<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Tests 'seem to confirm' remains are of St Paul</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com/template/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=7096&amp;ArticleID=5408962&amp;format=rss#comments</link>
<description>Comments on "Tests 'seem to confirm' remains are of St Paul"</description>
<language>en-gb</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Johnston Press PLC</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:50:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<ttl>5</ttl>
<item>
<title>Posted by Pocket Dictionary</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4173175</link>
<description><![CDATA[#4 spot on. Did Paul not tell some people in the Bible to get up and not worship him for he was only human like them? Yet the RCC encourages prayers to saints. ]]></description>
<guid>/arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4173175</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Horrible Cankers  @Cyber Shebeen</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171996</link>
<description><![CDATA[You can keep your St Pauls...much rather have a good gander at the remains of Pompei and the mummified citizens who attempted to leave but never made it....]]></description>
<guid>/arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171996</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Kenny A</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171654</link>
<description><![CDATA[Perhaps they are his bones but the Catholic church was bad for the number of relics that appeared over the years as were others. All this proves is it is a man from possibly 2000 years ago. A lot of fackary and hocus pocus going on still. The non decomposing saints, solid blood and fragments of the true cross which would make a reasonable sized forrest.

If the remains are true, good, it in many ways is not important as long as their is belief.

Wish I could have worded this better as I am not anti catholic but find this devotion to the material rather than the spiritual difficult. Even the spear has been proved to date from much later than the crusifiction yet many still believe in it. The shroud of Turin is an other examole.

Saying all that the pope I feel had little choice in what he said.

I hope they are the true remains but we will never know.]]></description>
<guid>/arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171654</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Boy Wonder</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171511</link>
<description><![CDATA[Is anyone around that coild positively ID the man???? 

I mean the bones aren't exactly going to have his name inscribed on them, are they??

What a load of old tosh! ]]></description>
<guid>/arts/Tests-39seem-to-confirm39-remains.5408962.jp#comment4171511</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>