Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 26th November 2009

Tribute to Britain's last 'witch'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 October 2006
SHE was the last person in Britain to be tried as a witch - in a 1944 case Winston Churchill called "obsolete tomfoolery".
Her ability to inform relatives about loved ones who had died abroad during the Second World War led to her family being demonised. Even 54 years later, then-Home Secretary Jack Straw refused to grant her a posthumous pardon.

But now Helen Duncan is to receive a special mention in a ceremony to remember 81 people from Prestonpans who were killed during the witchcraft trials of the 16th and 17th century.

Ms Duncan, who lived in Niddrie at the time but travelled the country putting on seances for relatives, was convicted in 1944 under the 1735 Witchcraft Act for "pretending to raise the spirits of the dead". She was sentenced to nine months in Holloway prison.

Her granddaughter, Mary Martin, 72, from Craigmillar, who will lead tomorrow's ceremony at the Prestoungrange Gothenburg pub in Prestonpans High Street, said: "I still remember it. My brother and I were at school at the time and it was awful, we got called names like demon child.

"It's still upsetting thinking about it. The whole family were devastated. When she came home she seemed to have lost all her will to live, she was never the same again. I am so proud of her - she did nothing wrong. I loved that lady and I still miss her after all these years."

She said her grandmother should never have been tried under the ancient law.

"She was arrested and tried for witchcraft, but she wasn't a witch. It was farcical.

"She was a spiritualist, and at the time they were getting tried for vagrancy. If that had happened she would have got a fine."

The ceremony - the only one of its kind in the UK - is now in its third year. It was started following the pardoning of the Prestonpans witches in 2004 by the Baron of Prestoungrange.

Although Ms Duncan lived in Niddrie, she could not be pardoned by the Baron, as she was tried in Portsmouth.

However, her case is so well known she is being included as a special guest to mark the 50th anniversary.

Kristine Cunningham, from Prestoungrange Arts Festival, which is organising the event, said: "It will be a sombre occasion. We want to focus on the injustice so people know what happened to her."

Campaigners are trying to clear her name through the European Courts. Her story was made into a Channel Four drama documentary in 1999 and at one stage there was talk of a Hollywood film.

It was in Portsmouth in 1941 that she claimed to have been contacted by a sailor from the HMS Barham, who said the ship had been torpedoed.

The Government was yet to reveal the details for fear it would affect morale.

The War Office feared Ms Duncan could also see and reveal the secret site chosen for the imminent D-Day landing, and the top-secret Enigma operation to break German codes.

So it was decided to try her under the ancient law, which had not been tried for more than 200 years. Ms Duncan had many famous clients, including Winston Churchill.

As prime minister, he repealed the Witchcraft Act in 1951, recognising spiritualism as a religion. Despite this, a seance Ms Duncan held in Nottingham in 1956 was still raided by police.

She was in a trance at the time and was grabbed by police officers. It was this which supporters claimed killed her.

Mrs Martin said the interference of the trance when her grandmother was grabbed caused ectoplasm - a whitish, pliable substance said to take the shape of spirits and enable the dead to communicate - to recoil back into the body causing severe burns. She added: "When we saw her body it was covered in burns"

Mrs Martin said she would continue to fight on in the hope of clearing her grandmother's name.

Factfile

Helen Duncan was born in Callender on November 26, 1897. She married a cabinetmaker, who was disabled after suffering an injury in the First World War.

The couple moved to Dundee then Edinburgh. Mrs Duncan fell pregnant 12 times but only six children survived.

Her first brush with the law was in 1933, when she was found guilty at an Edinburgh court of practising as a false medium.

During the Second World War Helen travelled the country carrying out seances.

In 1941, she alarmed the authorities when she told a seance in Portsmouth about attacks on the British warships Hood and Barham before their losses had been made public.

Three years later one of her seances was raided by the police and Navy.

She was charged with conspiracy, which was a hanging offence, but it was later dropped to contravening the Witchcraft Act of 1735 by pretending to raise the spirits of the dead.

A bid by her lawyers to get Mrs Duncan to perform a seance in court was rejected.

A total of 44 witnesses, including a justice of the peace and journalists, spoke in her defence, but she was still found guilty and sentenced to nine months at Holloway.

During her time in jail, Mrs Duncan received many visitors, including Winston Churchill. She was released on September 22, 1944.

Mrs Duncan died in 1956 after allegedly being assaulted by two police officers during a seance and was cremated at Warriston Crematorium.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 October 2006 9:50 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Budgie,

Kirkcaldy 28/10/2006 13:09:10

This lady was treated in a despicable way. She had a special talent, which, if she were alive today, would have resulted in her having her own T.V. show.

2

josh,

edinburgh 28/10/2006 14:18:36

At least Winston Churchill acted honourably even if others did not.

3

billengland,

england 28/10/2006 14:59:10

A fine example of state interference. She did no harm and a lot of good, and will always be remembered for that. RIP.

4

Faye,

Scotland 28/10/2006 15:59:59

I have reservations about seances and all of this but I do realise that some people really believe in this sort of stuff. Clearly there must have been something in it. The fact the State became involved is indicative that she had something worthwhile investigating.

What's sad is the treatment she received. Her family deserve to remember her for all the good things she represented and perhaps this ceremony helps that process. If some had listened would those men lost on the Hood and Barham still be alive?

5

Dorothy,

England 28/10/2006 16:43:29

What a shame she died in that way. I have friends who have visited mediums and have commented on how accurate they have been.

6

John,

Canada 28/10/2006 16:44:22

Jack Straw refused a pardon! How could one of the, allegedly. more intelligent members of Parliament come to such a conclusion?


PS: My ex-wife was a witch.

7

Paul Voltiare,

28/10/2006 17:30:18

There does appear to be a strong case for a pardon & I hope her family do not lose heart & that some form of justice will be done to Mrs. Duncan, who should never have suffered like this.

8

Paul Voltaire,

28/10/2006 18:45:18

Re-: Britain's last 'witch'

They obviously don't know about my mother-in-law

(c) L. Dawson 1975

9

eric,

28/10/2006 19:52:23

Dont you Think madonna has quite enough attention for One week:p

10

Lynn,

Madison, Wisconsin, USA 28/10/2006 20:40:04

What a lovely turn of phrase: "She fell pregnant". I wonder, if one has "fallen" pregnant, is one still pregnant when one gets up from one's fall?

However, that is neither here nor there.

The best to this lady's family, and I hope that there come a day when she gets the pardon she so richly deserves.

11

EnEm,

Edinburgh 28/10/2006 23:31:04

What a lot of nonsense everyone talks about this.

Helen Duncan was NOT convicted of being a witch or any such thing. If anything, the opposite was true. She was convicted, essentially, for FRAUD. PRETENDING to have the ability to communicate with the dead when she didn't. The crime was one of making a living out of dishonesty and exploitation of a lie. It doesn't deserve the attention it gets.

12

jnisbet,

USA 29/10/2006 02:09:55

From the late 16th century through the early 18th century, you could be burned to death if you were perceived by the public to be a witch or if you were perceived by the public as pretending to be a witch, thereby "deceiving the publick."

Real witch or pretend witch, the sentence was the same, and a death sentence, whether delivered by a court of law or during a 1956 incidence of police harrassment, has the same result -- but 200+ years after the last "witch" was burned in Scotland, in Dornoch, in 1727. Her name was Janet Horne.

On another yet resonant note, my maternal Grandmother, with a few of her cronies, ran a Spiritualist Church during the 1950s and '60s, on Edinburgh's Picardy Place. They called their church "The Haven," ands far as I know it was never raided by the Edinburgh police. My Grannie was also cremated at Warriston Crematorium.

If there is anyone who has any personal recollections of this church, which either met weekly or monthly, you can contact me through my website.

Picardy Place, by the way, is near where Arthur Conan Doyle, another avowed Spritualist and the creator of Sherlock Holmes, lived. He is considered a national treasure. Janet Horne, Helen Duncan, and my Grandmother are not.

Jeff

http://www.mythomorph.com

13

jnisbet,

USA 29/10/2006 04:06:15

Although it is not made entirely clear in the article, it should be remembered that the "50th anniversary" memorialised at Prestoungrange is not the anniversary of Helen Duncan's trial, but of her death.

It should also be remembered that, as mentioned in the article, "Ms Duncan had many famous clients, including Winston Churchill," presumably before her trial. It is not mentioned in the article whether Winston was one of the 44 witnesses who "spoke in her defense." I suspect he was not, since they are described as "including a justice of the peace and journalists." If Winston had been one of the 44 he would certainly have been mentioned in the article, no?

"As prime minister," the article says, Winston "repealed the Witchcraft Act in 1951, recognising spiritualism as a religion."

Hallelujah!

To Neil of Edinburgh, comment #11, who had this to say:

"Helen Duncan was NOT convicted of being a witch or any such thing. If anything, the opposite was true. She was convicted, essentially, for FRAUD. PRETENDING to have the ability to communicate with the dead when she didn't. The crime was one of making a living out of dishonesty and exploitation of a lie. It doesn't deserve the attention it gets."

To that I would just say this:

Winston Churchill, as one of her "many famous clients," did not think she was a fraud, and neither did the War Office, as explained in the article that you seem not to be willing to plumb the depths of. Nevertheless, she was sentenced to nine months in jail, after which, according to her granddaughter, "she seemed to have lost all her will to live, she was never the same again."

So what are you saying, Neil? That her sentence was just?

I think it was just convenient ...

Jeff

http://www.mythomorph.com

14

Andrew Crummy,

Prestonpans 29/10/2006 07:15:41

To answer Neil.

We have a copy at The Gothenburg, you can get it on the internet, a letter by Winston Churchill, commenting on the witchcraft act and Helen Duncan.

But that is not really the point. Through the witchcraft act many women and men were cruelly treated. In particular, the 81 from Prestonpans. It is all documented and sadly true. It is a horrific and truly sad story.

15

Pete39,

Tasmania 29/10/2006 08:44:55

There are many men and women in Scotland who hold what is called a second sight. Helen Duncan chose to demonstrate her abilities. In some cases it is a situation where you exchange forgiveness in death, my own experience. I would think that she was more aware than others.

16

daveserviceman,

Edinburgh 29/10/2006 09:26:13

no 6 : there are no inteligent members of parliament in england or scotland one of the qualifications of being an mp is to be dishonnerable and brain dead

17

CRUSADER,

29/10/2006 09:35:03

The many storys you read about inconnent people being tried and convicted of witch craft should be a lesson to us all. Just recentley i cam across a story by accident while searching in the Kinghorn archives of a girl who was tried and put to death for wait for it "covorting behind a hill with the Devil dressed as a man"
The total number people tried and put to death for witch craft must be thousands

18

a. w,

29/10/2006 09:52:27

I think neil is correct, she has not been convicted for being a witch, but for pretending to raise the spirits of the dead. Whether she should have got a 9 month sentence is another matter-lots of people have occupations which are a bit dubious, but dont end up in prison for it-and it depends on the cultural beliefs and values of the time whether they hold any currency or not-hers obviousley did.

However I dont see why the fact that Winston Churchill was a client, has anything to do with it.

19

Abdul Rahman Khan,

London 29/10/2006 11:05:07

Paul Voltaire your comment is hilariously rib-tickling which made me burst into laughter. Brother you have spoken nothing but a widely-recognized universal truth. By the way, does your wife (or partner) browse this section of the newspaper? If she does, you better take home some flowers for her to neutrize the 'side effects' of "how dare you say such silly remarks about my mom?".

20

Doreen,

The Ether 29/10/2006 11:52:14

Not sure about the 'ectoplasm' probably had a heart attack when the coppers burst in and grabbed her in the 'right love your coming wae us' fashion. Whether she was or wasnt a witch (what a silly word) is irrelevent, she obviously pissed somebody off and they wanted her huckeld away. Its a case of the majority persecuting the minority, thats why they victimised and burnt us to death in the past. Only a male god could be hijacked to carry out that crusade. Can you imagine if the tables had been turned and she was still worshipped,

"Whit! whit d'ye mean yer no a witch! get doon that witch school and get some o' thae spells under yer belt or its the Christian ducking stool for you pal, any mer o' yer cheek and I'l singe yer erse fur ye!"

21

Paul Voltiare,

30/10/2006 02:42:25

Neil #11 - this subject obviously does deserve the attention it gets, otherwise you wouldn't be giving it your attention. Hypercrite or what ?

22

Paul Voltiare,

30/10/2006 02:49:23

#8 voltaire, your remark is derogatory,cheap and insensitive. If you can't say anything constructive, then remain silent.

23

Budgie,

Glasgow. 30/10/2006 11:57:12

Post 8, Paul Voltaire.

I must be married to your wife's sister!

24

jnisbet,

USA 30/10/2006 14:01:07

Post 11, Bupf.

If you read the article again, this time with comprehension, you might just conceivably come to the understanding that Helen Duncan was sent to jail because she revealed information that had not yet been made public, and which she should have had no way of knowing -- except by either conspiring with the enemy, or by genuine second sight.

The original conspiracy charge was reduced, as the article says, "to contravening the Witchcraft Act of 1735 by pretending to raise the spirits of the dead."

Your post puts forth the idea that "this woman was a fraud, pulling cheap tricks for people longing for news of their loved ones." While this may comfort you, the case was not so simple.

Do you think that Winston Churchill, who was just one of Helen Duncan's many famous clients, could have been so easily fooled by mere parlour tricks? I seem to recall that he showed a certain amount of intelligence when he led the country during WWII, no?

Jeff

http://www.mythomorph.com

25

jnisbet,

USA 30/10/2006 15:05:55

I give up, Bupf.

Your last incisive point has beaten me fair and square.

Well played!

Jeff

26

jnisbet,

USA 30/10/2006 19:01:28

... and here I was, foolishly thinking you might at least be able to recognize the not-so-subtle difference between surrender and sarcasm.

Silly me!

27

Margaret,

Greenock 30/10/2006 23:12:42

I hope the European Court has the decency to give Helen Duncan the pardon she deserves and I wish her family all the best for the future

28

jnisbet,

USA 31/10/2006 00:43:07

Thank you, Helen, for elevating this conversation to a higher level. Much appreciated.

The wreath that Helen Duncan's granddaughter is holding in the above photo looks like it was made by the same hand as the floral arrangements periodically placed at Edinburgh's little known memorial to the "witches" who were burned on the Castle Hill during the great Scottish witch hunts.

Known as "The Witches' Well," this modest memorial is attached to the west wall of the gift shop on the north side of the street as one enters the Castle Esplanade -- a building that I believe once housed an indoor reservoir. The floral arrangements, I seem to recall, began to appear there as a deterant to using the well as a rubbish receptacle.

The well is invisible to tourists on their way onto the esplanade and, heads full of the wonders they have just seen in the castle, is understandably easy to miss as they leave.

May I suggest to the city executive that a more visible location might be long overdue.

I would like to applaud the Baron of Prestoungrange for pardoning the local witches a couple of years ago, while he still had the power under the now-abolished rights of Baronial law. The other barons, with the exception of Dolphinstoun, I think, missed the deadline. Though cold comfort to the witches, mostly women, who were tortured and burned during the Scottish hunts, it was the very best that he could do within the powers still then available to him, so he did it.

Here is a link to the 28 October 2004 Scotsman story about the Baron's pardon, still readable under the "Spooky Stories" section of this newspaper's archive of articles relating to Scotland's "Heritage & Culture."

http://heritage.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=623&id=12...

I am rightly proud of my Scottish heritage and the city I spent my

29

jnisbet,

USA 31/10/2006 00:53:33

Sorry, Margaret, for calling you Helen.

30

Angus Og,

Scottish Borders 31/10/2006 10:26:12

If I hadn't read it here, I would have said unbelieveable.

My late mother was peculiarly linked to her relatives.

On a visit to her grandmother at the age of 12 while waiting for the train to take them 40 miles to Granny's town, she said "Granny's dead, so there's no point in going" - Granny was later found to have died at the same time that my mother made the remark.

I know lots of people who know things that they can't possibly know, and they're usually right.

I know when someone rings, who is ringing and about what.

This has obviously existed since time immemorial and to decry it as fraud or witchcraft, or to mask it as religion is ridiculous.

31

Kay,

Fife 31/10/2006 23:56:58

Like you, Peter, I believ that there is something in this. I have often had a sense of deja vu in certain situations.

I remember when I applied for a job (my first job after school), I had a dream, wherein one of the people I would be working with came forward to shake my hand and welcome me to the firm. I remember waking up thinking that it was a weird dream as I hadn't even met the person. Two days later I went for the interview, and this happened exactly as in my dream, even down to the clothes the person was wearing.

Other small things have happened too, that I have a feeling were going to happen, but not for a while - perhaps it is a gift that I have lost through lack of use.

I hesitate to use the term "premonition", but that is the only way I can explain it.

Incidentally, my daughter has often been heard talking to her dai (grandfather) who died in the 1980s. She's also spoken to her both her grandmother and step-grandmother who have both passed over. They do say that children are more susceptible to seeing spirits, but that we grow out of it as we get older, apart from those who apparently have the "gift" and make use of it.

It is comforting to know also, that these loved ones are around and that they are watching over us.

32

gnosys,

Los Angeles 01/11/2006 03:47:02

The magician and champion of science James Randi has a standing offer of one million dollars to anyone who can show evidence of any paranormal, supernatural or psychic power or event. To date no one has passed even the preliminary tests. Naturally all sorts of excuses are offered -- one can't perform in a laboratory environment, the spirits are offended by the indignity of a "test," etc. But you'd think professional psychics who perform on a nightly basis must be used to working under less than ideal circumstances and this would be easy money for one or another of them... unless of course they're all frauds. (http://www.randi.org/research/index.html)

One can't rule out the existence of psychic phenomena, of course, but it's important to recognize how easy it is for any of us to be fooled.

33

jnisbet,

USA 01/11/2006 05:45:19

According to the article we're discussing, "a bid by her lawyers to get Mrs Duncan to perform a seance in court was rejected."

We are not talking about a "test" of a paranormal event, here, anymore, no matter what the prize. We are now talking about why Winston Churchill, a client of Helen Duncan, did not testify at her trial, and would wait until 1951 to repeal, as Prime Minister, the Witchcraft Act.

There are clearly deeper depths to be plumbed, here, than Randi's gamble, though it seems that even the people at Prestoungrange are tired of this conversation.

Perhaps they have been busy with Halloween festivities.

Jeff

34

J,

Edinburgh 03/11/2006 09:16:46

Is it not possible for a petition to be set up to have this lady pardoned. Maybe Andrew can answer?

35

Andrew Crummy,

03/11/2006 12:51:49

well yes to a petition. Maybe an online one as so many are around the world.

36

glenny,

kirkcaldy, fife. 25/11/2008 18:03:07
i think this was a terrible injustice, rest in peace
37

Big_les,

Edinburgh 29/12/2008 22:08:01
Contrary to claims here, there is no evidence at all that Churchill was a client of Duncan's. The document in the National Archives suggests only that he was annoyed at the use of archaic legislation against a petty criminal. The effort gone to suggests that the authorities were indeed concerned that Duncan's "loose lips" might actually "sink ships". Or at least strike blows against morale at home.

You can see that as wrong, or as a necessary measure in time of war. Or, as I tend to think of it, as jobsworths taking things too far against a petty criminal.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.