Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 13th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scotland's Eden is buried after lottery bid rejection



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 December 2007
PARADISE is lost. An ambitious plan to create a new national showpiece for Scotland is in crisis after an application for £25m of lottery funding was turned down.
The Calyx Project was to have been sited on a 61-acre site on the edge of Perth and was aimed at producing a Scottish rival to Kew Gardens or the Eden Project in Cornwall.

An application was made to the Living Landmarks programme, run by the Big
Lottery Fund (BLF), to distribute millions of pounds to suitable projects across the UK.

But although Calyx made a shortlist earlier this year, it was not included in the final three. A total of £70m was granted to three other projects, including £25m to The Helix, a huge environmental regeneration scheme in Falkirk.

The Calyx - total cost £36m - will not now go ahead, as the rest of the funding was conditional on the lottery grant. A search is being made for other sites in case the project can be rescued, but on a much smaller scale.

Its backers, including prominent Scottish businessmen, gardening celebrities and politicians from the area, have accused the BLF of misleading the bid team into thinking that a project that did not include a major element of land regeneration would stand a chance.

Jim McColl, Scotland's best-known TV gardener and star of BBC's Beechgrove Garden, said: "There is intense disappointment that the Calyx project did not appear to fulfil the Big Lottery Fund mould.

"The schemes that did get the money are driven by local councils, which is great for them, but obviously the BLF has gone for the safer option. I would argue that regeneration is what councils should be doing anyway, not relying on lottery funds."

The Calyx - the name of the petals surrounding a developing bud - would have been created largely on farmland to the southwest of Perth, joined to the site of the national heather collection at Cherrybank

Built as a series of themed areas, it was forecast to attract at least 250,000 visitors every year.

Roseanna Cunningham, the SNP MSP for Perth, said it was an "enormous disappointment" that the Calyx did not get through the lottery process, and added:

"If regeneration was the focus of Living Landmarks then that should have been made much clearer from the very start."

A spokeswoman for the Big Lottery Fund said:

"This has been a very competitive programme with a broad range of high-quality large-scale projects applying for funding. To make it to the latter stage has in itself been a tremendous achievement."



The full article contains 437 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 December 2007 10:18 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

angie black,

missouri 09/12/2007 03:07:55

hi how are you all i am well
Itis nice to hear from you all take care! Angie

2

angie black,

missouri 09/12/2007 03:08:45

Hi how are you all I am well i live in Oak Grove in the usa take care to all of you
love Angie

3

Mikey,

09/12/2007 09:10:46

This is a suprise? Everybody knows that the lottery's sole reason for existence these days is to fund the 2012 olympics in London.

4

Cadgers,

Perth 09/12/2007 10:46:38

Time for a Scottish lottery?

5

Deucharman,

09/12/2007 17:06:52

"aimed at producing a Scottish rival to Kew Gardens or the Eden Project in Cornwall"

It would have been nice if the article acknowleged that Scotland already has what many would say is the best garden in the world, the Royal Botanical Garden in Ediburgh, certainly more than a rival for Kew!

As far as 3 and 4 are concerned, the total lottery funding available for Living Landmarks is £140M, of this £25M (18%) has been awarded to Falkirk, that sounds like a pretty good win for Scotland to me!! (I sometimes suspect that there are those who believe the sole purpose of the Engish is to send us ALL their money?)

6

Robert,

Kirriemuir 10/12/2007 00:41:00

Scotland has beautiful countryside over which it is free to roam so who is interested in another type of public garden? Let us wake-up and let's squander those funds on the preservation of our ancient castles, buildings, and our battle grounds which today (with the exception of a few) are dismal places to which no one desires to return. Why not develop our natural resources to which tourist come in throngs to see rather than try to compete with Disneyland? Anyone who has visited the Isle of Skye in recent years will have discovered that the island's culture and traditions are exploited, not by us parochcial Scots nor the islanders, but by the 'auld enemy' our English neighbours who abandoned the claymore decades ago! They are the ones who are championing the country's ancient and modern traditions while we natives pick our noses and scratch our bums!

Advance Scotland backwards!!

7

hud of sleat,

Yorkshire 17/01/2008 09:55:57
Would it not be possilbe for Scotland to run it's own lottery system or somthing like, to aid the costing of a Scottish Eden. I'm sure most Scots will back a system like that. Why not put it to the poll and find out.
8

DaveSubsea,

Silver City 27/01/2008 13:44:58
And so the Olympic Games London gravy train, begins to make it's presence felt in Scotland.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.