Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009

Waterfront to set sail as city harbours £50m loan scheme

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 May 2009
A FRESH £50 million plan to kickstart development on Edinburgh's Waterfront by building new roads, piers and esplanades has been unveiled.
The scheme would see the council borrow the money against a projected increase in business rates paid by firms lured to the Waterfront.

Officials estimate around £459m of infrastructure work – including the shelved Granton to Roseburn tram line, new roads and sewerage – is needed to bring the Waterfront up to scratch.

Among the initial projects planned for the £50m injection are:

• A new Easter Harbour Road to connect from the bottom of Constitution Street to Seafield Road.

• A new pier for the Royal Yacht Britannia and visiting cruise ships.

• New lock gates on Leith Docks to accommodate cross-Forth passenger ferries.

• A new esplanade along Leith Docks to complement a new marina development.

Land values around the Waterfront have fallen by around 60 per cent over the last two years with many housebuilding and office projects shelved.

But a study commissioned by the council estimates that the "tax increment financing" scheme, popular in the United States but untested in the UK, could bank £311m in new business rates over the next 25 years.

Council chiefs need UK Government backing for the scheme, not least to help cover the financial risks of no firms actually moving to the Waterfront, but it is hoped the £50m project will be put out to tender next year with work getting under way in 2011.

City leaders today described the plans as "prudent and workable" and said putting the Waterfront's infrastructure in first will stimulate investment in the area.

Opposition politicians gave it a cautious welcome, but raised concerns about the levels of debt the council could be saddled with.

Dave Anderson, the council's director of city development, unveiled details of the borrowing plan while giving evidence to the House of Commons all-party committee on urban development.

He said: "The fundamental strengths of Edinburgh's economy remain in place despite the impact of the recession and the challenges facing the city's financial services sector

"By seeking to raise only £50m from potential incremental tax flows of £311m, we believe this approach is prudent and workable."

The council plan would also involve creating a temporary 'business rates-free zone' in the Waterfront to encourage firms to initially move there, with officials insisting restrictions would be put in place to stop firms moving to the new zones just to avoid rates.

Edinburgh is competing with a number of English cities to become a Government-backed "accelerated development zone" which would have the tax increment financing powers.

Councillor Cameron Rose, the city's Tory finance spokesman, said: "We are certainly in favour of exploring this idea, getting more detail on how it would work and if there is much market interest.

"But no matter which way you dress it up, it is still debt and there has to be concerns about how exposed the council would be under these arrangements."


The full article contains 506 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 May 2009 10:39 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Architecture
 
1

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 16/05/2009 12:11:28
The council will borrow 50million,guess who will end up paying for that trash.
2

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 12:13:46
This 'story' - more than likely the usual re-hashing of a cooncil press release - is just a kite-flying wish list scribbled on the back of a broon-envelope. So-called 'City leaders' would be as well writing a letter to Santa.
3

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 12:27:22
If much of this wishlist ever materialises, which seems unlikely, then it does mean a certain amount of risk. The bigger risk though may be doing nothing and the city stagnates when the current recession ends, rather than booming as it has done in recent years - so it is certainly an idea worth exploring.
4

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 16/05/2009 12:38:13
They should create a Duty Free zone in the port that would attract more businesses look to rotterdam for the model it works there.
5

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 12:40:35
Well, the Council has already borrowed £14m for its contribution to the tram line and will probably need to borrow, at least £20m more just for that. Add to that another £50m for the Waterfront and that is getting to a serious level of debt.

Do schools, sports facilities, and other socially desirable projects not matter any more?

6

toby,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 12:41:18
The Council should be ashamed to propose buying the GPO building at £100m, put money up for the above project yet refuse to take a realistic stance of how much is put into building homes to RENT..... Stop talking about affordable homes under the pretext of being available to rent. There will be very few for affordable RENT.

7

The Judge,

16/05/2009 12:44:22
Borrowing money against business rates from companies that don't exist in the middle of an economic depression sound very risky. Maybe they should get Fred the Shred to check the figures?
8

Derts n telly ya basta,

16/05/2009 12:58:50
Leith should secede from Edinburgh rule and legalise cannabis.
9

Buttress,

16/05/2009 13:41:04
"Council chiefs need UK Government backing for the scheme, not least to help cover the financial risks of no firms actually moving to the Waterfront..." quite.

The council can't even pull in its bad debts!

See:-

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Caltongate-failure-set-to-free.5274268.jp#4032993

10

SlyFifer,

Somewhere South of Fife 16/05/2009 14:14:28
In no other major/capital city that I can think of is the waterfront so underutilised and drab. In some river/waterfront cities the riverside properties are the most desirable in the city and command prices accordingly.
I have recently arrived back in Edinburgh after living some years in the US. The utterly aweful quality of the new developments that litter the waterfront are a disgrace to the city and very much in line with the long term dumbing down of the city (including Leith).
The city needs a new vision, much in keeping with the visionaries of the 18th century who left us with a world heritage city of stunning architecture. Sadly, nothing like that in Leith. Awful buildings, awful infrastructure, congestion and filth. What a legacy !.
11

tomias,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 14:34:49
And god bless all who sail and go down with her.
12

Statsman,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 14:44:39
Could the council please stop gambling with taxpayers' money?

The Waterfront might not be viable for another 20 years. This is a huge gamble. People don't want to be handed Council Tax bills for several thousand pounds to massage the egos of politicians and officials.
13

Euan,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 16:57:25
This is an incredibly worrying gamble by the council.

There is no doubt that at some point development at the Waterfront will start to pick up, but is the council not overlooking something here?

Their oh-so-lovely tram project is currently running around one year and tens of millions of pounds behind schedule. If they are borrowing £50 million to try and kick-start development at the Waterfront, just where exactly do they expect the huge cost over-runs for the trams to come from?!

Meanwhile, the rest of Scotland's capital city continues to suffer with yet more cuts in services and amenities...


14

jdships,

Edinburgh 16/05/2009 21:11:49
15 SlyFifer,
Good post.
Also how many more "Waterfront Plans" and "plans to kickstart development" are there going to be ?
It would be nice if they had finished just one of the previous ones .
It all started to go wrong when FP's/Terry Smith failed to keep their promises made more than a decade ago .

What odds are the bookies giving that there will be another "Waterfront Developement" plan next year and the next year and the ................ ! ?
15

OscarDeutsch,

Glasgow 16/05/2009 21:32:24
Buttress - if you read this, can you contact me using the contact address at the Scottish Cinemas website? Got some interesting info on the ongoing saga of the Odeon you might like!
16

Buttress,

16/05/2009 23:51:36
Oooh - something scandalous? Do tell us all... we won't breathe a word to another soul!





17

OscarDeutsch,

Glasgow 17/05/2009 02:13:47
Can't really print it out in full here, but let's just say I have a document commissioned by HS which appears to suggest strongly that a similar document produced by the council was nothing short of drivel...
18

Buttress,

17/05/2009 10:03:55
Now there's a surprise. That will be the document the council had produced to say that there was no way forward other than demolition, and that information was provided by the developer and its agents (Montagu Evans I seem to recall. Not a surprise there either.)

Although HS isn't really shy of doing a similar thing, as it did re Caltongate, it's just re Caltongate it had supported the demolition.It managed to have produced a risible report which wouldn't have held up at an inquiry.

It's a nice little money earner, writing reports to support the person paying for it. He who pays the piper etc. Cynical? Me?

19

OscarDeutsch,

Glasgow 17/05/2009 11:19:29
I've a copy of correspondence between the council and Montagu Evans about their report - its limited scope and lack of proper third party consultation appears to be down to the council pretty much limiting it in the commissioning brief to information supplied by CEC and DHP. It was also given a pretty tight turnaround, the council were keen it be produced in two weeks - and for this, the princely sum of 6,750 quid plus VAT was charged... HS's report, on the other hand, was produced by Drivers Jonas, and concludes that the valuations and rental expectations quoted in the Mont Evans report were unrealistic and inappropriately calculated, and that the only thing proven was that DHP were only interested in the maximum return for the property. It concludes firmly that "demolition is not the minimum necessary to retain the building. Indeed, we do not believe the demolition of the auditorium is justified". Interesting stuff...
20

Buttress,

17/05/2009 11:34:26
Have you seen this?

Security concerns?

http://www.28dayslater.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=498122
21

OscarDeutsch,

Glasgow 17/05/2009 11:54:57
Yup, the council and DHP were informed the day after that appeared, so hopefully all secure again.
22

Buttress,

17/05/2009 13:16:41
Yes - it was DJ which produced the report on Caltongate, at a cost of thirteen grand! That concluded that as the listed Canongate Venture wasn't suitable for conversion to the desired conference centre it was OK to demolish it! And that was AFTER HS had said it was relaxed about the demolition, said Caltongate was fine by HS, and the council had given permission. It was only commissioned, IMHO, to give support to the idea that an inquiry wasn't required. Now why was that I wonder? Snouts in troughs, a realisation that HS had made a major error, you decide!

But at least this time HS is on the side of right, and sounds fair, although Historic Scotland has some serious questions to answer about its use of external consultants and the brief it gives...

So really, they are all only in it for the cash, these 'external' 'expert' consultants.

So far, then, thousands upon thousands of public cash has been paid out, first by CEC and then by HS, for reports on the Odeaon.

Have you sent a copy to Coun Cameron Rose, who is so supportive of the demolition and against a public inquiry? :-)
23

Buttress,

17/05/2009 13:38:12
In fact, here he is :-

http://cameronrose.blogspot.com/2009/05/odeon-debate.html


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.