Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 26th November 2009

Jacobite rebels may yet seal victory

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
04 December 2007
WE ARE no longer to be crushed as rebels. The government is considering rewriting the national anthem on the grounds that the historical third verse, which refers to the Jacobite rebellion of 1745, is not "inclusive".
The words, which refer to Scots as seditious, rebellious characters who should be crushed by British forces with the assistance of God Almighty was described as "not actually that inclusive" by Lord Goldsmith, the former attorney general. He is leadi
ng a citizenship review, ordered by the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown - a Scot, though not a seditious one.

The Labour peer, who is responsible for discovering ways to bind the United Kingdom together and promote Britishness through a new "statement of values", said he had encountered a number of people who argued that the lyrics, written in 1745 by an unknown author, should be polished in the interests of political correctness.

He said: "There's some problem with part of it, absolutely. Part of it is not that inclusive. Some people have suggested we might think about whether there are different words that might be put in place which would be more inclusive."

God Save The King (or Queen) was first sung in 1745 at two London theatres, the Theatres Royal at Drury Lane and Covent Garden, to rally public spirits after the Jacobite rebellion, led by Charles Edward Stuart, defeated King George II's troops at the Battle of Prestonpans.

The commander-in-chief of Britain's forces was Marshal George Wade, who was born in Ireland but had served the king in "North Britain". The controversial third chorus goes: "Lord grant that Marshal Wade/ May by thy mighty aid/ Victory bring/ May he sedition hush/ And like a torrent rush/ Rebellious Scots to crush/ God save the King."

Unfortunately, the Lord did not grant any such favour to Marshal Wade, who was sacked after he failed to counter the Jacobite's march into England and was replaced by Prince William Augustus, the Duke of Cumberland, who went on to win the decisive Battle of Culloden in 1746.

This particular verse was abandoned soon after and long before the song was accepted as the British national anthem in the 1780s and 1790s, where it has remained by tradition alone as it has never been formally adopted by a royal proclamation or an act of parliament.

Last night, Professor Ted Cowan of Glasgow University's history department, said: "I don't know of any other national anthem that celebrates the defeat of one constituent part of the nation. But I think this wretched song has been with us too long to get rid off."

But Andrew Roberts, the author of A History of the English Speaking Peoples since 1900 said: "I'm a pretty patriotic bloke and I think I've sung the national anthem more than anyone else my age - 45 - and I have never once sang the third verse. It ... has not been sung since the 18th century. We shouldn't change it, we should just ignore it as we have done for so long."

BUILDING BRIDGES

FIELD Marshal George Wade (1673-1748) may have been hailed as the man to crush "rebellious Scots" but shortly after the lyrics were written, he was sacked and his job handed to the Duke of Cumberland.

Wade, who was born in County Westmeath in Ireland, joined the British Army in 1690 and rose to high rank.

In 1724, he was sent to inspect Scotland and recommended the construction of barracks, bridges and roads in order that the nation be properly controlled.

As Commander-in-Chief of His Majesty's Forces, Castles, Forts and Barracks in North Britain, he was responsible for the design and construction of 250 miles of roads and 40 new bridges including the Tay Bridge at Aberfeldy.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 December 2007 8:03 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

04/12/2007 10:45:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Fiona Duigan-McKay No.1,

Dunedin, New Zealand 04/12/2007 14:05:57

It was not a rebellion but an uprising against English dictatorship as no country likes to be ruled by another country.
The Duke of Cumberland a.k.a. Butcher Cumberland was a cousin of Charles Edward Stewart.
I have never sung thew English National Anthem and refuse to do so as I do not recognise the House of Hanover.

3

Craig Dulnain,

North Britain 04/12/2007 19:20:34

Professor Ted Cowan of Glasgow University's history department, said: "I don't know of any other national anthem that celebrates the defeat of one constituent part of the nation."

Er, what about "Flower of Scotland"?

"And stood against him
Proud Edward's Army
And sent him homeward
To think again..."

It cuts both ways..........

4

Sally Noggin,

The present UK 04/12/2007 19:26:40

Admirable that Fiona doesn't sing the 'English' National Anthem because of loyalty to Scotland and the importance of words; rather unsettling she mis-spells Stuart.

But words are only words, not sticks and stones.

At Culloden, I always understood there were more Scots fighting on the 'British' and Hanoverian King's side than on the side of the half-Polish, Italian-born Prince.

While I wouldn't defend Butcher Cumberland, it was a battle between Scots as much as anything else.

5

Hunky Dorey,

Glasgow 16/01/2008 13:42:29
Why should any self respecting Scotsman sing this foreign anthem.Have we not got an anthem of our own?
6

Coinneach Muir ,

London 09/04/2008 14:53:38

The problem in this case is that firstly the 45 was a civil war base on religious bigotry on both sides, an unpopular union, a foreign royal house in charge, and the utter contempt that any person living below the highland fault line had for their highland Gaelic neighbors. The good burghers of Glasgow and Dun eiden hated and feared the gael, calling them in writing at the time the 'Wild Irish'The strange thing now is that full circle the lowlanders (called sassenachs or sons of saxons by highlanders)have now embraced or imported the culture of the Gael, i.e. bagpipes, breacen(Tartan)clans etc... where in 1745 they would have thought of them as uncouth, as a race of Hottentots a barbarous people of little worth.So before we get hung-up on the third verse of the national anthem of the British, not the English, remember it was the Lowland scots (who were ethnically more akin to the English as Britons from Strathclyde than their Gaelic neighbors) not the English who perpetrated the worst excesses against the Gael after Culloden. The third verse is from a British anthem not an English one,reflecting the feelings of a great many Scots of the time, i.e. that the Catholic& Episcopalian coup should not succeed, and the prominence of the Calvinist Anglicized Lowlands of Scotland with their Teutonic outlook and zeal for commerce will finally have the upper hand. Then when the armed Gaelic clansmen and his martial culture with its non-capitalist Clan structure built on blood and kinship, need not greed, when this is only a distant memory and the proscription of arms and tartan has removed from the folk memory their use, the Lowlander will claim the Tartan and the bagpipes and the Claymore and the martial heritage as their own and plaster it on shortbread tins and crisp packets.Looking back on a romantic lost cause and Edinburgh ladies will write Jacobite songs in their drawing rooms long after they ever had any meaning.
The Gaelic (or Irish) culture that was wiped

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.