Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

So just who's laughing now? asks green prince



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
05 April 2007
PRINCE Charles has claimed his long-running campaign to protect rare livestock has been vindicated despite facing a "chorus of ridicule".
The prince, an environmental campaigner who owns an organic farm, said it was no surprise that there had been a shift back towards protecting heritage livestock and crops.

There are about 50 rare breeds of livestock in the UK today, and a surge in consumer demand for them, coupled with a change in farm subsidies favouring the more environmentally-aware farmer, has meant a growing number of threatened breeds are being taken off the "at risk" list.

The list includes several native Scottish breeds such as the Belted Galloway cow and the Shetland and Hebridean sheep, which have all been removed from the Rare Breeds Survival Trust's endangered register.

"Hundreds of varieties have been lost, wonderful things that our forefathers took enormous trouble to develop, which in many cases are resistant to all sorts of prevalent diseases," the prince said in an interview on Gardener's Question Time to be broadcast by BBC Radio 4 on Sunday.

"Which is why I've been going on for all these years - to a chorus of ridicule - about the importance of protecting and preserving rare native breeds of cattle, sheep, pig and chicken.

"And sure enough, now, surprise, surprise, they're beginning to come back," he said in the interview, which will mark the show's 60th anniversary.

The prince blamed "crazy" European Union laws for a sharp fall in the variety of plant seeds on sale and warned that this risked leading to a rise in plant diseases.

Charles has often been mocked for his views. When he revealed he liked talking to plants, the Sun published a photograph captioned: "A loon with his thoughts."

Lawrence Alderson, chairman of the Rare Breeds Survival Trust, said the recovery of rare breeds was down to hard-headed business sense and old-fashioned sentiment.

The full article contains 324 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ari_1965,

It's a good thing 05/04/2007 02:33:32

It's certainly a good thing to read that hardy, native breeds of livestock are on the comeback. Prince Charles is right when he says that native breeds of livestock are often hardier and naturally resistant to diseases. The same is true for the native plants I planted four years ago in my garden and around my house. They've survived the vicissitudes of the changeable Minnesota climate (in fact, they've thrived on it), and they are resistant to pests without my needing to do a lot of spraying of toxic chemicals.

I do wish The Scotsman would let go of the whole "loonie who talks to plants" thing. They've repeated that for decades now. Since they repeat it every time Prince Charles mentions anything to do with caring for the environment, it gives me the impression that The Scotsman is saying that caring about the environment is unimportant and silly. I hope that's not true.

And, anyway, who cares if he does talk to his plants? We all have our personal quirks and weirdnesses. In a world in which a suicide bomber gets praise from his family and country for killing himself and as many innocent passersby as he can, I think a man who talks to his plants is the least of our worries.

2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Erewhon 05/04/2007 05:56:51

The problem is that many are laughing at the prince, rather than with him. Why would a sane man hoping to be king agree to be interviewed in his garden wearing a dressing gown and welly boots? Doesn't he see that that detracts from the serious nature of his message?

3

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 05/04/2007 13:14:11

#2

When and where did you see the Prince of Wales interviewed in his dressing gown and wellies?

Source please!

All dedicated gardeners are a bit "special" and the POW is no different.

At least he is not wining and dining himself into a premature death like George IV as POW or being an utter and useless person and King as Edward VIII was.

4

wattie>x 1,

05/04/2007 13:54:09

What member of this dysfunctional family never have the last laugh; no matter the strength of their often outrageous comments and habitual depraved behaviour?
They are only too well aware of the security they enjoy in their privileged life style manner.
Is it not a fact, that this former Germanic family are the last remaining *functional* royalty left in Europe who still enjoy divine adulation at the total expense of *their subjects*?
Was it not also a fact that Chairlie used to have a valet who held a chantie for him too *p*into?

5

TimW1234,

0ttawa, Canada 06/04/2007 03:49:23

#6 hORRIBLE CANKERS

Thank YOU!

Actually, I am familiar with persons as depicted in the clip you so kindly provided and have forwarded it to them for their edification.

It is so gratifying that peope such as yourself are so kind and caring to take the the time to EDIFY me.

As ever,

moi

6

Pan,

Canada 06/04/2007 18:17:45

So, the Prince wore wellies and a dressing gown? So what? His consistent message, for years, has been one of conservation - now a secular religion amongst the chattering classes and their acolytes.
By the way, some references to the Royal Family make one wonder about your pride in your own History. The constant self-deprecation of British History by Brits makes one think that you are deliberately self-destructing as a Nation and as a Culture. Do you not know that you civilized half the world, and that the other half is trying to catch up? The Royals cost you money? Then undo the Settlement, and give back the Royal Lands (if you still believe in private ownership). You may be srprised at the difference. The Windsors would be better off.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.