Rennes le Château, source of the Templar controversy, has dancing blue lights, which appear in January.

Ritchie also believes the light also has a correlation with the chapel's founder William Sinclair, whose name translates as Holy Light.

For Butler, an expert on stone circles, megalithic structures and astro-archeology, the discovery of the lightbox is confirmation the chapel's roots are in beliefs which predated Christianity by thousands of years. Both authors believe the rediscovery of the lightbox is a key to unlocking the true meaning of Rosslyn Chapel. Butler says: "In a way, this goes back to pre-Christian beliefs, to sun worship. It shows Rosslyn is unlike any other church in the world - in effect it is a medieval stone circle."

The full significance of the way Rosslyn was aligned on a true east-west axis before the existence of accurate compasses has still to be explored - but it fits with Ritchie and Butler's belief that Gilbert Haye and William Sinclair, who built the chapel, were masters of astrology. Unlike any other church, the inside of Rosslyn Chapel was once fitted with shutters, suggesting it may have been used as a secret observatory.

The authors also believe the foundation stone for the chapel was laid on the day of a rare conjunction between Venus and the Sun which is associated with the Shekinah, the female aspect of God. The hidden window may have been used as a way of measuring the movements of the planets, particularly of Venus. And, if the authors' experiments are correct, the light the secret window projected on to the back of the chapel casts a shape remarkably similar to the Eye of Horus, the all-seeing symbol of Freemasonry.

Even a person looking at Rosslyn Chapel with an untrained eye can see aspects unusual for a Christian church. The roof is sprinkled with roses and stars, and there are more Green Men - symbols of paganism - than any other church in the world. Carvings in the chapel encompass symbols of Judaism, Hinduism, Islam - and encompass the nature and sun worship of the earliest human religions.

The authors are certain there is much more to discover about the secrets of chapel. After almost a decade of research for the book, Ritchie says: "We feel as if we have only written the introduction."

• Rosslyn Revealed by Alan Butler and John Ritchie is published by O Books at £19.95.

Ebionites who harboured a Pope's son


THE conventional story of Rosslyn Chapel says Earl William Sinclair created it in the woods to thank God for a long and prosperous life. But John Ritchie and Alan Butler believe Gilbert Hay, listed in histories as "tutor to the Sinclair children," was key to the creation of the chapel.

The authors believe Sinclair and Hay were Ebionites, followers of a pre-Christian mystery tradition which had survived since biblical times.

Previously, Hay had been an adviser at the French court, personally knighted by the King of France and a confidant of French duke Rene D'Anjou. Hay was one of the most educated men in Europe and, while at Rosslyn, assembled one of the world's great libraries.

Ritchie and Butler believe Hay's real motive in settling at Rosslyn was to supervise the building of the chapel, which, far from being a conventional Christian church, enshrined the beliefs of the Ebionite sect. The Ebionites, who denied the divinity of Jesus and exalted John the Baptist, were persecuted and outlawed under the Inquisition. But they still had powerful friends, including Pope Pius II, below, who before becoming pontiff travelled on a secret mission to Scotland.

As a diplomat, the future pope fathered an illegitimate child, which, according to expert historians, he left with Sinclair to raise as his own.

Having friends in high places was just one of the reasons Sinclair and Hay were left alone to fill their chapel with symbolism wildly different from that of the orthodox Christian Church.

As Ebionites, their beliefs were a fusion of Pantheism, Persian dualism and Judaism. The feminine principle was acknowledged alongside the masculine and the individual was encouraged to have his or her own experience of God.

Look around Rosslyn Chapel and the evidence is there, in the carvings of feminine symbols of roses, in the portrayals of the Veil of Veronica, the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene.

In Rosslyn Revealed, Ritchie and Butler argue the Sinclair family, who are often taken to have been Knights Templar, were, in fact, Ebionites.

They ask: "Could it be possible Earl William Sinclair was a member of a family that had maintained its Ebionite, Jewish roots across 1,400 years of history?"

The evidence presented by Rosslyn Chapel seemed to indicate this could indeed be the case.

Factfile


• Rosslyn Chapel was built between 1456 and 1496. Master masons came from all over the world to build it.

• The chapel has attracted some illustrious visitors over the years, including Sir Walter Scott, Dorothy Wordsworth, Queen Victoria, Robert Burns, Samuel Johnson, JMW Turner and Mary Queen of Scots. More recently, Michael Bentine, one of the original Goons, was a great enthusiast. He was a keen dowser and convinced Rosslyn was the centre of an unusually strong energy field. Rosslyn Revealed is dedicated to Bentine, below, while another unlikely expert is Rat Scabies, drummer with punk band The Damned. He wrote Rat Scabies and the Holy Grail with a journalist friend.

• In the 1560s a mob fuelled by John Knox and hatred of idolatry marched on the chapel to destroy it, but it was saved by local man Thomas Cochrane, who diverted the mob to Rosslyn Castle and its cellars of fine wine.

• The restoration in 1871 by the 4th Earl of Rosslyn was inspired by Queen Victoria. She was seduced by the chapel and appalled by its state of disrepair.

• The chapel is covered by a canopy and scaffolding, a result of disastrous repair work in the 50s. The inside of the chapel was coated in cement and became waterlogged. Rosslyn Chapel Trust, chaired by the current Earl, has applied for £11m of public money to restore the chapel.

• Some claim to have counted 110 green men in the chapel, as well as one highly unusual green woman. The men of the woods, with foliage emerging from the corners of their mouths, are an ancient symbol of man's interdependence with the natural world, and are also found in Hinduism.

• In The Lay of the Last Minstrel, Sir Walter Scott told the legend of the glowing red light which is said to emanate from the chapel when one of the Sinclairs is close to death. "O'er Roslin all that dreary night, a wondrous blaze was seen to gleam; 'twas broader than the watch-fire's light, And redder than the bright moonbeam."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 October 2006 8:51 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Rosslyn Chapel
 
1

Bram Seer,

Embra 27/10/2006 11:50:12

This is amazing stuff,the truth is stranger than Fiction, Dan Brown eat your heart out,the real treasure is in Scotland at Rosslyn.

2

Huguenot,

28/10/2006 16:58:46

Astonishing as rediscovery of the architectural feature is, this article contains witless rubbish.

Alignment of the structure "before the existence of accurate compasses" is hardly remarkable as their alignment is magnetic rather than celestial. Alignment by celestial observation is so established in millenia that its origins may be considered shrouded in common human heritage.

More pertinent than any mastery of astrology for the alignment of the chapel are Hay and Sinclair's technical skills in what is now called entirely separately astronomy, completely sufficient. Both deal with celestial positionings, but are otherwise completely -- one might even say poles -- different. So, any "full significance of the way Rosslyn was aligned on a true east-west axis before the existence of accurate compasses" still having to be explored is spurious, more pertinent to selling paper and ink than imparting knowledge.

Even the existence of "accurate compasses" is spurious and irrelevant; directions were already determinable (unless the site may have been in perpetual fog, as it may be increasingly coming amid growing sensationalist faddism from Dan Brown and his ilk of minions of scholarship). There is, simply, no further "full significance of" alignment "to be explored."

Similarly conjecture on the Ebionite connection ... The name comes from the Hebrew for "poor," reflected in Romans 15:26 and 1 Corinthians 16:3. Among all the attempts in the 1. and 2. Cc. CE or so to come to understand who Jesus was, the Ebionites' may be regarded as those of a continuing yeshivah of talmidim of Jesus and John as rebbes. In this they are typically regarded, as the article indicates in fact denying Jesus' divinity, at contrast with the Docetists, who maintained that Jesus was God and merely appeared to be human.

To say that the Ebionites were "followers of pre-Christian mystery tra

3

Huguenot,

28/10/2006 23:52:17

[in continuation Huguenot #3 and conclusion]

Similarly hardly journalism of the standard I expect from the Scotsman is the assertion “Shekinah, the female aspect of God.”

The biblical Hebrew word “shekhinah” in its most urtextual, original, basic, and immediate sense signifies “dwelling,” nothing more nor less than “the presence of God,” not the insinuation of the article as “the female aspect of God.” As an Orthodox Jewish friend once commented in good terms to a Gentile acquaintance, “If you are going to use the language at least get it right” (cf. Wittgenstein’s belauded from related background, “What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent” and reflect on pertinence to effusions in public media). In this basic sense one might without much particular metaphor refer to one’s residence as “shekhinah,” similarly where the Baptist’s two disciples ask Jesus where he is staying (John 1:38). That the word “shekhinah”is grammatically feminine, as reflected in its “-ah” ending, is principally completely unrelated to imputation of gender in meaning, as generally prevailing in grammatical gender in languages generally. Mark Twain’s comment about German as a language in which the word for girl is neuter and for turnip feminine comes to mind.

To assert, as some kabbalists, shekhinah as the feminine principle or the female aspect of God, with whatever merits, is later accretion.

The mob whipped up by John Knox may have gotten the matter about right theologically, but everyone knows of course that they were gluttons and drunkards (Matthew 11:19, Luke 7:34, Titus 1:12) and so the gem was saved architecturally. But at least the booze, contravening, was good, and some might even hold well worth the sacrifice for all parties, and with a good time being had by all.

For The Myths & Mysteries lead-on tag to opine that Butler & Richie’s <<Rosslyn Revealed>> “contains

4

Bram Seer,

The whole of Scotland 29/10/2006 14:03:16

Hugeuenot perhaps you should read the book,before passing judgement, instead of basing all your assumptions on the article....after all the authors Butler and Ritchie did not write the article they wrote the book......I am looking forward to reading it before make any decisions....

5

Huguenot,

29/10/2006 22:27:28

Bram Seer #5: Perhaps you should read Smith's review article before assessing my posting, and perhaps read the posting again as well, beginning with its acknowledgment that rediscovery of the light box is, in fact (which I neither did nor do challenge), astonishing, followed by the observation that "this article [sic, non liber] contains witless rubbish."

The book as well may contain "witless rubbish" but that is another issue, another day, another race, and none of now or my making.

Whatever the merits of the book in faithfulness to the evidence to which Smith reports it as appealiing, or Smith's faithfulness to the book in reporting its case and representations, the issues which I see from the article -- whether from the book -- are unchanged, and it is upon them, not from my injection of assumptions, I base my comments.

You of course assume that I have not read the book, and you may be correct.

You are presumably correct to observe that Butler and Richie did not write the article. You are not however correct to infer and insinuate that my comments constitute "passing judgement." However, before the Scotsman (which presumably has in some sense read the book, at least through its agency of C. Smith and perhaps that of CS's supervising editor if no other way) verges on sensationalism with such prejudicial ejaculations as “contains claims which will shake both the Christian church and Freemasonry,” perhaps it would do well to have its support better prepared before taking them to press.

I neither have obligation to acquit nor predisposition to condemn the book unread. What I point out are issues evident from the article on which the book as represented, whether read, may be questioned.

If the Smith review is not accurate representation of the book, then perhaps there are some discussions to go on among Smith, the Scotsman's editors and management, Richie, Butler, their publisher, and th

6

Explorer,

longniddry 15/12/2007 16:34:52
This is a gripping story and a great article but, unfortunately, the triangle of red stained glass was only inserted in Rosslyn Chapel's East Window in the 186os when the Earl of Rosslyn restored the Chapel's windows. Prior to that there were lozenge-shaped lead windows, while two Hill and Adamson paper negatives (now in Glasgow University's Archives) show that in the 1840s there was no glass at all in the East Window and that the stone tracery was totally different to what it is today, with no triangle whatsoever. More important than Sir Gilbert Haye was Fr Richard Augustine Hay, whose voluminous writings can be consulted in manuscript at the National Library of Scotland. Almost everything we know today about Rosslyn Chapel and the St Clair family comes from his transcriptions of now-lost family charters - apart from the one that came up for sale on Ebay a few months ago! The charters he transcribed prove that everything the St Clair family did was done quite openly with the knowledge of the King and the great officers of state, many of whom witnessed the signing of the charters. The St Clairs could not afford to get up to any alternative religious practices as the King would undoubtedly have had them executed! The connection between Rosslyn chapel and Freemasonry also began in the 1860s when the Earl of Rosslyn and architect David Bryce were replacing carvings in the Lady Chapel that had decayed beyond recognition. This is when the popular 'Masonic' carvings were inserted. As for the Templar connection - Knights Templar belonged to a religious order - they had to swear an oath of poverty, chastity and obedience to the order's Rule. Most of the St Clair's were married, most were rich and none obeyed any Rule set down by a religious order. The St Clairs were not Knights Templar but Crusaders. The full story is in my recently-published book, 'Rosslyn Chapel Revealed' (Sutton Publishing Ltd.)
7

Herne the Hunter,

All of Scotland 14/12/2008 17:04:05
Explorer you should get your facts right. Sir Gilbert Haye influenced many important Scottish Scholars and poets including Lindsay,he also edited the Scotichronicon,indeed he was at university with Walter Bower,he was said to be one of the greatest scholars of his age.
Augustus Hay on the other hand was a toadying little priest who stole books from Newbattle Abbey,including most of the annals. He made up a partially fictional history of the Sinclairs to glorify them, and his self. Father Hay was a relative and on their payroll.
I have read your book and find very little new research in it indeed you get the feeling that you wandered off the subject and covered many other things in Midlothian,because you had run out of things to say about the Chapel,a pretty poor book with lots of nice pictures. Whereas Rosslyn Revealed by Butler and Ritchie is an in-depth well researched book which has brought our lots of new material about the chapel and its carvings. A normal Catholic Chapel it never was,but your religion would never allow you to think anything else. Was your book not commissioned by the Catholic church in order to try and destroy the Dan Brown Myths? I do believe it was,well it did not do a very good job,the Church should ask for its money back.
I see a modern parallel emerging here,just like Gilbert Haye and Father Hay.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.