Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 21st November 2009

Scots team hunts for other 'death railway'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 November 2009
THEIR ordeal has always been overshadowed by a more famous episode of military history but the blood, sweat, tears – and deaths – were the same.
A team of archaeologists from Scotland is working to chart the remains of a Second World War jungle railway built by Allied prisoners of war as a tribute to the men who died.

The famous Burma railway claimed the lives of 16,000 Allied prisoners, a
nd its story was later told in the Hollywood movie The Bridge On The River Kwai.

The film was based on the horrors of Japan's attempts to control the Far East theatre of war by working 16,000 Allied prisoners to death building the line.

But hundreds of captured Allied servicemen – including captured members of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders – were also put to work on a 140-mile section of a line across central Sumatra, The island, now part of Indonesia, was seized by the Japanese army, which needed a railway to transport troops quickly through impenetrable jungle.

The stretch of railway between the river port of Pekanbaru and the town of Muara was completed on the day the war ended, with its construction in inhospitable terrain leading directly to the deaths of 700 Allied troops and thousands of local slave labourers. It was never used and large sections have been reclaimed by the jungle over the years.

Last month the Scottish team successfully traced most of the route of what has became known as the Sumatra "Death Railway" and are now preparing for a major series of digs to uncover forgotten war graves from an almost forgotten episode of the war.

Team leader Chris O'Connell, of Midlothian-based CRA Archeology, said: "This railway, if it was anywhere in Europe, would be a scheduled monument or even a war grave.

"As it is, it is almost forgotten and I think we owe it to the people who died building it to try to record its story for posterity.

"Indonesia is a poor country and doesn't have money for the upkeep of such a monument. That's why we think it is urgent that we fully document the physical aspects of the railway and its history."

O'Connell, whose Scottish team linked up with local and New Zealand researchers on the project, surveyed the route last month, despite being badly shaken – and nearly stranded – by the earthquake that killed thousands in the region.

The only clues they had for the route of the railway were a rough sketch made by a former Dutch prisoner and the odd rail dug up by locals to be used for fence posts. But local residents helped them to identify many of the original embankments, which are still used as tracks through paddy fields, rubber plantations and swamps.

Survivors have described how they were overworked, underfed, provided with little medicine, and subjected to constant physical and mental abuse by Japanese overseers.

The conditions for the PoWs and the local labourers, who were called Romushas, would have been gruesome, O'Connell said. "We were eaten alive by mosquitoes, we had to burn off leeches from our bodies and the heat was unbearable. But we got to get a cold beer at the end of the day. "

The Japanese plan was to create a 138-mile connection between the town of Pekanbaru, in the centre of Sumatra but connected by river to the Straits of Malacca, and an existing rail line, which ran to the city of Padang on the Indian Ocean.

The surrounding terrain was swamp, with numerous interlaced waterways, creeks and bayous and a terrible area on which to build railbeds, bridges and tracks. South of the town was dense towering jungle, complete with wild tigers and elephants. Compounding the prisoners' problems were the extreme equatorial heat and the rains of the spring monsoon.

From May to September 1944, the Japanese threw into this inhospitable area around 5,000 Allied prisoners who they had captured on Java two-and-a-half years earlier. Almost 4,000 had been in the Royal Dutch East Indies Army and close to 1,000 were British Army, Navy and Air Force personnel. Additionally, 200 Australians and 15 Americans, mostly merchant seamen whose ships had been sunk by a German raider, made up the total.

Prisoners of war died by the dozen of malnutrition, malaria and even infected rat bites. Conditions were among the worst encountered by British prisoners during the war and as bad as those faced by captured soldiers who built the Burma Railway.

Two Japanese officers were sentenced for war crimes offences for their part in building the Sumatra railway, the final spike of which was driven into the tracks on 15 August, 1945, the day Japan surrendered. It took guards weeks to tell their prisoners that the war was over.

The line, however, was never really used. O'Connell and his colleagues are now working on the theory that Japanese officers were simply paying lip service to orders to complete it, but at great cost to those who built it.

The team will return next year to try to uncover some of the graves of the servicemen and other slave labourers who died during its construction so the sites can be properly marked and maintained.

Remarkably, the Scots archaeologists came across a 93-year-old survivor of the atrocities, still living just 50 yards from the railway line.

"Damin had been taken from the neighbouring island of Java," O'Connell said. "He did not even know where to, and was made to work on the railway. He has still never been back to Java or seen his Javanese family. I was certainly tearful when I heard what he had to say. His story made our work far more real."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 7:33 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Navvy,

08/11/2009 09:01:52
The film was based on the horrors of Japan's attempts to control the Far East theatre of war by working 16,000 Allied prisoners to death building the line.

What a silly statement. The railway construction was not to work prisoners to death, how would that help them control the Far East theatre? The Burma Railway ws built to link Thailand and its neighbours with Burma and India by rail which would release shipping and make it less risky and easier to supply the Japanese armies attacking India. The Malacca Strait and especially the seas west of Burma were subject to attack by Allied, mostly British ships and aircraft based in India and Ceylon, The Sumatra railway was for a similar purpose. the indian ocean was a risky place for the Japanese.

That said it is an interesting story, my uncle walked across Sumatra and on to Australia after escaping from Malaya, he was helped by his knowledge of the language.

And yes, had the Japanese wanted to kill theprisoners it would have been much easier for them to do so in Singapore just as they killed thousands of civilians in Singapore. They prisoners were however considered expendable. They were not considered to be real men because Japanese culture prevented Japanese soldiers from surrendering which is why some did not obey the Emperor's order to surrender in 1945
2

Mrs Alex Pinkfoot,

08/11/2009 12:38:50
"Indonesia is a poor country and doesn't have money for the upkeep of such a monument"

The Japaneese government should be footing the bill for this.
3

Thrawn,

UK 08/11/2009 14:48:15
Shocking as the loss of Allied P.O.W.s was - they were worked to death, as the report indicates, and lived in appalling conditions - we should not forget that even more thousands of native peoples were equally enslaved and worked to death by the Japanese.

More needs to be written about what became called "The Forgotten War", which became even more forgotten about after VE Day (Victory in Europe) in 1945 and lasted for several more months, until WW2 finally ended with VJ Day.

Most people know that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and then on Nagasaki ended the War, but how aware are they of the fire-bombing of other major Japanese cities in which even more people perished? By contrast, Dresden and Hamburg are names which evoke memories of fire storms and devastation perpetuated against the enemy.
4

Budgie,

INCHINNAN 08/11/2009 17:32:27
Navvy.
Just a thought. Would David Leask's report be any less silly if he had said "Sixteen thousand men died during the construction of the line"? The fact is that 16,000 Allied prisoners did perish and this was not as a result of good treatment from their captors.
5

Brianwci,

08/11/2009 17:44:32
#3 Thrawn UK. None of the major powers can hold their heads high coming out of 20th century wars. Certainly not the British whose Empire had been built on exploitation and whose actions re Dresden and Hamburg are blots on our history as are our backing of the H Bomb being used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, especially the latter.

Footnote: The original Bridge Over the River Kwai is gone but its replacement a short distance up river has been built using some materials from the original bridge e.g. railway sleepers.

Tourists can step on the original sleepers as they cross the bridge.

If parts of the Indonesian Line could be made available to tourists it would be a major coup for Indonesia's Tourist Industry.
6

Thrawn,

UK 08/11/2009 19:20:37
Brianwci: You raise some significant moral points.

When Britain could not fight back against Germany in any other way, i.e. before the D-Day landings, the bombing of Germany was an effective second front. Von Speer admitted as much. The later whole-scale bombing of Germany, i.e. bomb everything because we have not yet developed precision-bombing techniques, enabled the Nazis to declare the British (and Americans) "Terrorflieger" (terror airmen).

If you have read W G Sebald's essay "Luftkrieg und Literatur" (Aerial Bombing and Literature), you will note how the author points out that not only prominent British figures like Lord Salisbury and the Bishop of Chichester condemned this tactic in the House of Lords but members of the public also did so. The point of Sebald's essay is to reveal how German authors were silent about this period of the war. Perhaps they were ashamed of the horror that Germany was responsible for and almost saw the destruction of Germany as a punishment.

Whereas the American author of "Catch 22" (Vonnegut?) is aware of the devastation caused by the American bombing of Germany, I am unaware of any sense of American war guilt for the fire bombing of Japanese cities. This was just as bad as the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Soviet Union probably regarded its actions against the Germans and her allies as retribution. But can such behaviour be justified? It is little known that the Russians only fought against the Japanese for a matter of weeks, just before the bombing of Hiroshima. Nonetheless, as spoils, they took half of Sakhalin Island and the Kurile Islands from the Japanese and sent captured Japanese troops to gulags. There was no moral justification for this action. The Soviet deeds in Poland in particular and in the Baltic States are equally reprehensible.

I think that what you are arguing is that the conduct of the Allies in WW2 meant that they could not fully claim to have behaved morally. I cannot dispute that. H
7

Thrawn,

UK 08/11/2009 19:21:27
Brianci (cont.):

I think that what you are arguing is that the conduct of the Allies in WW2 meant that they could not fully claim to have behaved morally. I cannot dispute that, but an East German friend of mine, whose father was snatched by the Russians on his return to Germany in 1945 and perished in a gulag, praised Britain and said that we could be proud of our fight against fascism.

Navvy is right. The Burma Railway (one man died for every sleeper laid) was intended to deliver Japanese supplies to the Front, and I have been to Khanchanaburi and visited the "European Prisoner of War" cemetery, the JEAL prisoner of war camp and the Bridge over the River Kwai itself. I am interested to know what accommodation the Thais struck with the Japanese. Did they allow them freedom of movement within their country provided they did not "conquer" Thailand. It all seems very ambivalent to me.

For those who are interested, the battles against the Japanese on the Indian border make for stirring reading. Another close-run thing.

Britain was very dependent on all those members of the Empire, black and white, who came to her support in her hour of need. Should you visit London, go to Hyde Park Corner and visit the New Zealand and Australian war memorials, walk through the Memorial Gates commemorating those from black colonial countries by Constitution Hill and walk over to the Canadian war memorial in Green Park. And remember: these people were all British.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.