Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council aims to end Dungavel controversy by housing failed asylum families



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 October 2008
A PILOT scheme aimed at ending the detention of children at a controversial immigration centre could be up and running by the start of the new year, it was revealed today.
Under the £150,000 project, failed asylum seekers awaiting deportation would be housed in former council houses in Glasgow before being sent back to their country of origin.

It is designed to end the incarceration of youngsters at the Dungavel facility in Lanarkshire.

Announcing the scheme, new Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy told BBC Radio Scotland: "This is a trial based on the concerns raised in particular by churches in Scotland.

"As Secretary of State for Scotland – I've only been in the job a couple of weeks – one of the first things I did was to see whether we can bring this process forward.

"I would hope to be able for it to be actually launched at the start of the new year."

Dungavel has been a constant target of criticism from politicians, pro-asylum activists and church leaders since it opened in 2001.

The pilot project would see families having access to basic amenities, including a washing machine, fridge and furniture, until they are repatriated.

Mr Murphy, who described the issues surrounding Dungavel as "very emotional", explained the thinking behind the scheme.

Speaking on Good Morning Scotland, he said: "I want to see if we can do something that is sensible, but also sensitive, that looks after the children.

"The truth is that no politician of any party would ever like to see families being put behind the barbed wire in Dungavel."

He went on: "The worry in the past has been that if they weren't behind barbed wire and walls at Dungavel then they abscond.

"Now, on a pilot basis, we're trying to do it differently."

The move follows negotiations with the UK Border Agency and Glasgow City Council.

Mr Murphy said the families involved would be vetted carefully to assess the threat of them absconding.

"The intention is to prepare families for returning to the country which they came from on a voluntary basis," he said.

"I think most fair-minded people in Scotland would say that where there's a genuine threat of them absconding, then living in a flat in Glasgow isn't the right solution.

"But what we've got to do is look at the families, particularly those with younger children, and to see whether we can keep the families together in a home in a supervised way and prepare them for going home."

The full article contains 429 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 October 2008 10:27 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Immigration and refugees
 
1

Number 6,

Germany 23/10/2008 11:59:44
I take it this policy will extend to all failed seekers in Englandshire to, or is it just in Scotland where they are to be released into an economy that can't possibly support them. Has no one noticed the severe financial constraints Scotland is under.

Will these people leap frog Scots waiting for accomadation?
How will they vet them to assess the threat of absconding, using what criteria?.

How many of them are convicted criminals ?.
2

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 23/10/2008 12:11:45
6 your spot on , whose house are they going to get and who foots the bill, plus every single one of then are criminals its illegal to enter any country without permission, and just before the people who love seeing scotland over run with criminals put YOUR hand in YOUR pocket and pay for this
3

sam the god,

23/10/2008 12:23:08
1 # 2

fair comments
4

IainA,

Edinburgh 23/10/2008 12:54:09
#1 Number 6

Did you even bother to read the story before posting? Actually, no, forget that question. I can see you didn't.
5

Big T,

23/10/2008 12:57:53
I've a better idea.

If they have no legal entitlement to be here then send them back to where they came on the first available flight!

Cue protest from liberal do gooders who have brought our society to it's knees with their PC dross!!
6

Steve McGregor,

Dundee 23/10/2008 13:16:31
Oh...! Lord here we go again...

There are Asylum seekers who are in Britain waiting for deportation for over 10 years now. Realistically, these people cannot be deported yet the Government denies that fact. 10 years out of work would frustrate anyone, yet they are given (They deserve it) free housing and meal. It will cost millions to rehabilitate these people and turn them into work force again. Allow them to work NOW, as that is still the cheapest option.
7

Allan(handofgod137),

23/10/2008 13:34:20
#6 No, they should be sent home now!
8

Jay Kay,

23/10/2008 13:36:31
I'm with the Ozzies on this one don't bl**dy well let them in here in the first place and if they do get across the border then stick em back on the first boat out. In Oz if you break the maritime boundary the Coastguard are gona open fire on your a**

Why are we paying for these people, send them home, give scots the first chance at our own housing market.

Sorry to sound a bit harsh but to many doo gooders out there and far to many liberalists, religeous fanatics, Ill tell you what, try going for political asylum in say Saudi with a criminal reacord or history of known crime, you would be locked up and deported the same day, its time to get tough, I hear that all the bl**dy time but this labour government at Westmonster never actually seems to do anything about it, policies what bl**dy policies, full of empty promises and they want to run the government for another four flocking years, dont take the p*ss, how is Brown the Clown still in at number 10, answer me that! why, Ill tell you why because we the people of Britain, have gone soft in the ead.

Who knows why these people fail to meet the standards of the Asylum Seeker, but if they do, then that info should be made public, we can't just let these people become a part of our community, who knows what they have done in their own country, so to come here to abscond at will into the woods never to be seen again its madness, get them all out now.

This Country has become the dumping ground of Europe.

All being paid lovey social benefits and medicines, for christs sake we cant even help our own old folk and poor people, the number of beggars out on the streets of Edinburgh and Glasgow has risen dramatically in the last few years and the large percentage of them speak with a foreign accent or little or no English, and the softie doo gooders want to bring more in, thats it im leaving, flock it man this country is totally fooked.
9

Vandala,

23/10/2008 13:54:47
#9. Best of luck becoming an immigrant then.
10

danbob,

23/10/2008 14:43:25
House them in Easterhouse. They will be begging to go home within the week.
11

Rosscobhoy,

23/10/2008 16:39:48
A few weeks ago i posted on here that the whole credit crunch and recession thing was being used to create ill feeling towards immigrants and allow the government free reign to tackle a problem they don't know how to deal with. I'm slowly starting to think my drunken ramblings are close to the truth.
12

EnglishHighlander,

23/10/2008 17:08:08
#10 "House them in Easterhouse. They will be begging to go home within the week."

Ha, ha! My wife lived in Easterhouse when she was a nipper and some of the stuff she has told me makes my blood run cold!

Bloody good idea, 'though!
13

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 23/10/2008 17:44:17
Er, asylum seekers, both failed and those awaiting a decsion on there case, are currently housed by the council. What's the difference? They only go to Dungavel just before they're removed to the countries they belong to. Leave them not locked up but knowing they've reached the end of the line and surprise, surprise, they disappear.
14

The real dracula,

23/10/2008 18:21:28
I agree with the poster who said dont let illegals into the country in the first place. Never mind providing housing , food etc.

We cant even look after our own poor elderly and disabled so why are we taking in other countries problems.

If people want to enter the UK then thye should do so through the proper channels.

As for failed asylum seekers being here fo years , that is ridiculous.

We have all the bleeding heart liberals to thank for the immigration mess our country is in. Well done you lot anything else you can screw up.
15

Scythia,

Glasgow 23/10/2008 18:34:08
This morning on a radio Scotland phone-in , a lady and her 80 year old mother found herself evicted from her property due to a mortgage default. Unable to get council house support, she and her mum were sleeping in the floor at a relatives house. Another caller recalled a similar mortgage default, and was also excluded from council housing due to being (married but) childless. Both were in employment and presumably paying taxes.

Meantime the director of SHELTER tells us we have a chronic housing shortage in this country.

The Sunday Times (Scotland 19.10.08) reports FAILED asylum seekers are being supported in nearly every council area in Scotland.

The clocks are beginning to strike thirteen in this benighted land.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you feel concerned by the staff shortages in the city’s Indian restaurants?
No, I don’t really like Indian food
Yes, I think it will mean a fall in quality
They’re businessmen, they’ll find a way around it.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.