Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Iraq clears way for US troops to stay for three more years



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 November 2008
IRAQ'S parliament yesterday approved a security pact with the United States that lets American troops stay in the country for three more years, setting a clear timetable for a US exit for the first time since the 2003 invasion.
The vote in favour of the pact was backed by the ruling coalition's Shiite and Kurdish blocs as well as the largest Sunni Arab bloc, which had demanded concessions for supporting the deal. The haggling among the political factions highlighted sectari
an-based tensions that hinder reconciliation efforts, nearly six years after Saddam Hussein's fall.

The Shiite bloc agreed to a Sunni demand that the pact be put to a referendum by 30 July, meaning the deal must undergo an additional hurdle next year. It took nine months of difficult talks for US and Iraqi negotiators to craft the settlement.

Under the agreement, US forces will withdraw from Iraqi cities by 30 June and the entire country by 1 January, 2012. Iraq will have strict oversight over US forces.

MPs voted with a show of hands, and an exact breakdown of the parliamentary vote was not immediately available. But parliament speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani said an "overwhelming majority" of MPs who attended the session voted in favour.

Parliament's secretariat, who counted MPs as they entered the chamber, said 220 out of 275 legislators attended.

"This is a historic day for parliament," said deputy speaker Khalid al-Attiyah, a close ally of the prime minister Nouri al- Maliki. "More than three-quarters of those present at today's session voted for the agreement, and that was not expected."

Mr Maliki appeared to have won the comfortable majority that he sought in order to give the agreement additional legitimacy.

The country's most influential Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, had indicated that the deal would be acceptable only if passed by a comfortable majority.

Ali al-Dabbagh, a government spokesman urged those who opposed the agreement to accept the decision by the parliament.

"Iraqis should now feel that they have the control and they have to take the full responsibility" for security, he said. "Even those who reject this share the responsibility in order to reform the country and in order to stabilise the country."

Sunni MPs, whose group dominated Iraq under Saddam but now struggles for influence with the Shiite-led government, said they were reluctant to support the security deal. "Our conditional approval does not mean that we do not have reservations on many causes mentioned in the agreement and we do not have fear about the future implementation of the agreement," said MP Salim Abdullah, who is also a spokesman for the largest Sunni bloc in parliament, the 44-seat Iraqi Accordance Front.

A bloc of 30 MPs loyal to the anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who wants US forces to leave Iraq immediately, chanted protests and hoisted banners that said "No, no to the agreement" during the 25-minute session. "We offer our condolences to the Iraqi people for this humiliating pact and will continue our popular rejection of it," said Sheik Hazim al-Aaraji, an aide to Sadr.


Baghdad controls American troops

FOR the first time since United States-led forces invaded Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003, Iraq's government will have control over the 150,000 US troops operating there. American troops will no longer be able to raid houses, kill or capture suspected militants, or drop bombs, unless Iraqi authorities approve their missions.

The US military will also have to hand over the estimated 16,000-17,000 prisoners they hold to the Iraqi authorities.

Washington must withdraw every last US soldier by the end of 2011. But the last US soldier could conceivably leave earlier, if the security situation in the country allows for it.

Violence has fallen to some of its lowest levels since after the invasion. Sunni tribal leaders have joined US forces to rout al-Qaeda militants. The once powerful Mahdi army militia of Muqtada al-Sadr has been disbanded – for now.

But US commanders stress all these gains are fragile and could be reversed if Iraq does not continue with progress towards reconciliation between feuding factions. Militants still carry out lethal bomb attacks across Iraq every day.



The full article contains 720 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2008 10:13 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 28/11/2008 00:23:06
Wonder who they will start a war with just after that date or just before that date. They've already got their sights set on Iran so it's pointless bringing all the troops and equipment home first, might as well "Shock and Awe" Iran while they are there, and then probably move on to Syria.
2

Casey J.,

The US of A 28/11/2008 02:05:12
Well it still has to be passed by a comfortable majority, that could pose a problem. We should remove all our troops from Iraq and shift them to Afghanistan
3

Zeba,

USA and Israel 28/11/2008 02:49:36
#2
Better still, double the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and launch a full scale assault on Iran. We need to remove their president immediately and damn the consequences. This maniac wants to destroy Israel but if he tries we'll nuke him to kingdom come
4

L. Bannerman,

The Bronx 28/11/2008 04:46:09
#3 Zeba
More stupid comments from a warmonger like our president Bush
5

Finnking,

Lempäälä 28/11/2008 05:20:14
Zeba

Iraq is already a mess, after 5 years of US terror/authority.

Afghanistan is a mess, after 7 years of US terror/authority.

Both of these countries were effectively 3rd world with little organised resistance to the US led attacks; IE no standing armies to fight.

So, having failed completely to invade those two weak countries, you seriously suggest that the US should now take on a real power?

The "maniac", as you call him, wants to rid the area of Zionism and has accepted the idea of an Israeli state. There are many in Israel itself that want a similar outcome.
6

Royc,

London 28/11/2008 07:34:28
"Afghanistan is a mess, after 7 years of US terror/authority.

Both of these countries were effectively 3rd world with little organised resistance to the US led attacks; IE no standing armies to fight."

The decision to invade Afghanistan, in order to remove Mullah Omar and the Taleban, was taken by the UN Security Council. The UN passed the job to NATO and there are 30 countries with troops there. The ISAF commander rotates on a 6-month basis and has been British, Turkish, German, French, Italian and American.

It is NOT a US operation Finnking, it's a UN one.

The reason there was no resistance to ISAF troops is because most Afghanis were only too happy to see the back of the austere Taleban regime and its sociopath Al Qaida mates. The Taleban recruits among the Pashtun but they represent 36-42% of the people - and most of them don't want the Talibs back. The other ethnic groups, the Tajik, Uzbek, Hazara, etc, fought the Talibs, were savagely treated by them and are fighting them today in Afghan army uniforms.

The Talibs have minority support, which is why they need their Pathan cousins from Pakistan to come and invade southern Afghanistan and chuck bombs at school teachers and kids.

But don't let the facts get in the way of a good leftie rant, eh Finnking. You want to read a little more about the subject though.
7

Number 6,

Germany 28/11/2008 07:59:30
And has this plan been cleared by Obama ?. I think people will find he wants the troops out long before 3 years. As for poor old Zeba, i'm afraid his/her blood lust will have to be put on hold under this new president.

Israal should concentrate on their home grown mafia which is currently bombing it's way around Israel.
Also the rise in the number of jewish Nazis gangs should be a bigger concern than an imaginery bomb.


This is what you breed when you make violence a cornerstone of your society.
8

Finnking,

Lempäälä 28/11/2008 10:37:31
Royc

If I decide to have a party on board a ship and invite lots of friends there, it's my party. The UN doesn't instigate war in itself; it requires security council agreement to do so, an agreement usually based upon a proposal by one of the permanent five (who can all veto).


However, contrary to your assertion, the UNSC did not sanction Operation Enduring Freedom and it was not a NATO operation.It US and 'uk' bombing attack followed by invasion. Also, you will find (should you actually look) that the plans to attack Afghanistan were in place prior to 911. So 911 cannot be used as justification.

If you are saying that the legality of the attack comes under Article 51 of the UN charter under the guise of "act of aggression", then, again, I suggest you find that document and read it carefully. If you twist the facts to ensure that Article 51 is valid in this case, then you must apply the same reasoning to other "acts of aggression"; especially the US ones. Remember that the Taliban offered to hand over OBL twice using normal extradition requirements; trifling things like 'evidence', things that the US couldn't supply.

So, no UN backing was given, USA and 'uk' attacked and NATO wasn't involved. It's a US party.

And you have the gall to write, "But don't let the facts get in the way of a good leftie rant, eh Finnking. You want to read a little more about the subject though."

Who's laughing now?
9

,

28/11/2008 16:10:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

28/11/2008 16:10:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

28/11/2008 21:34:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

29/11/2008 01:34:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

29/11/2008 02:14:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

29/11/2008 02:43:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

29/11/2008 03:19:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

29/11/2008 03:35:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Rowdy Roy,

29/11/2008 03:40:52
#16

Your another one of Lynne's IDs

Where's your comment on the topic at hand?
18

,

29/11/2008 04:06:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

29/11/2008 04:25:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

29/11/2008 04:49:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

POSTMARK--55,

29/11/2008 13:19:56
#19, get a life troll.
22

,

29/11/2008 13:31:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Lynne,

29/11/2008 20:03:07
It's out of hand.. and really a sorry case for someone who keeps claiming I am all these people.. Rowdy Roy (Rat Boy) is just another nutjob, with nothing to contribute but lies and garbage. He probably does all this himself (as trolls usually do.)
He should go back to FH with the other trolls.
24

POSTMARK--55,

30/11/2008 01:19:12
#17 Rowdy Roy

I do not agree with anything Lynne has to say but she is not a troll like you.
25

,

30/11/2008 02:05:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Edward M. Kennedy,

30/11/2008 04:16:39
#25 Rowdy Roy

Left Wing Nut Job. Lynne only has one ID, stop trolling the Scotsman and find a girlfriend.
27

,

30/11/2008 04:47:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

30/11/2008 04:53:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

Lynne,

30/11/2008 05:44:34
Edward M. Kennedy..laughable isn't it? Anytime someone says that I amo only 1 ID.. they become another of my multiple IDs!!! The guy needs help, he really does. He is a cyber stalker, and the more people answer him, the longer this is going to take.
My advice? Let the moron have his fun, let him continue to make an a** out of himself. Sooner or later everyone will see what he is. (all those but HIS other IDs).
The nutjub is totally off the wall. He contributes nothing, but insults and slurs. Forget it.. it in not worth anyone elses time to bother with him.
Thanks for sticking up for me though.!!
30

POSTMARK,-55,

30/11/2008 07:53:44
#29 Lynne,
This was my response to Edward M, Kennedy.


Edward M. Kennedy,
Like I advised Lynne before, if she only uses one ID then she needs to shrug the accusations off. I too only use one ID but there's someone amongst us who likes to copy ID's, well a close copy, and give us a bad name.
I sincerely believe that Lynne only goes by one ID, I seldom if ever agree with her but her opinions are just that, her opinions and she's entitled to them whether I agree with her or not. What the imposter is doing is illegal and slanderous and the Scotsman can be held accountable in a court of law if someone should pursue the matter. Why the Scotsman doesn't have something in place to prevent this is beyond me but they're playing with fire. They're awful quick to delete posts though and that I don't understand. I've had many posts removed for the simple fact that someone disagrees with my point of view and that is wrong. Racism of course needs to be deleted but should be checked before being allowed to hit print, just like fowl language doesn't get past the censors.
The Scotsman uses a lazy and unprofessional approach and relies on machines and not humans to do the checking, therefore all this garbage slipping through.

And #24 is another rip-off of my ID.
31

,

30/11/2008 14:18:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

,

30/11/2008 15:05:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

,

30/11/2008 15:37:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
34

,

30/11/2008 15:46:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

Ardanaiseig,

Scotland 30/11/2008 16:04:37
#34 Vida Dosa

Rowdy Roy has been making an a** out of himself for several days now, I wish he would just go away.
36

,

30/11/2008 16:15:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

,

30/11/2008 16:18:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

,

30/11/2008 16:19:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
39

,

30/11/2008 16:21:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

,

30/11/2008 16:33:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

,

30/11/2008 16:42:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

,

30/11/2008 16:45:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

,

30/11/2008 16:55:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

,

30/11/2008 16:56:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

30/11/2008 17:03:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

Regina,

NH, USA 30/11/2008 18:02:41
The terrorist appeasers must be hating life thinking we would be out in 6-9 months.
47

Regina,

NH, USA 30/11/2008 18:06:11
#45 Vida Dosa

I think there are probably only 1 or 2 left wing idiots like Rowdy Roy making all this trouble on the forums. I’ll be the next Lynne or you according to these idiots.
48

,

30/11/2008 22:04:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
49

,

30/11/2008 22:05:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

,

30/11/2008 23:10:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

,

30/11/2008 23:21:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

After five years in Iraq, do you think we will be out of the country by 2013?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.