Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City 'nothing to fear from Unesco threat' says design guru



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 September 2008
EDINBURGH'S controversial design champion has intervened for the first time in the debate over the capital's world heritage status – insisting the city has "nothing to fear" from a Unesco investigation.
Sir Terry Farrell said he was "relaxed" about the massive Caltongate and Haymarket developments recently given the go-ahead by the city council, despite fears they will see Edinburgh stripped of its title.

With one leading architect branding Unes
co the "conservation mafia" and another dubbing the city heritage group the Cockburn Association "toxic", Sir Terry has pleaded for calm.

But he expressed growing concerns about how Princes Street will look once trams are introduced and urged the Scottish Government to review the case for extra funding, it being ruled out only last week.

Sir Terry has called for a complete traffic ban from the thoroughfare, other than trams, and three major pedestrian-friendly areas – at the West End, the foot of The Mound and outside the Balmoral Hotel – to help transform Princes Street.

The appointment of Sir Terry, the masterplanner for Edinburgh's financial district, was unveiled four years ago by the council, but he has been criticised for a lack of achievement in the role.

Malcolm Fraser, one of the Caltongate architects, has accused Sir Terry of fronting a "design leadership circus". Mr Fraser said: "Without power or a defined role, Farrell and Ricardo Marini (Sir Terry's deputy] resort to grandstanding their design leadership status, adding to our confusion and leaving practices like mine unable to point to a single positive outcome."

Mr Fraser accused the Cockburn Association of leading a "toxic" wing of the heritage lobby in the city, adding: "There are significant sections (of the lobby] that forget it is architects and mastermasons, and not them, that have led the conception of adornment of this breathtaking city."

Meanwhile Richard Murphy, who has designed the 17-storey hotel at Haymarket, turned the temperature up even further. Referring to the recent visit of Unesco director-general, Koichiro Matsuura, Mr Murphy branded his organisation a "conservation mafia", adding: "I suspect that this whole Unesco relationship is a cosy little club."

However Sir Terry has defended the architects insisting Edinburgh should not be too concerned about the forthcoming visit by Unesco inspectors.

He said: "They're looking at Edinburgh as they would any other capital city. We have nothing to fear. We have good architects working in the city and I'm relaxed about the developments that have been approved. It has to be taken in context. Edinburgh is a living, working city."



The full article contains 429 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 September 2008 12:55 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Architecture
 
1

Kate,

Zurich 03/09/2008 07:04:45
A singularly arrogant attitude!
2

Amenemhat,

03/09/2008 09:13:43
.....From all involved
3

Buttress,

03/09/2008 09:22:55
Well, I heard him on radio last week and in context, much of this wasn't actually what Sir Terry said. This article really is selectively quoting. He didn't seem too happy about the lack of masterplanning for developments either.

He did state that more funding for the WHS should be forthcoming, and as it was so importnat it should come from central government. Edinburgh World Heritage Trust funding is in grave danger of being slashed by CEC. Not great.

Actually UNESCO is looking at Edinburgh (and Bath) - not as any other city, but as World Heritage Sites where concern was raised at the UNESCO international conference in July. UNESCO should have been informed about a development the size of Caltongate early in the planning process - and wasn't. It's also coming to see what effect the proposals for St James' Centre and Leith Docks will have.

No, it's not likely that the city will be instantly stripped of its World Heritage Site status, it's not how UNESCO works, but nor should anyone be complacent until issues are resolved regarding demolitions, developments and more stringent policies are in place to protect the city and its skyline.

As far as the rest of this article goes - is Mr Ferguson short on news? The Fraser stuff - possibly Fraser himself is the toxic one, and as for Murphy - his statements (as reported in this week's Building Design) seemed to be based on a great deal of misunderstanding.

The truth is that these architects make large sums of cash by working hand in glove with developers. So of course they need to carry on working with developers in order to keep their businesses going. It's useful for them to denigrate heritage groups.

The Building Design article has a great many comments under which puts things in perspective:

http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=426&storycode=3121300&c=1



Joanna Blythman in the Sunday Herald had it about right:

http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2436904.0.0.php
4

Buttress,

03/09/2008 09:23:47

"Unfortunately in recent years Edinburgh has been plagued by councillors who, though their politics differ, have one thing in common - their egos are bigger than their brains and their judgement is wanting. Puffed up and romanced by developers and modernist architects who feed them the pretentious, self-aggrandising vocabulary of "iconic buildings", "signature architecture", "architectural statements" and "iconoclastic, brave development" - like teenage vandals carving their initials on the ancient stones of the Acropolis - they yearn to leave their hubristic mark on the city for posterity. Hence the spate of fatally misconceived plans that are being given the go-ahead, even though they perpetuate old mistakes and grind their killer heels in the face of Edinburgh's handsome heritage."

Links to the full articles can be got via:

www.eh8.org.uk


and the blog, updated frequently.


5

Buttress,

03/09/2008 09:28:50
And as for Richard Murphy of the Haymarket Tower:

"Then there's the scandal of Caltongate, where two listed buildings on the historic Royal Mile are to be demolished to make way for a five-star hotel and conference centre - as if Edinburgh needs another. But the most monstrously inappropriate scheme yet given approval is the 17-storey (yes, that's right, 17-storey!) hotel and office development at Haymarket. This has been sold by its promoters as "a gateway of blade-like sharpness in the form of a tower" that will "act as a beacon at night" and function as "a gateway building marking the entry into the World Heritage Site from the west". What preposterous and fanciful nonsense.

I happen to agree, on the whole, with Leon Krier, guru of the New Urbanism school of architecture, who said that "the most beautiful and pleasant cities which survive in the world today have all been conceived with buildings of between two and five floors". Even those who go for all that "street in the sky" rhetoric spouted by ideologues of modernism ought to admit that Edinburgh is not Manhattan. However bored architects may be with working in the confines of a conservation-minded city, a philistine should see that 17 storeys are brazenly out of scale among Edinburgh's traditionally low-rise buildings.

It's hard to see Haymarket's proposed tower as anything other than a grotesquely super-sized, overbearing monument to architectural arrogance and civic stupidity. Worse, I interpret it as a declaration that it is now open season on Edinburgh's outstanding urban heritage, one that ratifies the Caltongate precedent. Former Lord Provost Lesley Hinds betrayed a rare flash of self-doubt after the Haymarket decision when she remarked that "we will be damned or we might be congratulated in the future". I'll place my bet now. The Haymarket tower will be viewed as Edinburgh's biggest post-St James Centre planning gaffe and those who voted for it as dangerous idiots."



6

Seb,

Edinburgh 03/09/2008 10:28:36
Well Buttress, here's a response to make you apoplectic...
http://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/edinburgh_world_heritage_status.htm
7

Buttress,

03/09/2008 10:47:35
No I don't go in for apoplexy, I have read it already, and laughed.


Who, by the way, is Paul Tanner?

I know who Adam Wilkinson is...


8

Buttress,

03/09/2008 10:51:36
http://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/edinburgh_world_heritage_site.htm


Frankly, I'm on the side of world heritage.


9

Buttress,

03/09/2008 11:06:51
I'm still laughing. Poor Paul Tanner, whoever he may be. Bet he sweated all weekend to write that.


Meanwhile back in the world of those who actually think Edinburgh a special place, worthy of World Heritage Site status and proud of it, try this:

http://www.visitscotland.com/guide/scotland-factfile/arts-culture/literature/edinburgh-stories/
10

Buttress,

03/09/2008 11:26:22
And:

http://www.ewht.org.uk/Home.aspx
11

Seb,

Edinburgh 03/09/2008 11:41:35
To be frank, I love Edinburgh and have actively campaigned against a number of these projects but I don't give a fig for World Heritage Status. It has no statutory power and the forever threat of loosing the status is a red herring that distracts from the reality.

Caltongate is bad because it tramples on the local community's wants/needs, it's a developer lead landgrab and the architecture is below parr. I don't care what a cabal of international conservationists think, but I do care what local people think. No matter how much UNESCO thin their lips they can't control the outcomes of the hobbled democratic process that is our blighted planning system.

It must also be said that ICOMOS played no part in the battle against Caltongate until the very last moment, leaving the lone star at EWHT to fight it. It rankles that AFTER the decision is made they start tut tutting when they've neglected to get involved for the previous 3 years of consultation.

12

Buttress,

03/09/2008 12:01:59

Terry Farrell on Edinburgh
Edinburgh's design champion Sir Terry Farrell told BBC Scotland: "Edinburgh is changing, it is becoming a bigger city in every sense, it's being recognised as a force in urban cities in Europe and in Great Britain.
"It also has the tram and the waterfront, these are big changes. The changes aren't being welded together, the resources aren't there to do it, it's reactive, we are looking at each of the piecemeal bits and saying whether we like them or not. My view is this investment should partly come from central government, I don't think it is putting enough into what is Scotland's greatest city."



I would suggest the threat is more hyped in the press than the reality. However, there is a threat that places could be put on the At Risk list until issues are sorted out.

I do care about World Heritage Site Status. I think that it is something worthwhile, and not simply because of tourism revenue. I also think you have some skewed views about several things, but that's up to you.

ICOMOS and Caltongate: (Feb 2008)

http://www.icomos-uk.org.boilerhousedesign.co.uk/news/?id=105


Actually, I would suggest that UNESCO isn't toothless. It has got the UK government actually looking actively at how it protects WHS in legislation - very late in the day, but better than nothing. UNESCO works quietly.

And although EWH objected throughout (brave considering who sponsors it... ) it wasn't alone.
13

mad moo,

edinburgh 03/09/2008 12:19:10
I agree with Seb that the Caltongate plans are awful for more reasons than just the concerns over WHS, although I do think the WHS is important to Edinburgh not only because of it's architectural quality but it is a cultural capital city.
Edinburgh's councillors have been sold a pig in a poke with this rubbish scheme and are failing to support the people who voted them in to get rid of the sleeze and lies peddled by the previous administration.
Interesting that Terry Farrell wants Princes st pedestrianised and like so many before him thinks Princes St is priority over anything else. His financial district is what set the tone for Fountainbridge and now we have rubbish council HQ (Waverley Court) setting the tone for development in the Old Town.
Need to stop the rot now. Communities and urbanists have been calling for pedestrianisation of the Old Town for years. lets have some joined up thinking for the city for a change.

the Old town needs more housing, pedestrian streets, small interesting PUBLIC spaces, Princes St needs investment to raise the quality of shops, is on a tram route so perfect for tourist accommodation, and has lots of empty floors above street level with stunning views, again perfect for tourist accommodation both 5* and maybe serviced appartments.

these 2 areas of the city should then be able to complement each other and visitors would be able to see why this city is a WHS
14

mad moo,

edinburgh 03/09/2008 12:25:34
Biggest Problem with the likes of Caltongate is the dodgy sell off of Common Good Land.

If the land had been declared surplus TO THE PUBLIC the community could have worked with the council to create a REAL masterplan for the area instead of secretly offering it to a London developer who has employed a second rate architect(experienced in USA style office development) to draft a commercially driven proposal to provide a quick short term profit for the developer.

The most unsustainable plan to be seen in this city yet!
15

Buttress,

03/09/2008 12:42:11
I don't like the sell off of a listed building for demolition - and the facade scheme for others. Very, very bad conservation. But of course the developers don't care, they simply want a larger site.

The idea put about by the devloper and architects that it's a good idea to demolish the Canongate Venture and build something modern and ugly simply becaue it responds better to the new council building - well, frankly, anyone who belives that must be stupid.

But this denigration of the World Heritage Site status is of coures a joy for developers, who I am sure are behind a certain amount of it - next they will be lobbying via the PR companies who seem to have control of certain sectors of the press (and of course the Chamber of Commerce - which is closely involved with the Caltongate developers Mountgange) to remove the restrictions of conservation areas and grade A listing. Well, it makes making a fast buck even harder for them.
16

Seb,

03/09/2008 12:43:15
Some of my views are indeed skewed but I try to keep those practises private...

I wasn't suggesting that EWHT objected alone but that it was a lone star within EWHT that fought to be permitted to object along with the other amenity groups. The ICOMOS statement came far too late as it should have objected to the masterplan. That's what's agravating about it now weighing when the rest of us percieved the poor quality of the proposals at a much earlier stage. I sat at meetings in January where the representative of ICOMOS behaved as if they were the first to take up the cudgel and they implied that EWHT and the Cockburn had been tardy.

Anyhoo, this will no doubt rumble on forever.
17

Buttress,

03/09/2008 12:52:55
Well, maybe EWH funding cuts is because it objected? Don't rock the boat?

Not sure that objecting to anything by anyone would have made much difference - Caltongate has been described as Trevor (The Finger) Davies' Vanity Project and I think that's possibly very true.

So much of the planning was simply carefully manipulated in order that dissent wasn't allowed to be heard.

As with so much else - I listened to Terry Farrell last week, in fact listened several times, and if this is what Brian Ferguson thinks he said I think that either he's wrong or I am. But I have checked with others who feel this article maybe had been better left unwritten!
18

Studio Space,

Scotland 03/09/2008 14:47:55
Edinburgh World Heritage Recruit New Members

http://www.architecturescotland.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1001
19

Buttress,

03/09/2008 15:07:20
Oh, is that old Dunlop article being resurrected again!

Another laughable and inaccurate and very ignorant piece, by another who makes a great deal of cash out of working with developers.

"Cities are living organisms. They need to change and to adapt to different times. It is inherently dangerous to gift their development to small coteries..." Oh I think we all agree Mr Dunlop.


He doesn't agree with listing buildings either.

Still, no worry with any of yours in future, ah?

It's fun to see the stew some are getting themselves in over the fact the cosy little cabal of architects with egos, developers and the council is being closely scrutinised and criticised.

Well they must know best what is good for us, Eh? The folk who gave you the St James' Centre... and are trying to foist Caltongate on you...

Actually in reality that pic is about EWH opening its doors to families, more than two thousand people enjoyed seeing inside Charlotte Square at Doors Open Day last year...

Not the Director in that pic either, but hey, who needs accuracy?

http://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/edinburgh_world_heritage_site.htm

Doors Open Day:

http://www.ewht.org.uk/Doors-Open-Day---Saturday-27-September.aspx

Have fun. Take the kids. Let them appreciate true architectural genius.
20

Buttress,

03/09/2008 15:12:21
5 Charlotte Square
Open: 10.00am to 5.00pm 27th September

Learn about Robert Adam’s finest piece of architecture, and find out about the lives of the grand residents and servants of Charlotte Square. Children can join in with making fans and calling cards, or dress up as a Georgian gentleman or lady.

How do you organise a rout in your own home? Join Mr & Mrs Grant for some essential tips on Georgian manners.

Presentations at 11am, 12pm, 2pm, and 3pm last 20 minutes, and are suitable for all the family.



James Craig House
Open: 11am – 4pm

This extraordinary house is one of the few surviving buildings designed by James Craig, famous for his plan for the first New Town, and recent significant restoration of the building enables it to be opened for the first time.

The building dates to 1776 and was intended as an observatory, on the advice of Robert Adam it was designed in a gothic style to match the castle. The plan proved to be too expensive, and instead it became home to the assistant astronomer royal.

There will also be an opportunity to find out more about the restoration of some of the monuments on Calton Hill as part of the Twelve Monuments Project, and to meet some of the conservation specialists who are involved in the work.



21

Buttress,

03/09/2008 15:29:27
"Edinburgh – from world heritage site to Basildon of the north?"


http://news.scotsman.com/opinion/Edinburgh--from-world-heritage.4451387.jp#3193711

Chris Harvey MSP


"Only a collective failure of taste can explain the total nullity of the Caltongate scheme, a Basildon clone promoted by the English developer Mountgrange: something even the council can defend only on the grounds that "it will attract investment". Designed by and for David Brent would sum it up."
22

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 03/09/2008 19:33:17
Sir Terry isn't getting any praise in my book for bringing some of the most ugly stuff to Edinburgh. Time was when I couldn't wait until my yearly (sometimes twice yearly) trips to Edinburgh but since the buidling of the ugly parliament buidling and wha t will happen to Calton, etc. it won't be the same. The so called improvemen ts and modern izing is bound to make Unesco change attitude townards Edinburgh. I know I have. A beautiful city , with beautiful buildings should be conserved for future historians and people who just plain love those wonderful, graceful buildings. Re-habbing and conservation is what should be done rather than ruin a city. This destroying your heritage is just rape!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.