Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Battle royal over salmon fishing as villagers fight for 'ancient rights'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
13 November 2007
MORE than 600 years ago the tiny fishing hamlet of Inverbervie was elevated to the privileged status of a Royal Burgh by a grateful King David II after local fishermen came to his rescue when his ship was wrecked on the rugged Mearns coastline.
The Royal decree he granted in 1342 gave villagers the right to "tak reid fish" - salmon - from the mouth of the River Bervie which flows into the North Sea at the Kincardineshire town.

But now furious residents claim their ancient fishing rights
are under threat from plans by the Dee District Salmon Fisheries Board to bring in the angling association from nearby Stonehaven to run the fishery on a stretch of the river where it is claimed locals have been poaching salmon by using illegal lead weighted lines to "rip" the fish from the water.

Officials on the fisheries board claim they secured the fishing rights for the mouth of the river four years ago when they bought out the local salmon coastal netting station.

But they are awaiting solicitors' advice on whether their rights supersede those of the Royal Charter, before bringing in the Stonehaven and District Angling Association to take over control.

Alastair Reid, an 81-year-old pensioner from Inverbervie, who has fished the river all his life, is leading the campaign to have the provisions of the Royal Charter upheld. "The people will not stand by and let them destroy something they were given freely so many years ago by Royal Charter. Those rights have never been rescinded," he said.

"We don't want outsiders coming down here and trying to control what happens on our river.

"The people of 'Bervie' know how it should be properly run by ourselves."

However, Dave MacDonald, the secretary of the Stonehaven and District Angling Association, said: "The problem is that a very, very small minority in Inverbervie seem to think the Royal Charter gives them carte blanche to take fish by any means possible - by the back, by the tail, by the stomach - you name it. They are ripping the salmon from the river.

"There is a hard-core minority at Inverbervie who don't fish legally for salmon but simply poach them."

Mr MacDonald added: "We don't want to take away ancient rights. What we want to do is regulate what is happening and stop illegal poaching."

SALMON ACT MAY NOT AFFECT CHARTER

PROFESSOR Roddy Paisley, an expert in commercial property law at Aberdeen University, said the people of Inverbervie may well have the right to carry on fishing free under their Royal Charter granted by King David II, below.

He said:

"The Salmon Act is directly relevant to whether or not people are fishing in a proper way but it will not say who is entitled to fish.

"Royal Charters may still be valid. If it is the case that the Royal Charter was originally granted and the people of Inverbervie have continued to exercise these rights, then this is a perfectly legitimate right and it will stand. There is a potential here that both of these rights could be valid. There could be a grant of salmon fishing, but it cannot take away a right already granted."



The full article contains 544 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 November 2007 9:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Pete39,

Tassy 13/11/2007 01:29:55

Hardly destroyed, just brought up to date. I am sure that there were many Royal Charters that allowed landowners the sole pleasure of hunting and fishing and hanging anyone that got in their way. I would believe that they would have been adjusted to meet modern conditions. Maybe not.

2

Bad Yin,

Sentenced to 30 years of boredom 13/11/2007 03:55:14

For $21.00 a year for a license I fish an area as big as Europe. The fish are a natural resource of all the people. Brought up to date? I hardly think so.

3

Guga II,

Rockall 13/11/2007 04:04:39

It's time that all Scottish rivers and waters were brought back under the control of the Scottish people, and that we were all given the right to fish in any river or water.

What right does any group or landowner have to control the fish? The people have the right, the toffs and the so-called landed gentry do not. We neither need, nor want, medieaval, anglicised control over our fisheries.

4

Graeme,

Guangzhou 13/11/2007 04:34:43

Gaga,

You really are a prime eejit. No wonder you are so short with that chip on your shoulder!

5

,

13/11/2007 04:36:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1138057, Article id was mapped to record!
6

Mercutio,

Falkirk 13/11/2007 04:50:16

This is a clear case of local peoples rights being usurped by this Quango.

7

49th State,

Robbing Peter to pay Paul 13/11/2007 05:57:40

Who is going to be the steward of the lands? The gentry were supposed to take care of it for the nobility of long ago. My clan is of the Morrey tribe and fished back when there were only the Irish kings who were living off the toil of the masses. I think the fisheries need to be open to all Scots and cared for by all Scots.

8

Pete39,

Tassy 13/11/2007 06:09:29

I agree with Guga, it is about time Scottish rivers were brought under the control of a recreational board with constant restocking of the lochs and rivers and a single licence to fish the lot. What am I saying, this is what happens in Tasmania. Great fishing Jimmy. Is there any good fishing in Rockall. I accept that it is only a rumour that he goes there for his summer holidays.

9

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 13/11/2007 07:32:35

Rockall is stepped in history. In legend, it is the last remnant of Brazil.

Irish reckon it was created from a pebble thrown from the north coast of the emerald isle. What it actually is is an extinct volcano.

http://www.therockalltimes.co.uk/rockall/picture-gallery....

10

Boy Wonder,

13/11/2007 07:39:37

I'm no angler and I'm not much of a fish eater ... so I've no personal stake in this ... but I do agree with Guga #4.

11

Nick_Byrne,

Glasgow 13/11/2007 08:57:37

Bodies of water need to be managed - it's all very well saying everyone has the right to fish this that and the other but what you'll end up wit his a lot of empty rivers.

12

Guga II,

Rockall 13/11/2007 09:26:31

#12 Nick. You agree then. Managed by the people, for the people, not privately owned and controlled.

13

mr. underperson,

13/11/2007 09:34:22

The real problem seems to be ripping fish illegally, not Bervie's ancient rights. If locals *anywhere* care enough about their fishing rights, they should look after their own, find the culprits, and end this destructive practice. And anyway, sinking lead into the water isn't very clever.

On the point of "ownership" and managment, I'm with Guga.

-mu

14

Subbob,

Not Fishing 13/11/2007 09:38:23

If you give free use, most people would be responsible fishers. You always get the element of those who go over the top for greed\money, so regulation is to stop these people forom spoiling it for all.

15

Tweedmouth,

13/11/2007 09:46:11

A resident of Alaska, or any other American state, can buy a $20 permit that allows him or her to fish for wild salmon any day of the week. They also stand to catch King salmon weighing up to 100 lbs - though the average is 2--30lbs.

A native resident in the Borders cannot fish the Tweed for salmon unless he pays £400 - a day on average - or even £4,000 a week at Kelso.

He cannot fish the tidal waters of the Tweed where the salmon lie in saltwater as far upstream as Norham. He cannot fish from the public common land at Coldstream - even though the bank is owned by 'the people'.

And its nice to know that 'Tweed Forum' - a front for the aristocracy and salmon interests has received an average £35 MILLION a year to 'develop the river' over the last 8 years.

So that's alright then?

16

BAM2,

13/11/2007 11:13:10

#16 - Aye toff support plans so as rich toffs can ramp up the cost of a days fishing and get the "plebs" of the water.

The fact is a lot of the tweed is up for sale. Would this mean the owner pays back 35 million?

The duke of roxburghes support plan.... I notice he doesnt pay much into the kitty. But is more than happy to earn earn earn from it. The folk of bervie are right. I dont agree with the method as it is dangerous and harmful. But I do agree that the rivers should be returned to the scottish people and not the few who raped our country 300 years ago.

I was sure the law covered all scots rivers. That each scot was allowed to take 1 fish for the table.

17

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Ontario 13/11/2007 11:35:59

#4 Guga II and #11 Boy Wonder

The original charter was signed by King David II whom I believe was Scots.

So why is all this talk about the "anglicised control" over fishing"?

When did anglicisation enter into the equation?

18

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 13/11/2007 12:37:54

Several reasons Tim. We do not have a Scots monarchy anymore and things really changed when they coronated a German in 1952.

I agree with Guga.

19

Mikey,

13/11/2007 14:35:34

I also agree with Guga. 'Owning' a river is like 'owning' the rain!

Power to the people!

20

The grouch,

Ontario 13/11/2007 14:42:07

YO, TIM..You still up in Graft Land?...Thought you were of getting your Transmission Changed...Had 2nd Thoughts ..Huh..
The Land Without Sun..Seems more like a Banana Republic..Than part of Europe..Can any Citizen actually own anything over there? Or is it all some kind of Tennant Lease? (Tennant/Peon)
GUGA, m'man...Time for you to get of your Lardy Butt and lead the Masses..A new Political Party in Scotty Land..The 21st Century Party (T21CP)..Kick Ass, Give back to the People.."Hope Never Dies"
Scary Thought for the Fish...Dry Fly, or Wet.... Anyone!!!..NO..Geez..
Australia is of to a new Airline..LARDAIRE..Going to the Extreme for the CHUNKIES
Floss Up..Think Thin..Shalom.

21

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 13/11/2007 16:01:36

More than legend, it's geo-logic fact the the Burgh of Rockall and all it's fishing is part and party to Blue Brazil. The Pictish Navy outposted in Bahia is creating a sensational trimaran strike force. We fully intend to land a women on the famous rock during year of 2008.

Sex, salsa ya gannet! We reclaim our ancestral, inalieanable rights!

22

Hunky Dorey,

Glasgow 13/11/2007 20:42:05

Its good enough for the Scots! We are only English slaves anyway.

23

Digory,

Narnia Scotland 13/11/2007 22:36:04

A pity that people with these sort of views take them out on babies and children.

English incomers note you may be attacked through your children.

24

Digory,

Narnia Scotland 13/11/2007 22:36:59

There are no depths too low.

25

Digory,

Narnia Scotland 13/11/2007 22:38:19

It is precisely when they know that people may be vulnerable.

26

Digory,

Narnia 13/11/2007 22:48:25

Living in a small country can be like living in a one horse town.

27

Digory,

Narnia 13/11/2007 22:53:34

I have not heard any mention of Poaching in connection with the more recent discussions about the deployment of the Police.

28

Pilrig.,

Livingston 13/11/2007 22:54:52

27 - like Luxembourg which has the highest standard of living in Europe ?

29

Jwil,

Lanarkshire 14/11/2007 00:35:12

Fishing rights should be handed over to local angling clubs and not interfered with by landowners. What we don't want is to have to pay for rod licences on top of permits as they have in England!.

30

Pilrig.,

Livingston 14/11/2007 16:55:57

If this goes ahead the folk of Inverbervie will have to go cap in hand to Stonehaven to be allowed to fish their own river.
Never mind, it'll keep some bureaucrat occupied.

31

Pilrig.,

Livingston 14/11/2007 16:57:51

16 - it was the Labour government of 1977 which brought that state of affairs about.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.