Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 21st November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Airport shake-up 'good for passengers'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
PASSENGERS could benefit after the biggest shake-up in decades was signalled for Scotland's airports.
The operator BAA should have to sell off either Edinburgh or Glasgow airport and face new controls at Aberdeen, a Competition Commission investigation has concluded.

Airlines and travel agents welcomed the prospect of increased airport competition
, which they said could lead to lower fares and improved facilities.

But several business groups and aviation unions backed BAA, which said the proposed moves risked "creating uncertainty, delay and confusion".

The commission's provisional findings also called for Spanish-controlled BAA to sell two of its three London airports. Gatwick and Stansted are expected to be put up for sale while the firm retains Heathrow.

The commission said it had found "competition problems" at BAA's Scottish and London airports, "with adverse consequences for passengers and airlines". It said separate owners for Edinburgh and Glasgow would "improve their offerings".

The commission has also proposed unspecified "behavioural remedies or some form of regulation" at Aberdeen airport to address its local monopoly.

Christopher Clarke, who led the investigation, said: "We have provisionally found that there are significant competition problems arising from BAA's common ownership of seven UK airports – Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Southampton in England, and Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen in Scotland.

"This is evident from a large number of factors, including its lack of responsiveness to the needs of its airline customers and a lack of initiative in planning capacity. This has resulted in investment that is not tailored to the requirements of airport users and lower levels and quality of service for both airlines and passengers."

The commission said BAA had a poor record in Scotland. "(It] has until recently been noticeably slow to develop new routes at Glasgow and Edinburgh, whilst, at Aberdeen, its investment plans are regarded as unambitious despite relatively high levels of profitability," it said.

Airlines welcoming the move included Ryanair, which said: "Competition works – monopolies don't."

Travel agents said fares could be cut as a result of lower airport charges and suggested airport facilities might be improved.

Colin Matthews, BAA's chief executive, told The Scotsman it could appeal against the decision, but he admitted: "We need to be realistic and face the possibility that our arguments will not be heard."

However, he said there was no "widespread clamour" in Scotland for Edinburgh or Glasgow airports to be sold off.

Liz Cameron, the chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, accused the commission of "failing to fully comprehend that Glasgow and Edinburgh serve separate markets".

But Catriona Munro, a competition expert at the Glasgow law firm Maclay Murray & Spens, said: "It seems unlikely the Competition Commission will capitulate on such a significant issue."

BACKGROUND

• COMMON ownership of Edinburgh and Glasgow airports prevents competition between them.

• The commission proposes the sale of either Glasgow or Edinburgh airport and seeks views on this.

• Common ownership of the three BAA London airports (Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted) prevents competition between them.

• The commission proposes the sale of two of BAA's London airports.

• However, it is unlikely to require the sale of Heathrow unless the sale of Gatwick or Stansted is likely to be impractical or ineffective.

• Aberdeen's comparatively isolated geographical position, combined with other factors that make it unattractive to serve a catchment of Aberdeen's size with more than one airport, restrict airport competition.

• Aberdeen's strong local monopoly position would not be solved by its sale, so views are sought on what other measures might be appropriate, such as behavioural undertakings or regulation.

• The current system of regulation of airports distorts competition between airlines.

• The system of regulation and the role of the Civil Aviation Authority should be reviewed to make regulation more effective.

• The government should review the 2003 aviation White Paper to consider its impact on airport competition.



IN NUMBERS

240m

UK airport passengers last year

150m

passengers at BAA airports

7

BAA airports

90%

BAA market share in London area

84%

BAA market share in Scotland

60%

BAA market share in UK

68m

Heathrow passengers

35m

Gatwick passengers

24m

Stansted passengers

9m

Edinburgh passengers

9m

Glasgow passengers

2m

Southampton passengers

22m

Manchester passengers

10m

Luton passengers

9m

Birmingham passengers

6m

Bristol passengers

6m

Newcastle passengers

£4.3bn

Cost of Heathrow terminal five

1987

Year BAA privatised

2015

Next new runway – at Stansted

2020

Earliest date for new Heathrow runway

£2-3bn

Expected Gatwick sale price

£1-2bn

Expected Stansted sale price

2003

Last government aviation white paper





The full article contains 747 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 August 2008 10:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

The Spook in Leith,

21/08/2008 00:55:43
Glasgow passengers

2m

Newcastle passengers

£4.3bn

Southampton passengers

22m

Manchester passengers

10m

Heathrow passengers

35m

Oh dear oh dear, i think the Scotsman have made up them figures lmao bloody buffoons



2

The Spook in Leith,

21/08/2008 01:04:53
Should read..

Heathrow ...68,066,028

Glasgow....8,795,727

Newcastle....5,400,000

Manchester...22,112,625

Southampton..1,912,979

Tick tock scotsman..

3

Edward,

21/08/2008 02:30:58
'But several business groups and aviation unions backed BAA, which said the proposed moves risked "creating uncertainty, delay and confusion".'

Isnt this from the Scotsman's toy box of excuses for a Referendum on Independence? Sounds about the same!
4

Edward,

21/08/2008 02:37:57
'Liz Cameron, the chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, accused the commission of "failing to fully comprehend that Glasgow and Edinburgh serve separate markets".
Come again?
I remember when the dead hand of the BAA stifled tran-atlantic flights from the newly acquired Edinburgh Airport, as all international flights had to go through Prestwick (which they owned at the time). Then BAA sold of Prestwick as unsurpringly airlines were fed up being told to use Prestwick and pulled out. So then BAA insisted international flights use Glasgow Abbotsinch instead. The problem with BAA is it try's to manipulate the market by dictating to airlines which airports they should be using, instead of just allowing the airlines a free choice to choose which airport they want to fly from based on passenger demands
5

Edward,

21/08/2008 02:40:10
Personally I would like to have ALL the airports in Scotland owned by BAA sold off!Then we might see better services from Scotland, by airports working for Scotland and not acting us feeders to London
6

Dougie Douglas,

Brisbane 21/08/2008 04:22:47
Just how will selling Glasgow Airport to the owners of Manchester help create more routes out of Glasgow?. It's counter-productive for Manchester to develop Glasgow as an internal competitor.

Without building a new central Scottish Airport to service both Edinburgh and Glasgow equally it seems the best hope is for Edinburgh to be developed and for them to target customers from Glasgow AND Newcastle.
7

Unruly pupil,

21/08/2008 07:55:15
1 & 2 or you could have read the article a bit more carefully and got things in the right order.(numbers then airport)

9m
Glasgow passengers

6m
Newcastle passengers

2m
Southampton passengers

22m
Manchester passengers

68m
Heathrow passengers


Sheesh. tick tock indeed.
8

eric,

Lothian 21/08/2008 08:07:32
Manchester has its eye on Glasgows Long haul status.Remember lots of folks from Edinburgh and Glasgow still use manchester.manchester has its own jobcentre at airport ,As well as train link like Glasgow is building.
9

FC Barcelona,

21/08/2008 08:48:14
#8 is eric reynolds
10

gus1940,

Edinburgh 21/08/2008 09:04:07
Glasgow Airport should be closed and its flights moved to an upgraded Prestwick using the money that is going to be spent in creating the rail link to Abbotsinch.

When Renfrew closed there was a big debate as to whether to use Prestwick or to develop Abbotsinch.

The Abbotsinch option was only chosen as a sop to weegie poiticians as it was obvious to anybody with any sense that Prestwick and Edinburgh could best handle requirements.

The case for Prestwick is even stronger now since the fast electric train service was introduced.
11

Alasdair,

21/08/2008 09:24:41
Redeveloping Glasgow Prestwick would cost a small fortune though. The buildings that are out of use there are sealed, as they are riddled with asbestos. As for the trainlink, it's handy, but I wouldn't exactly call it high-speed.
On the occasions I've used the Glasgow Airport, one of the handy things has been that you can come right off the M8 and be there.

Isn't Glasgow Prestwick largely used for freight anyway?
12

Skiver,

21/08/2008 10:13:26
#1 & 2

The Spook - you are, to use one of your own terms, a bloody buffoon.
13

Joe,

Livingston 21/08/2008 10:31:27
"However, he said there was no "widespread clamour" in Scotland for Edinburgh or Glasgow airports to be sold off."

Out of touch..he should read the Scottish newspaper forums and visit the various departure lounges..
14

Joe,

Livingston 21/08/2008 10:37:40
#7..The numbers are actually Edinburgh 9.1M and Glasgow
8.5M..source BAA's latest July figures
15

Joe,

Union Street 21/08/2008 10:41:10
Why is it when Glasgow was Scotland's busiest Airport
there were no cries to build a central Scotland airport? Now Edinburgh has the busiest status there are cries to build a new airport anywhere but in Edinburgh?
16

Skiver,

21/08/2008 10:51:50
Joe - are you in love with Edinburgh Airport? Maybe you should get married to it.
17

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 21/08/2008 10:59:16
Passengers could benefit eh? I'll believe it when I see it.

For a start, the flights need to run on time, with detailed explanations given to passengers and large fines to airlines if they do not.

Secondly, they need to bin all these ridiculous "security" measure, which are really only just for show.

Thirdly, they need to provide smoking areas in air-side lounges. It is absolutely criminal to ban people from smoking there when they have no choice but to be there.
18

,

21/08/2008 11:11:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Alasdair,

21/08/2008 13:30:16
No reply from Joe.. he's run away again!!

He can run very fast - after all, he got from Livingston to Union Street in the 4 minutes between posts #14 and #15!!
20

Scottish 'N British,

21/08/2008 13:34:34
"Shake-up good for passengers"

Would love this to be true. We passengers need a better deal from airlines.
21

IanW,

Grasbrunn 21/08/2008 14:35:46
Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head #17 - You state "It is absolutely criminal to ban people from smoking there when they have no choice but to be there." Who says they have no choice? Passengers choose to use a service, they are not forced to do so. If they want to fly somewhere on holiday they can go to another airport, etc., or travel by car.

Further can't they do without their dose of lung cancer drug for a few hours!
22

Joe,

Livingston 21/08/2008 15:55:32
#18..Your comments are both insulting and offensive..intelligent folk don't run away. they shake their heads in disbelief at the infantile reciprocations.
23

The Spook in Leith,

21/08/2008 16:34:53
#7 Unruly pupil

Excuse me but the Scotsman has changed the figures around, them figures were not like that last night and even still, they are wrong..indeed tick tock..

#12 Skiver,21/08/2008 10:13:26
#1 & 2

The Spook - you are, to use one of your own terms, a bloody buffoon.

Okay so you are a unionist posting under an other moniker, big deal..

So what makes me a buffoon, like i said to the other poster, those figures were not laid out like that last night...tick tock buffoon
24

Alasdair,

22/08/2008 10:04:30
Oh look - Joe had post #18 removed!

Did it contain rude words? No.

Did it list examples of his dishonesty? Yes.

Joe - in post 14 you give figures for GLA and EDI airports which are false - BAA figures show that GLA handled 939,204 passengers last month - almost 35,000 more than Edinburgh.
Why do you lie, Joe?

Why are you so insecure?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.