Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th December 2009

Tram chiefs' claims: 'Their costs are a matter of public concern'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 June 2009
WHEN lexicographers come to decide on the word that sums up 2009, there can be only one contender: expenses.
First we had MPs, fixing up duck houses and moats with thousands of taxpayers' pounds, shopping for £250 alarm clocks and even spending £1,200 on giant photos of themselves, all using the public purse.

The ramifications of the Great Westminster Tr
ough Scandal have yet to be fully realised. Come election time, probably next May, scores of MPs are likely to have stood down, dozens may have been deselected, and perhaps – just perhaps – more than a few will have faced police investigation.

Then came the BBC. Last week we discovered that Auntie Beeb's executives had also been living it large, this time at licence-payers' expense. £100 for a bottle of champagne as a present to Sir Bruce Forsyth? Stick it on expenses. Need to nip back from a luxury holiday to Britain to deal with that foul-mouthed Jonathan Ross? No problem, charge it to the viewers.

It's all been a bit depressing and has just confirmed the views of the many cynics who have always assumed that no-one can be trusted not to help themselves when a big buffet of free stuff is available to them.

The fact that the MP and BBC expenses details were revealed by the media has of course raised chortles among those who suggest that journalists are the worst when it comes to maximising expenses.

But, whatever the truth of this accusation, the fact is that most journalists are paid for by private employers, who put in place safeguards to protect their companies' finances from fraud.

Unlike them, but like MPs and BBC bosses, the executives who are taking forward the Edinburgh tram project are ultimately paid for from public money. And that is why their extra costs is a matter of public concern.

Today, the Evening News reveals that in less than two years they claimed £100,000. Unlike MPs, these were not personal expenses. Most of it went on items like flights and hotels, and a good number of trips will have been necessary to meet contractors and suppliers, and to see how tram systems have worked in other countries.

So some such costs can easily be justified and will be worth it if they ensure that we end up with a good tram system. But when several thousand pounds went on unspecified sundries, and when former chief executive Willie Gallagher was able to spend £4,500 on "dinners and entertaining", we'll reserve judgement on that score until the trams are delivered at an acceptable time – and an acceptable cost.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 June 2009 9:10 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh transport plans
 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 29/06/2009 12:01:29
Can the News not look a little deeper at this please and list visits by councilors and council staff?
2

Logie Almond,

29/06/2009 15:31:37
The Evening News is not in any position to lecture others about expenses until they publish the salaries and expenses of their editor and senior management, and of the directors of Johnston Press, who are on seven-figure packages.
3

Dragonlord,

29/06/2009 20:07:13
2# The EEN is a commercial business and does not need to publish these figures, except to share holders. The tram LINE and council officials are paid out of the PUBLIC purse and should bear up to scrutiny.
4

Logie Almond,

29/06/2009 21:48:25
#3, of course you are right in a legal sense but my point is that it is self righteous of the Evening News to criticise others when they will not reveal their own expense claims.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should TIE be spending time Twittering and using social networking sites?
Yes, many people communicate this way now
No, it’s just another form of spin
No, it should focus on getting the work done on time


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.