Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Beware dark days after the euphoria of bank bail-out



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 October 2008
STOCK market relief at the government's bail-out of three of Britain's big banks could prove short-lived, City experts believe.
They said yesterday it would be wrong to assume the stock market had bottomed following the strong shares surge on Monday after the effective nationalisation of Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and Lloyds TSB and further gains yesterday

After last we
ek's 20 per cent plunge in leading blue-chip stocks, the biggest fall since the October 1987 crash, the FTSE 100 index surged 8 per cent on Monday following the government's dramatic action.

Yesterday the Footsie closed up a further 137 points after initially putting on more than 200 points in the morning.

But City sources said there remained the strong likelihood of recession in the final two quarters of this year to depress stock market sentiment.

In addition, fund managers and analysts said the market remained disturbed at the Treasury's decision to ban RBS, HBOS and Lloyds TSB from paying dividends to its shareholders for up to an estimated five years.

Nick Parsons, market strategist at nabCapital, said: "I don't think this (nationalisation of the banks] is an unequivocal buying signal for stocks.

"Japan recapitalised its banks in the wake of the property bubble bursting there in 1990.

"But the Nikkei index, even with its record one-day rise yesterday, up 14 per cent at 9,447, still compares with its peak in December 1989 of 38,957. In other words it has still lost three-quarters of its value despite the banking recapitalisation."

Mr Parsons said investor fears remained that the coming British recession would "not be U-shaped but L-shaped, like the Japanese experience".

City sentiment will also remain shaky because banking stocks, a key swing sector in the FTSE 100, had "virtually become "a dividend-free zone for the foreseeable future", according to one observer.

He said: "Institutional investors are going to quickly work out that the only bet they will have in the banking sector will be on capital gains. Dividend yield has gone out of the window for RBS, Lloyds TSB and HBOS for the foreseeable future until the government's preference shares have been paid back."

Barclays, even though it has not taken up the government's bail-out offer, also indicated earlier this week that it was not paying a final dividend for 2008 to conserve capital, and that payments were unlikely to resume until at least the second half of 2009.

Keith Bowman at Hargreaves Lansdown said: "Drawing a line under the financial crisis is not necessarily the same thing as having more sustainable long-term benefit for the stock market.

"The fact that there is regulatory uncertainty with such a big government presence in the banking sector will also weigh on those stocks and perhaps the wider market for some time yet."

Many in the City believe that while a two-quarterly recession is now factored in to many stock market valuations, sentiment could worsen if the recession lasts longer.

During the 1990-92 recession there were five consecutive quarters of negative growth.

Many experts believe there will be a flight to good cash-flow stocks, where earnings buttress dividend payments in a lengthy downturn.

Analysts say big defensive stocks in this situation could include the utility groups, oil and pharmaceuticals giants and non-airline transport companies.

One market strategist said: "What's out at the moment is retailers, pub groups, restaurants and the like, anything dependent on discretionary consumer spending. They are in the eye of the storm."

Rahul Sharma, a director at Edinburgh-based fund manager Martin Currie, said: "The good news for consumers is if the government's action with the banks eases up banks lending to each other they will eventually start lending to consumers."

But Mr Sharma said this was "much farther down the line" and would have little short-term effect on the performance of the wider stock market.

Another analyst said: "Rallies don't go in a straight line. It's impossible to tell if last Friday was the bottom of this market."



The full article contains 686 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 16/10/2008 07:30:22
The euphoria was a dead cat bounce. Irrational exuberance. Don't you just love the gobbledegook these 'analysts' and 'financiers' spout? Oh look, Hargreaves Lansdown quoted yet again!
2

Web Smith,

California 19/10/2008 23:25:51
Mortgages are not the problem. They are just a drop in the bucket that is being used as a scapegoat. The problem is that banks and investors have created $520 trillion worth of derivatives. The entire worlds’ combined GDP, real estate, and stock is worth about $225 trillion. Banks and investors have secretly signed contracts agreeing to sell the world for over twice what it’s worth. Since most of these transactions are secret, no one knows who has the contracts and who doesn’t, so, none of the banks want to loan each other money because they might go out of business and they are hoarding their money because they might need it.

$700 billion given to the banks is not going to fix this. $10 trillion given to the banks is not going to fix this. All of this money just devalues the currency and makes things worse. A meeting is not going to fix this. A new President is not going to fix this.

You also have to elect Congress members and Senators who are going to listen to you the next time.

http://ewebsmith.com/Finance/therealproblem.html

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are RBS and HBOS right to cancel their staff Christmas parties?
Yes, they can’t afford to waste money on jollies
No, the staff deserve some sort of reward
If it costs to cancel anyway they should just have them

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.