<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Jackson's ex-wife backs off in custody fight over children</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com/template/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=6985&amp;ArticleID=5429064&amp;format=rss#comments</link>
<description>Comments on "Jackson's ex-wife backs off in custody fight over children"</description>
<language>en-gb</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Johnston Press PLC</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:45:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<ttl>5</ttl>
<item>
<title>Posted by Sandi, San Diego</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189395</link>
<description><![CDATA[#2 Dylan fan,

The two older children are Debbie Rowe's natural children. She is their biological mother and has said that she will undergo DNA testing to prove it if necessary. IN California, MJ did not have to adopt children born to his wife during their marriage. He was their father. Period.

#3 James(1)

I'm sure the Jackson family, almost every one of them, wants MJ's money more than Debbie Rowe. The entire, seriously dysfunctional, family is broke, other than Janet, La Toya and another sister who is married to a businessman. Jermaine is a lewd joke. Marlon is working stocking shelves in a supermarket. All these nutters would have constant access and influence over the kids. MJ himself had nothing to do with any of them except his mother. So, what is best for the children? That is what the family court will address.]]></description>
<guid>/latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189395</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by James (1)</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189313</link>
<description><![CDATA[It was a misunderstanding by Debbie. She thought the person said who is going to look after Michael's quids.]]></description>
<guid>/latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189313</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Dylan fan, Planet earth</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189119</link>
<description><![CDATA[
It is very complicated.  She was his wife, but not the biological mom of the kids...Neither was he the bio=dad.They were divorced.  She had visitation..Looks like she could have a good chance of custody.  She would come before the grandparents..in custody rights.  But then they were never really adopted??? by Jackson? She is right to keep them away from any person she fears would harm them.  It's a quagmire!
RIP Michael.]]></description>
<guid>/latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4189119</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:50:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Zapper</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4188079</link>
<description><![CDATA[Debbie has decided to wait until the funeral is over. How very decent of her.]]></description>
<guid>/latestnews/Jackson39s-exwife-backs-off-in.5429064.jp#comment4188079</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>