Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 21st November 2009

SNP accused of '£30m bribe' to bridge construction firms

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 September 2009
LABOUR has attacked the Scottish Government over plans repay tendering costs to firms if the new Forth road bridge does not go ahead.
The Scottish Parliament's finance committee was asked to agree that the firms eventually shortlisted for the main £1.1 billion contract could claim up to £10m each if the project fell through.

But Labour finance spokesman David Whitton claimed the government was effectively "bribing" companies to tender for the new crossing.

He said: "Why on earth should the parliament be forking out what could be £30 million if you've got three bidders for a project like this, especially when we're being told we've got less money to spend?"

And it emerged during the committee's discussion that unsuccessful bidders could be refunded up to £5m each – even if the bridge does go ahead.

Now the committee is to ask Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson for further clarification.

Mr Whitton said: "Scottish tax payers are effectively being asked to fork out tens of millions of pounds because big business doesn't trust the SNP to deliver this project. The Transport Minister must come before the committee and explain himself.

"Officials told us the construction firms would be reluctant to bid if they felt parliament may reject the Forth Road Bridge Bill or if there was a chance the government would not go ahead with the project.

"What was more astonishing was the revelation that even if the bridge does go ahead the two losing tenders would be able to claim up to £5m for their failed bid."

Labour's Jackie Baillie said no such underwriting of tendering costs had happened before.

But the Scottish Government said it was following Treasury guidelines for major projects.

A spokesman said: "We will deliver a new Forth crossing on time and on budget by 2016 at a cost of between £1.7-£2.3 billion.

"This is a world class, prestigious project and these standard industry provisions will ensure we maximise competition and achieve the best overall price."

Meanwhile, business leaders in Fife have accused Edinburgh council chiefs of being "short-sighted" and "insular" after urging MSPs to postpone the building of the new Forth crossing.

The city council wants construction of the £2 billion new bridge to be delayed until 2011-12, when an update on the corrosion of the existing road bridge's main cable's should be available.

Alan Russell, chief executive of Fife Chamber of Commerce, described the council's request as "ridiculous".

He said: "This is a very short-sighted and insular viewpoint that does not take into account the fact that the new Forth bridge is a vital project for Scotland's infrastructure and a lifeline for businesses and residents north of the Forth.

"Any businesses will be aware that the government cannot afford to delay."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 September 2009 12:11 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Bridges
 
1

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 16/09/2009 15:25:19
SNP are a waste of time.
2

Xena - Warrior Princess,

16/09/2009 15:32:56
I know the date is not April 1 but they are surely having a laugh!
3

brownlie,

16/09/2009 15:47:03
Bribery using public funds being a criminal offence, this is a very serious allegation by the Scotsman.
4

Mikey,

Carstairs Junction 16/09/2009 16:44:22
Labour are a waste of time. These Quislings would throw money at the companies for 40 years if they had their way. Thieves and lowlifes, that's Labour. Only a moron would vote for them!
5

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 16/09/2009 16:58:26
4 .. Agreed ....

But get the SNP to give you a vote on an 'independent' Scotland joining the EU -- you don't want to swap cow-towing to westminster to complete slavery to brussels !
6

Finnzz,

16/09/2009 17:20:00
Justin Timbercock must have broken the boards this morning with his usual garbage.

Back to the story.

Labour are only annoyed because the Government will not pander to their plans for a PPP funded project. PPP will of course mean tripling the cost and leaving the next two generations to pay for it.
7

Marian,

16/09/2009 17:36:06
"Labour's Jackie Baillie said no such underwriting of tendering costs had happened before."

"But the Scottish Government said it was following Treasury guidelines for major projects."

The latter says it all really - once again New Labour's branch office in Scotland are way out of step and out of tune with reality.

I should think that this is money well spent given the hurdles that this project has to overcome i.e. UK Treasury may pull the plug due to Brown's UK economic crisis or unionist opposition at Holyrood may succumb to its usual mendacious tendencies and vote to block the project.
8

morris,

edinburgh 16/09/2009 17:54:44
5

An independent Scotland( as would the newly independent England/Wales/Northern Ireland) retain membership unless she/either/both could substantiate a majority wish of her population to leave .Many senior EU figures have given reassurances that the claims of David Martin (Labour) were total garbage, and as far as the European Community is concerned an EU without oil rich Scotland is unthinkable. Of course probability is only that ,and nobody can say with absolute certainty whether we will agree or consult or what,only what will probably happen.Crystal balls are unfortunately lmited ,if they work at all.

What will probably happen is we will retain membership provided the terms offered are acceptable to Scotland ,and if the people do not agree a referendum will surely be demanded and will be held.The opposition parties(whoever they may be) will make sure of that.

You will neither be refused nor railroaded into membership,but you will be assumed to wish to retain membership by the EU, until such time as clearly this is a matter which is in doubt.The people will have what the majority wish .That is inevitable in a democracy.That's how we got MaCavity and his cohorts after all.

One thing you can rest assured of is we will get what we deserve. If we have nothing................its because we deserved or demanded nothing.

Despite reassurances that Scotland will be welcomed almost seamlessly to retain membership,(which is what we are as currently part of the UK,as will the UK minus Scotland part),we assume that terms agreeable can be reached,and I doubt that Scotland's present fishing quota will suffice.I would expect Scotland to take a very hard line to protect our fishermen.There will be areas of conflict for sure, but generally I can see no reason why we would not secure at least a deal equivalent to if not better than the current one.The EU will certainly not offer that which we cannot possibly accept, because they are not stupid and realise we wont a
9

Pantaloon,

16/09/2009 18:07:19
#4

You seem very patronising of anyone who would vote for any party other than SNP.

Almost every comment you make refers to non SNP supporters as morons, stupid etc.

It doesn't say very much about the intellect of an SNP supporter, indeed it only serves to heighten the absolute disgust they have for anyone who does not want to follow Mr Salmonds romantic dream.
10

Brianwci,

17/09/2009 01:05:41
"Now the committee is to ask Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson for further clarification."

Why bother, just ask London Labour's David Whitton, he thinks he knows enough to accuse the Government of bribery.

Maybe he's getting his Government's confused?
11

redcliffe62,

17/09/2009 01:57:19
snp accused (by labour press release)story number 436, labour accused stories still at NIL, or did i miss one?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.