<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Row over bipolar Burns claim</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com/template/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=7277&amp;ArticleID=5342057&amp;format=rss#comments</link>
<description>Comments on "Row over bipolar Burns claim"</description>
<language>en-gb</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Johnston Press PLC</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:09:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<ttl>5</ttl>
<item>
<title>Posted by livilion, livingston</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//robertburns/Row-over-bipolar-Burns-claim.5342057.jp#comment4103268</link>
<description><![CDATA[
Is there not a case here to take the 'Scotsman' before the consumer protection people for misleading advertising. 

Mightn't the 'Little Morningsider' be a better trades description ?

Why else does its editors feel compelled to stick the boot into anything a genuine Scotsman might feel some pride in?]]></description>
<guid>/robertburns/Row-over-bipolar-Burns-claim.5342057.jp#comment4103268</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posted by Boy Wonder</title>
<link>http://heritage.scotsman.com//robertburns/Row-over-bipolar-Burns-claim.5342057.jp#comment4102309</link>
<description><![CDATA[Utter Rubbish!!!]]></description>
<guid>/robertburns/Row-over-bipolar-Burns-claim.5342057.jp#comment4102309</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>