Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£20m hole in city budget puts building projects under threat



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 October 2008
SOME of the city's major public building projects, including new schools, are set to face delays after council chiefs revealed a £20 million black hole in their finances.
City leaders had budgeted for around £43m to come from the sale of council-owned land in the current year to help bankroll its building commitments.

But a slowdown in the property market has meant a lot of these sales have been cancelled or delaye
d and the local authority is now facing a £20 million shortfall.

Among the capital projects which could be affected by the drop in revenue are the new schools building projects, a replacement for Meadowbank Stadium and the Glenogle Baths refurbishment.

Although council bosses do anticipate many of the planned land or building sales to go through in a couple of years' time, department heads in the council have been sent back to the drawing board to look again at the timescales of their commitments.

Among the options open to the council to make up the shortfall is taking money from elsewhere in its budget or borrowing.

However, it is thought that stretching some of the projects over a longer timeframe is the preferred option.

Council chiefs have also warned that many of the annual dividends from council-owned companies, such as Lothian Buses, are expected to be largely reduced as a result of the economic slowdown.

Opposition politicians today called on city leaders to get their own budgets in order, as well as lobbying the Scottish Government for more money.

The city's Tory finance spokesman, Councillor Cameron Rose, said: "We need to be looking at ways of trimming the fat right across the council but also looking at attracting outside investment to keep the projects going."

Earlier this month council bosses admitted that "a degree of risk" surrounds half of the £33m it has committed to rebuilding or replacing five crumbling schools in the city because of the credit crunch.

Labour's city finance spokesman, Councillor Ian Murray, said:

"It is vital that we keep public sector investment in capital projects going and indeed these circumstances would, if the Government provides the funding, mean you would also be getting more value for money."

Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, the city's finance leader, said: "This city, like every other community, will feel the effects of the credit crunch and rising prices.

"It will impact on our plans, but what we have to do is ensure that we continue to deliver as much for the people of Edinburgh as we can, and to keep ourselves well placed for when the recovery comes.

"Our intention is to plan for the long-term but we must also focus on the problems of today, especially with the current uncertainty over economic conditions."





The full article contains 467 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 October 2008 10:48 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Council
 
1

Skip McClendon,

30/10/2008 12:18:06
Hmmmm....are there any unneccessary, large building projects currently going on that might be draining the Cooncil's finances...
2

JJH,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 12:25:00
What better reason to STOP THE TRAMS!!!!!
3

Randan,

30/10/2008 12:25:18
Haw haw haw! The evil plans of our muppet council are in deep doodoo!
4

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 30/10/2008 12:37:03
The trams are more important to Edinburgh than life itself !
5

Statsman,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 12:46:57
Why are land sales being budgeted as basic income? Stupid council.
6

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 12:56:29
"sale of council-owned land in the current year to help bankroll its building commitments"? The previous administration, under the Dear Leadership of Donald Anderson (now reinvented as a PR Consultant, ffs!) has already flogged off most of the 'family silver' to pay for their grandiose projects (and try to bribe us with our own money). Just a pity that now the chickens are coming home to roost with a vengeance, these Turkeys have flown the coop.
And isn't it odd how a) none of the above 'cuts' mentions the Sacred TramCar White Elephant Vanity Memorial to Dopey Burns Project and b) how the defecit has shrunk from the £30m reported in this morning's Scotsman to £20m here?
7

alex paterson,

edinburgh 30/10/2008 12:57:05
How much is being put aside for councilors breaks overseas?is the £20million from the honesty box.
8

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 13:08:11
Scrap the trams.

Problem solved.
9

Randan,

30/10/2008 13:15:31
The council is not paying for the trams, it's Scottish government money.
So much as it's a good idea to scrap it, the money won't be going in to the council coffers.
10

Randan,

30/10/2008 13:17:29
Oh! Oh!
I have an idea, why don't we rig the clocking in box for staff to claim that they are working less than they really are. That would even out their cheating and return a huge pile of cash to the skint council.
11

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 13:39:41
And just in case anyone misses it, the Embra Evening Chip-Wrapper has tried to tuck yesterday's big tram story in the Scotsman "Tram chiefs abandon plan to bar all traffic from Princes Street" into a wee paragraph at the bottom of the Neil Renilson Quits" story. The Scotsman reported "This will mean a lengthy delay to the opening date, already delayed from February 2011 to start running in July 2011" - AND " . . almost certain to see the pricetag for the project, currently pegged at £512 million, rise again". Talk about trying to bury bad news for the benefit of your sponsors!
12

Skip McClendon,

30/10/2008 14:02:17
#9

While the Scottish Government has provided the majority of the current funding, the Council is making a significant contribution from its own funds. The Council will also be 100% responsible for any costs over-runs. Which, as #11 notes, are projected the rise substantially due to delays in the project.

Scrap the trams, protect the Council Tax payers from the forking out for the cost over-runs, and return the Government's allocation to them so that it can be spent on better projects with national benefits.
13

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 14:02:55
Randan (9) - The Council is having to find a £45m contribution to Phase 1A of the trams. It has so far banked £3m. The rest of the contribution was to have been made up largely from land sales, developer contributions and borrowings of £12.9m. With land values through the floor and development all but stalled, the Council will require to borrow significantly more, thereby taking the total contribution well over £45m.

It will also need to budget for lifecycle replacement costs for the tram of £44m and, if it is so inclined, how it will compensate Lothian Buses for the tens-of millions of pounds of annual operating losses identified in Appendix III to the tram final business case.


14

Old Town Resident,

edinburgh 30/10/2008 14:08:33
Its not only dropped £10m but also Caltongate

independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com for more news
15

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 14:08:39
#9, You're correct, but the Government commitment is frozen at £500M. (that's half a billion quid, folks!) Embra already has a funding black hole in their contribution and any further increases due to incompetence, mismanagement or fraud will have to be made up - somehow - by das kooncil. i.e., the council taxpayers. If this Monument to the Vanity of Anderson and Burns is cancelled, maybe the Government could redistribute their contribution to more pressing causes than a single TramLINE that goes from not-quite-the Airport to a desolate wasteland at Granton. Just a thought.
16

Randan,

30/10/2008 14:22:55
Thanks for pointing out my error folks. Best that we all know the truth.
17

Alasdair,

30/10/2008 14:23:50
It's not all bad news - the Black Hole has gone gown to £20million from the £30million reported in this morning's Scotsman!
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Credit-crunch--puts-.4643456.jp

Great work guys, no-one laughs at the standard of reporting in these papers at all!
18

Epicuras,

30/10/2008 14:24:03
There's no problem with the budget/financial situation at the council except that caused by diverting funds away from services and into political and personally motivated non essential expenditure.
Just call in Audit Scotland, the Standards Commission and the Fraud Squad - problem solved.
19

Scotish Exile,

30/10/2008 15:12:30
#18, aye like making damn sure they get their (gold plated) pensions.
20

Top Floor,

30/10/2008 15:19:05

If I recall correctly, line 1a is costed at just under £500m and line 1b an additional £80m (?) so the effect of any funding shortfall will be to make 1b more difficult to deliver.

In that event a more imaginitive funding package will be needed to fund 1b and subsequent network extensions.

Any ideas...?


21

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 15:26:58
#20 - NO, that's what we pay Das Kooncil for. The Brain dead in the City Chambers better start digging deep into their imagination for some imaginary money if their TramCar LINE isn't to remain imaginary as well.
22

Farmernot,

30/10/2008 15:36:20
There are more than 20million holes in Edinburghs roads right now !!!!
23

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 15:36:32
Trams anyone??

"Building projects under threat" - not just building projectes but 'services', or what laughingly passes for them in this over-rated town.

We pay the highest Council Tax in Scotland, only to have our money squandered and wasted by a bunch of bungling Local Authority incompetents.

Get rid of the trams and departmental directors/management across the Town Council.
24

thomasthetankmykewylsonjohnwallacebasajdk,

30/10/2008 18:22:31
#6 Dont you have SomethinG silver t0 polish?
25

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 20:19:06
#23 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7244836.stm
Like the other usual anti-tram suspects, you are just wrong - there are 8 councils with higher council tax than Edinburgh. Never let facts get in the way of a good rant.
#13 You are confused - £96m of the £545m is contingency, some of which will be used should the council decide to go ahead with phase 1b. Cancellation of the tram project would make the council worse off as not a penny is going towards the tram project this year yet it would have to repay developer contributions already received, as well as find a way to fund the black hole caused by not receiving other contributions such as £4m from Haymarket.
26

Just a tax payer,

EDINBURGH 30/10/2008 22:35:58
SCRAP THE TRAMS AND YOU SAVE A FORTUNE THAT COULD BE USED FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS
27

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 23:51:53
David Harrington (25) - I understand that the government is to release blocks of funding and, at each of these stages, the Council is expected to pay its pro rata share.

As far as contingency is concerned, it is proving very difficult to obtain information in relation to costs and no figure has been released as to the level of claims so far, either pending or settled. Given that the utilities work commenced prior to an approved detailed signed being in place, the potential for cost overruns is certainly there - just as it was with Holyrood.

I think we can also assume that the delay in completing these works will have an escalating effect on the infrastructure costs. Without being able to see the figures to date, who can say how much of the contingency is left?
28

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 31/10/2008 12:02:16
SarahB @27 - you're (as always) clearly speaking from a position of some knowledge. Can you explain what would happen if the Council is unable to meet its pro-rata commitment at any particular funding stage?
And is Harrington an alias for a certain Cross chap?
29

Paddi,

31/10/2008 19:06:57
Scrap gold plated final salary pension schemes that those in the private sector can only dream about.
30

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 31/10/2008 20:28:52
I was told of the pro rata payments by an SNP councillor but have never seen any paper setting out when these payments are to be made. All I saw was a Council report from last December setting out how the contribution was comprised (including, at that time, £12.9m of borrowings, the interest payments for which were to be met from TEL revenues).

In theory, the government could withhold payments pending the council coming up with its instalment, but that is very unlikely to happen. I think it more likely that the government would stump up the promised £500m and then wash its hands of the project and the Council would then look to borrow whatever further funds it requires.

It is a very interesting time, is it not, Thomas? I hear the project is in major financial difficulty and you can imagine all sorts of scenarios arising. How about, infrastructure is put in place at Leith and Airport - Haymarket but is delayed on Princes Street because of utilities diversions. However, by the time those diversions are done, the money has run out. What would happen then? And with the depot at Gogar, how would trams run/turnround on the Leith Walk stretch? Where would trams turn around at Haymarket? The Council would have to find the money to complete construction from somewhere but the level of borrowing might be so high that TEL simply cannot service the debt.

This has been one of the main problems all the way along: the project was not thought out at the start, the risks were not properly identified and protection to ensure the scheme was delivered was not put in place. It has been, is and will continue to be an utter shambles.

I don't think that irate character you mention would comment on a public forum - he operates much more insidiously than that.
31

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 01/11/2008 23:25:14
no,money.but.MR.GRUBB.gets.a.trip.to.INDIA.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would you hand your garden over to someone who wants an allotment but can’t get one?
Yes, as long as they gave me some of the veg
No, I’d rather do the gardening myself
No, I don’t want anyone digging up my paving slabs

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.