Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 26th November 2009

Crofting body 'should be scrapped' after half a century, says professor

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 May 2008
THE body set up to oversee and develop crofting should be wound up after more than 50 years, a radical report published yesterday recommends.
An inquiry under rural policy expert Professor Mark Shucksmith says the regulation and development functions of the Crofters' Commission should be given to a federation of crofting boards and Highlands and Islands Enterprise.

The 98-page report, s
een as the most important for crofting in half a century, aims to ensure that all crofts are occupied by an active, resident crofter.

It proposes tightening and simplifying legislation to crack down on absenteeism and the sale of crofts on the open market, while improving grants to make it easier for people to get into crofting and access affordable housing.

The changes would cost an extra £1 million a year, with a one-off cost of £3 million to set up the first register of crofts. The proposals will be debated in Parliament on Thursday.

Michael Russell, the environment minister, yesterday said crofting makes a unique and significant contribution to remote rural areas and action must ensure it offers a viable way of life for future generations.

During interviews with over 2,500 people, the committee heard the Crofters' Commission, set up in 1955, should be more accountable and enforce regulations more effectively.

It now suggests regulation be carried out by a Federation of Crofting Boards, a single body made up of seven to ten local boards each with a majority of elected crofters.

There are presently 17,725 crofts and an estimated 11,500 crofters. Most crofts are handed down among families, but recently it has become common to sell to the highest bidder.

The committee was told if this continues, crofting could disappear within 20 years.

It now recommends tying all crofts to residency, even after they are sold or assigned. It also wants a crackdown on absenteeism – with nearly 1,800 registered tenants classified as absentees – to free up more land.

The committee says crofters' rights of security of tenure and fair rents will continue, but argues they should only be enjoyed by those who want to use the land.

The report also highlights difficulties in accessing affordable housing with property prices rising by 58-85 per cent between 2001 and 2005.

Currently, crofters can obtain grants of just £11,000-£22,000, but usually need an extra commercial loan.



The committee proposes offering means-tested grants of up to £30,000 and non means-tested loans.

Neil MacLeod, the chairman of the Scottish Crofting Foundation, said that he was pleased the committee had recognised the social, economic and environmental importance of crofting.

However, Rob Gibson, a Highlands and Islands Nationalist MSP, said that scrapping the commission was a blow for local democracy.

John Farquhar Munro, the Liberal Democrat MSP for Ross, Skye and Inverness West, questioned whether the commission's functions should be split.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2008 9:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Land reform
 
1

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 11:48:22
Mark Shucksmith - English - in a Scottish Job.

lookout the institutional improvers are out again.
2

Upbeat,

13/05/2008 14:56:12
Thank goodness someone has had the courage to point out that the Crofters Commission is no longer fit for purpose or relevant to day to day crofters . . An organisation that is charged with the task to oversee crofts and crofting tenure, but " is not a Map based organisation ", in these days of GPS coordinates etc., is daft !

Did anyone pause to ask;

1) How many of these supposed 11,500 Crofts today are actually viable in commercial terms. ( this particularly in view of the ongoing -30% and rising - increase in fuel this past year ?

2.)Did anybody ascertain how many people actually wish to be defined as a crofter of a non viable croft ?


It's all very well having a rose-tinted idealistic view of Crofts and Crofting. How many of those busy pontificating now within the crofters commmission and other associated bodies, have any experience personally of working a croft? Does the government have any concept of the complexities they have imposed in recent years by blindly imposing bureaucratic standards and compliance on this whole section of agriculture . ?

Arguably the greatest treat to the crofting areas are the regional planning boards. All too frequently...in order to generate Council taxation ?? ...planning bodies appear to sanction any development plan however invasive. They permit freshbuilding of new houses on decrofted pasture land throughout the highlands. This makes some crofters rich, but this is hardly an income that is sustainable as the crofts that are left get ever smaller.


3

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 15:10:27
#1. Why relevance is it that he is English? Can only Scots be professors in Scotland? By your logic that means every Scottish professor who has ever lived and worked outwith Scotland should not have left!

A Scotland only for Scots, is that what you aspire to?

You, sir, are an embarrassment for the cause of Scottish Independence by your pathetic anti-English jibes.

So, in an Independent Scotland you'd want all English people to leave. That's 10% of the population. Perhaps you'd better learn to live with your English neighbours, as in an Independent Scotland I'm sure many will be staying on. In fact, perhaps you should try and win them around to your cause, instead of living in the 1300's.
4

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 17:54:38
3 Yes you should be studying, then again you'll never get it, as you have demonstrated you cannot read.

So you advocate Anti-Scottish behavior in Scotland, my, my, you are the weird one. I suppose you probably consider the track record of the english in Britain and Scotland as wholly positive?

There are none so blind as will not see.
5

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 19:49:22
#4 You really are tiresome. Why are you talking about "anti-Scottish" behaviour? The track record of Scots isn't perfect, so if you want to start quoting proverbs at me, take the plank out of your own eye first.

Do you mind if I ignore you later? I'm a bit busy right now.
6

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 21:12:21
5 Awww little flower.

You cannot side step your Anti-Scottish behavior here, this is Scotland.

What is tiresome, is the english attitude getting media attention over native opinion, of course any imperialist would agree with that and every humanist would see something wrong with that.

Why should a Russian have an institutional public opinion within Lithuania for example?

You do not have a leg to stand on, bigoted imperialist.
7

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 22:58:21
Russians? Lithuania? Anti-Scottish behaviour?Imperialism? I thought the article was about crofting. But then your postings do seem to excel in the irrelevance. I think I've learnt my lesson well enough now.

"High King" indeed. High Horse more like.
8

Kenny A,

18/07/2009 09:23:28
OK this is now laughable, get an English person and a goat and you are a crofter. Extreme but true, try to make a living out of it and you are hammered with electronic tags, bluetounge, cannot drench or dip, without a hoard of H&S in attendance. Grass cutting regulations for f3334cks sakes.

The commission did a good job overall. To many crofts are not being used but the regulations need to be looked at, how can some people have 6 crofts and not do a turn, back to the lonly goat here.

My people worked the land,I gave my own croft to my cousin in the 70s as I knew he would work it. The real people know and respect the earth, sea and life in general.

Buy a goat and take over Scotland.
9

Real Labour,

04/08/2009 21:48:30
6 - Ard Righ - Steady on. Your both right and your being a bit wrong.

I agree , he is English in a Scottish job. But he is "English" in a culturaly "Scottish" job.

Like putting an American white European in charge of Indian affairs. As Crofting and the commission, was a means too preserve a unique and culturaly unique way of life it by logic requires people of that community to give their opinion and it have more clout.

theres nothing too say he cannot bring it into the modern age though.The highlands of Scotland should be lived in.

Ard Righ. Nothing against English folk, just the artificial structure that was cobbled together and called britain.

I really wish English folk would embrace their cultural and diluted identity. The Scottish have held onto theirs I hope England embraces hers.

As for English people in Scotland and all other nationalities. I say if you want to be a part of a unique country and wish the best and want to be a part of its future and help retain it's identity.

Then hop aboard.

Then your a weinner. You have 2 indentities and homes.




10

Real Labour,

04/08/2009 21:48:46
ooooops! winner!
11

Rob Royston,

13/08/2009 11:48:33
As #8 says any buyer can come along, make a bid for a croft giving some obtuse scheme to the commission about how he intends to work the land, and bingo he becomes a crofter. The land turns to rushes from lack of use.

At the other extreme there is the local sheep owner who becomes tennent of multiple crofts. He does not grow anything, his sheep are on the croft as much as they are on the hill. The land deteriorates and the young of the area move away as there is nothing in it for them.

Whatever our view of the cruel estate factors that ran the allocation of crofts before the Crofting Act, there is no doubt that with their methods crofting made 100% use of all the land. Granted, there was no welfare state back then.

There is a need for major changes in crofting law. Any tennant not working his land should be made to pass it on to someone in need of land, with locals having first choice. This leaves an issue with any houses on the crofts, but I am sure a scheme could be set up for either de-crofting the house or providing another house for the out-going tennant.

What has been happening in some cases is that old people remain on crofts until they die with the crofts going to ruin. Their heirs are themselves too old to return and start again when they are left the tennancy and they have families in other parts of the country, so they seldom have any option but to sell. Hence the crofts with the Englishman and his goat that #8 mentions.

There has to be a better way. Maybe a retirement age when it becomes mandatory to hand the place on. Maybe crofters being brought before land tribunals if they are not working their land. Maybe an end to mulytiple tennencies. Something needs to be done soon.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.