Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Migrants 'put strain on services'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 November 2008
HOSPITALS and schools in Scotland are facing "strains" from greater-than-predicted numbers of eastern European migrants, according to a new report.
The British Council-commissioned report, Migrant Cities, states that official predictions about levels of migration were wildly inaccurate, with about three times the estimated 60,000 eastern and central Europeans coming to Scotland.

The report,
which focuses on Glasgow, praises the local authority's efforts to integrate migrants.

But it also draws attention to potentially "serious role confusion" and "tensions" over funding arising from the fact that immigration is reserved to Westminster – but the provision of services such as education and health is down to Holyrood.

The report, written by academics at Strathclyde University, quotes John Donaldson, the head of immigration and emergency services at Glasgow City Council, who says: "Central government was wrong in estimating an influx of 60,000 migrants. It was really about 200,000.

"So there are strains for education and health, the politics is difficult, the local government wants more funding, but the central government doesn't want to admit they were wrong."

Glasgow City Council has responded "quickly and positively", recognising that the massive influx of migrants has helped to stem population decline, and boost the city's economic and cultural base.

But the report highlights serious housing problems. It recognises that overcrowding and exploitation of migrant communities has been "rife" in the Govanhill area.

One Slovak Roma, Katarina, 34, told researchers: "We don't even have hot water here. When I want to wash my baby, I have to heat up the water first."

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Our policies aim to help integrate migrant workers and their families into life in Scotland and to promote a more diverse labour market."



The full article contains 292 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 November 2008 9:24 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Immigration and refugees
 
1

glen urquhart,

glasgow 27/11/2008 00:31:50
I would like to ask what percentage of the Slovak community in Govanhill pay council tax?

How many of them work legally?

How many of them sell the Big Issue while housed?



2

Aileen,

27/11/2008 04:34:48
I remember one politician whose name escapes me, said 'come on in' to migrants because the Scottish population was dwindling. Well they are here, now what? They need to be given the opportunity of employment and proper housing and make a contribution to society, just like other people do when they move to another country.
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 27/11/2008 06:28:51
Look on the bright side, if the UK government cannot provide you with modern services and reasonable amount of unemployment benefit you can always move somewhere else. :~)
4

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 27/11/2008 07:26:27
It is well past time that we reconsidered the rules for migrants. We simply can't afford to support them.
I for one do not wish the tax I pay to be used to support these people, you can add in a lot of our own waters as well.
5

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 27/11/2008 07:27:04
waters - wasters !!
6

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 27/11/2008 10:03:42
#4 - I thought that Scottish nationalism wasn't like other nationalism in that there was no barrier to non indigenous peoples. Seems I was wrong, or lied to....
7

Scimitar1,

Increasingly crowded Central Belt 27/11/2008 11:01:41
If they aren't capable of supporting themselves then they shouldn't be here and that goes for them all. I have lived in countries across Europe and US and have never expected nor given help by any Govt or agency and therefore irrated at this. If taxes keep rising to pay for them then I (and no doubt others) will consider emigration to fairer taxpaying countries rendering their (dubious) immigration policy counter-productive.
8

Brad,

Glasgow 27/11/2008 11:05:18
#4 afford to support who, exactly? I know a few Poles, all of whom are working - sometimes in two jobs, receiving no benefits. Not all are like this - but then neither are all Scots.

Do you have the stats to show that recent migrants are a net drain on our (and their) taxes?
9

Brad,

Glasgow 27/11/2008 11:07:29
#7, "If they aren't capable of supporting themselves"

Who is "they"? Migrants? All of them? All the same are they? Well, plenty of them are supporting themselves. Maybe you just see them all as one dehumanised mass - as opposed to individual human beings?
10

Brad,

Glasgow 27/11/2008 11:08:41
#7, "I (and no doubt others) will consider emigration to fairer taxpaying countries".

Where were you thinking of? Somewhere that has fewer migrants than Scotland? That probably rules out most of the places you'd want to live. North Korea might suit you though.
11

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 27/11/2008 12:40:29
This is how it starts; the same old nationalism. First it's the ridiculous uninformed anti-English vitriol, but always prefaced by how they personally haven't anything against them, and now it's the immigrants.

As they used to say, "The (fill in the name of your particular ethnic bete noir here) are our misfortune"
12

ddmc,

27/11/2008 17:29:24
Easy solution to stop spongers of all nationalities...

In order to receive welfare benefit the receipient (or family member in case of school & further education leavers) needs to have paid into the welfare system for a minimum of 3-5 years. I'd make exclusions for basic & life threatening NHS care. But no cash or benefits in kind.
13

liuktest,

England 07/01/2009 19:44:48
hi,
I think only those people who are contributing really to the economy should be eligible for critical benefits only. If you see the process of ILR you will see that no one can claim benefits for two years, which is a good thing.
Thanks
http://www.liuktest.co.uk

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you feel concerned by the staff shortages in the city’s Indian restaurants?
No, I don’t really like Indian food
Yes, I think it will mean a fall in quality
They’re businessmen, they’ll find a way around it.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.