Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Coroner damns RAF and MoD over Hercules disaster that cost ten lives



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 October 2008
A CORONER at the inquest into the deaths of ten servicemen in a Hercules air crash has attacked the RAF for failing to fit a crucial safety feature that could have saved the crew.
Wiltshire coroner David Masters said the fact that the Ministry of Defence and RAF had not equipped the aircraft with ESF – explosion-suppressant foam – was a factor in the tragedy.

Had the aircraft's wing tanks been fitted with ESF, the men may w
ell be alive today, the inquest was told.

Last night, the victims' families accused the RAF of failing to protect men serving their country.

"The failure to fit ESF was, on the facts found, a serious systemic failure and a contributory factor in the loss of the aircraft," said Mr Masters. "There was a loss of opportunity for the survival of the crew by that failure."

Ruling that the men were unlawfully killed, the coroner highlighted the fact that intelligence was not passed on about a previous attack by insurgents on US Blackhawk helicopters on the same day in the same area.

Nine RAF personnel and one soldier died when the aircraft was shot down by enemy fire in Iraq in January 2005 – the largest loss of life to the RAF in a hostile act since the Second World War.

Among the coroner's recommendations was for all RAF combat aircraft to be fitted with fuel tank "inerting" systems – which do the same job as ESF.

Summing up at Trowbridge town hall, the coroner said the two-month hearing was hampered by a lack of data recording important decisions before the incident.

The criticism referred to an apparently unrecorded decision taken by RAF commanders not to fit the vital safety feature on Hercules aircraft, after they were advised to do so in a military research document in 2002.

The data only came to light after a document trawl while the inquest was adjourned over the summer.

The Hercules C-130K, flight XV179, from RAF Lyneham's 47 Squadron, was hit by insurgents after flying a special forces mission. Enemy fire pierced a fuel tank in the right wing, causing an explosion.

The plane crashed into the desert 25 miles north west of Baghdad. Witnesses told the inquest the crew was flying low, at about 150ft, to avoid the threat of surface-to-air missiles.

The 2002 report, sent to senior RAF figures, said Hercules wing tanks were the most vulnerable parts of the planes, liable to explode if hit by small-arms fire. And the report said a way to reduce the risk was to "retro-fit" the aircraft with "dynamic foam" for the wing fuel tanks – something that was not acted on until after the plane was shot down.

American Hercules have had ESF since the 1960s.

A major issue at the heart of the inquest was the failure to pass on intelligence warnings about the two US helicopters being shot at.

The inquest heard an e-mailed incident report was left unopened by an unnamed British intelligence officer.

Mr Masters said: "The system in place failed the captain and crew of that aircraft and this should never be allowed to happen again."

Concluding the inquest, Mr Masters told the families: "These men will never be forgotten. They were so brave, but so unlucky to die."

'They didn't protect our boys'

THE families of the Hercules crash victims said yesterday they felt their loved ones had been let down by the RAF.

Many sat in tears as the coroner, David Masters, made a series of recommendations after highlighting serious failures that contributed to the loss of the aircraft.

In emotional scenes after the case, the families said the "world will be watching" to see that the recommendations are followed.

Pauline Stead, the mother of David Stead, the Hercules captain, said: "We are truly disappointed that the RAF failed to protect our boys, who were all highly skilled and professional members of this crew and who were doing a very difficult job in a hostile terrain in the service of their country."

She said warnings about the aircraft's vulnerability went unheeded by many people for many years. However, she was comforted by the fact that all the Hercules fleet have now been fitted with ESF – explosion-suppressant foam.

"As a result of this, all aircrew and their passengers travelling in these aircraft now have the protection that David and his crew were denied.

"It is very sad that it took this tragedy to happen before anything was done."


Pilot: Failure to fit safety feature in aircraft 'criminal'

A FORMER Special Forces pilot yesterday branded "criminal" a failure by the Ministry of Defence and the RAF to fit a standard safety measure to the Hercules aircraft shot down in Iraq.

Nigel Gilbert, who used to fly Hercules and knew many of the crew, said after the inquest: "I'm lost for words. Anger just doesn't describe it."

The key safety modification that 47 Squadron's plane lacked was ESF, explosion-suppressant foam, which stops fuel tanks exploding if hit by enemy fire.

Evidence presented at the inquest showed senior British military figures were told about this vulnerability in 2002. But there was a failure to order ESF, or even tell the men on the front-line of the danger they were in. Mr Gilbert said: "This is not just incompetence; I think it was a deliberate decision not to provide that essential protection, a dereliction of duty."

He said he flew RAF Hercules in Afghanistan in 2002, unaware of its vulnerability to projectiles, or that "a single bullet could have brought it down".

He began campaigning for all UK Hercules to be fitted with ESF in January 2006, after being told that only five of the RAF's fleet of more than 45 were to be fitted.








The full article contains 979 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 October 2008 10:10 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

Postmark-55,

China, 23/10/2008 01:57:12
You need to pull your troops out immediately, and these things will not happen. The government and MoD could care less about their military personel, thus the illegal war and invasion of Iraq with the leaders sitting comfortably in their offices and homes while the troops and their families, let alone the innocent Iraqi citizens, suffer beyond what we can ever imagine.
War only produces loss.
2

Guga II,

Rockall 23/10/2008 06:56:26
Now that the MoD has been found responsible for unlawful killing of these servicemen, can we assume that the MoD and its then Secretary of State and all his minions, will be charged with Corporate Homicide (or, if in England, Corporate Manslaughter)?

In addition, all the war criminals responsible for sending troops to fight in illegal an unwinnable wars, i.e. Bliar, Broon and their respective cabinets, should also be charged with Corporate Homicide (in addition to facing war crimes trials).

3

Ubi,

Edinburgh 23/10/2008 08:09:29
Betrayed by a treacherous government that sends its men to war and spends the money on keeping itself in power.
4

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 23/10/2008 11:04:03
It really does amaze me when people who have no first hand knowledge of a subject are allowed to pass judgement on it.

It is tragic when our troops get killed but the circumstances should be investigated (if required) by the armed forces and the details released on a "need to know" basis. They have no idea how much damage they are doing to morale by splashing things like this all over the papers.

I remember the Falklands when our stupid press proudly reported that the fuses on the Argentine bombs were not set correctly and hence the bombs were bouncing off the decks of our ships without exploding. Guess what happened the next day? The bombs WERE set correctly, they DID explode, people were killed and ships were damaged.

Sometimes it is better to restrict information about the military to those who have a need to know it---which does not include the general public and chattering classes.
5

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 23/10/2008 11:35:09
#4, if I remember correctly, the Argentinian bombs were fused correctly anyway, it was simply that the pilots dropped them so close to their targets that the little propellor in the tail fin did not rotate enough times to fuse the bomb. A change in release height would have fixed that. Although this information was disseminated by the press, I'm not so sure that it was during the conflict, rather than after it.
More to the point, now that the ESF "secret" is out, it is unlikely to have any bearing on how the Taliban or Iraqi insurgents attempt to take down one of our aircraft.
Of more concern is the government's total disregard for our troops safety. While happy to spend billions of pounds to save our banks, because not doing so would be dangerous for our economy, they are not prepared to spend billions to save our troops(because in would be dangerous for the enemy?). We still have Westland Apache helicopters stuck in the UK because we don't have enough trained pilots for them. In the meantime, they are being cannibalised for spare parts to repair the few Apache choppers in Afganistan.
The government has already been castigated over the troops rescued from a minefield, because of a lack of the correct equipment.
If we are going to have a satnding army, navy and airforce, then we must equip them to fight and survive a war. If we decide never to engage in warfare again, then disband the lot. Half measures are not an option.
6

billengland,

23/10/2008 12:45:56
#4

I would say it would be a tremendous boost to the morale of our troops to know that the truth has come out and that they have someone batting on their side for once.

They have enough on with fighting a determined enemy without having to fight the enemy of our loathsome government and its cheeseparing MOD as well.

I may not support the war, but I support our troops. Keep up the good work lads and lasses!
7

JCA REID,

Annan 23/10/2008 13:28:39
It is ruddy typical of "Pusser". As an ex-Serviceman I can say this with no fear of contradiction it always sells its personnel short! No matter what branch!
8

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 23/10/2008 13:33:18
#5:

What you describe about the bombs is correct. The information about them not detonating was in fact released during the conflictn not afterwards.

#6:

"I would say it would be a tremendous boost to the morale of our troops to know that the truth has come out and that they have someone batting on their side for once."

That's one way of looking at it, however the other way of looking at it is that the enemy now know about potential shortcomings in our equipment.

The troops on the ground would have been aware of any shortcomings with their equipment---believe me. You don't go into life-threatening situations in the way they do without knowing things like that.

This is a military matter which should have remained a military matter. It is nothing to do with the general public, much less the enemy.
9

Postmark-55,

China, 23/10/2008 13:40:43
#4 Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,
With all respect to you, I've always enjoyed reading your opinions but this is a senseless and illegal war where all the innocent get killed or injured and for what? Is this war making the world a safer place? Are your troops there to defend your country? Your troops are there because Blair sold you out to the Yanks and Brown is more than willing to follow in Blair's footsteps. This war has nothing to do with anything except for Georgie boy avenging his Papa and luring your lot in there on under the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction. Thanks to this war there's terrible suffering endured by all those that have unwittingly gotten in the way and until you have your troops pulled out and tell the Yanks to do it on their own this will all continue to happen, just like that other slaughter pit called Afghanistan. Wars can't be won my friend, there's only loss on all sides.
10

Churchill W.,

23/10/2008 19:28:48
Guga II # 2

The government has not been found responsible for any unlawful kiiling of our servicemen, any more than you have. The people responsible are those who fired the anti-aircraft ammunition.
11

Taz,

The Land of the Free. 23/10/2008 22:19:25
I can't believe they did not blame us for it.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

After five years in Iraq, do you think we will be out of the country by 2013?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.