Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 26th November 2009

Furious Sir Sean cancels Festival audience

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2006
SIR Sean Connery last night pulled out of a high-profile festival appearance at the Scottish Parliament, furious that he was going to be asked questions about his views on violence against women.
The former James Bond star had agreed to take part in a public discussion with George Reid, the Presiding Officer, in front of an audience.

But in an interview with Holyrood magazine earlier this month, Mr Reid promised to ask the 75-year-old actor tough questions about his views on violence against women.

"He [Sir Sean] will be asked difficult questions - about did a slap never do a woman any harm, for example," Mr Reid said.

This was a reference to the controversy that has dogged Sir Sean for years, after comments he reportedly made to a US magazine in 1993 which he stated: "To slap a woman is not the cruellest thing you can do to her."

When Sir Sean read Mr Reid's comments and scores of headlines which yet again drew attention to his views on violence against women, he was so angry he withdrew immediately from the Festival of Politics.

It is understood that he telephoned Mr Reid last Tuesday to complain about his comments and, although Mr Reid apologised, Sir Sean refused to reconsider his decision.

The actor's withdrawal represents a major embarrassment for Mr Reid, who has been the inspiration and the driving force behind the Festival of Politics, which took place for the first time last year.

This year will be Mr Reid's last such festival before he steps down as Presiding Officer at next May's elections and he was delighted when he felt he would be able to finish with a high-profile interview with someone of Sir Sean's fame and popularity. The "in conversation" event was destined to be a sell-out, the highlight of the Festival of Politics and one of the major events of the festival season.

The Festival of Politics will be launched on Monday, but without the fanfare that would have accompanied Sir Sean's participation.

A parliament spokesman admitted yesterday that Mr Reid had tried to convince Sir Sean to change his mind, but without success.

He said: "Earlier this week, the Presiding Officer offered his apology to Sir Sean for the hurt and annoyance caused by the resulting media coverage. The Presiding Officer stated, however, that the principles of the Festival of Politics meant he had to conduct an uncompromising interview in a BBC style."

The festival will still run for four days - a day longer than last year's, which attracted almost 3,000 visitors.

Around 50 events are planned for the festival, which runs from 23 to 26 August. The parliament spokesman added: "Last year's festival was very successful and we hope this year's will be every bit as well received."

However, Sir Sean's absence will be even more keenly felt by the organisers because, during the time when the Festival of Politics takes place, the film star will be in Edinburgh for ten days as patron of the Film Festival.

Sir Sean attended the opening of the Scottish Parliament in 1999 and was at the opening five years later of the £431 million Holyrood building.

The actor's first wife, Diane Cilento, 72, who now lives in Australia, was married to Sir Sean for more than a decade.

In her recent book, My Nine Lives, she made controversial claims that she was struck on the face and knocked to the floor by Connery one night.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2006 11:00 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sean Connery
 
1

Terence Sutherland,

Woodlawn, NY 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Sir Sean Connery wisely withdrew because he could sense some political "Hang-Em-High" attitude in this interview. And he could have possibly thought about repercussions that might arise in his last acting movie of his great career coming up soon.

I fully agree with Michelle/Greece; he's a tough-guy from a bygone era. Let him live out his life in the Bahamas...Concluding, he's done more for Scotland than any male Scot dead or alive...

2

sheena,

Clackmannanshire 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I cannot let Jim's comment pass without pointing out for the record that way back in the 70's when George Reid was the MP for Clackmannan & E. Stirling, he promoted, in close collaboration with Women's Aid, a Domestic Violence (Scotland) Act. When he lost his seat no other Scottish MP would take it up and we had to wait many years before we got what was basically Mr Reid's bill onto the statute books. He worked so hard on this issue that I believe he remains the only man every to be asked to open a Women's Aid refuge.

As to 'what Sean shaid', as an ex Women's Aid worker I could give thousands of examples of things much much worse than a slap in the face which have been perpetrated by men against women. But a slap in the face is still wrong.

3

penelope,

Cedar Falls, IA, USA 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Way to go, Danny L., you tell 'em!
By the way, I caught your ironies. Re marriage being considered the "subjugated slavery" of a woman...the flip view would be it's an illusion of economic security for her in exchange for that "slavery," and possessing that illusion is not such a bad thing. Of course, possessing real economic security would be even better. :-)

Re Sir Sean Connery's observation made 16 years ago, what IS all the fuss about? He said it, it was a correct observation to make during any historical period regarding what can happen to a woman at the hand of a man, and what he said is in no way implicative of whether he condones or condemns any such violence against women. Had any of us been there when he said it to hear the inflections in his voice as to how he said it, then possibly it might warrant a fuss, but since we weren't why bother with it now? Good on him for withdrawing his participation in the Festival of Politics.

That said, I feel sorry for Mr. Reid for making a reported boast about an up-coming widely publicized event that he has had to now publicly retract in the course of wiping the egg from his face that the initial reported boast caused to be tossed in his direction.

4

mr chips,

glasgow 24/06/2006 00:00:00

john miller from fife is correct in what he says about reid and the rest of the overpaid numpty,s at hollyrood.big sean was right to cancel, and what the
hell is a festival of politics,another platform so as the heid numpty,s can dish out a load of self appraisal at our expence.

5

DannyL,

North Wales 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Whether or not he is a misguided loudmouthed misogynist politically naive voilent bigot, or indeed any part or parts of that epithet, he is under no obligation to clarify waters muddied on his behalf by others without solitication.
Why is it Sport du Jour to project our collective neuroses onto someone is alleged to have dropped a clanger in public? I believe the last (British) Tory Government called it 'the politics of envy'.

6

island writer,

somewhere in the western isles 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Give us a break! Slapping anyone - man woman or child is wrong. What's this guy's problem? Can't he simply clarify the situation and be done with it? Frankly I couldn't care less what some rather second rate actor who peddles his 'Scottishness' round the playgrounds of the world thinks about anything. Let him stay deepening his tan beside one of his swimming pools in nice sunny places and leave us to our reality.

7

Margaret,

Long Beach, New York 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Every day is seems in the U.S. you pick up a paper and read that some husband or boyfriend had beaten and killed or injured a wife or girlfriend.
I grew up in Glasgow, and back in the day it was okay it seems for a man to beat a woman. Today it should not be tolerated in any form, and men like Sean Connery, who is from that old era when men slapped their women around, should keep his mouth shut and not make comments as inflammatory as slapping a woman is okay. How would he like it if his wife slapped his face on a daily basis or beat him senseless. Mr. Connery, because of his famous name and because so many people listen to him, should be speaking out against violence on women. It is not okay to hit any woman, period.

8

Southern Belle,

Gainesville 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Sir Sean was absolutely right to pull out of the festival. Mr. Reid was only attempting to shine the light brightly on himself with his ludicrous comments. Sir Sean has done much good for Scotland's image and did not deserve to have old comments dredged up. We would all be embarrassed if comments we made long ago were scrutinized. Mr. Reid is definitely an egotistical idiot for driving Sir Sean off from the festival.

9

Jim,

1000 Islands CA 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Fools rush in where angel's fear to tread!-So 'tis said!
And rightly should Sir Sean withdraw from a discussion that can be likened to quicksand - that simply ensnares the hapless as they strugglel to regain high ground.
Not that the topic should be avoided - but why did the interviewer not do something about violence against women from his position.
"Tis cowardly and dullardly methinks to cast stones from a houselful of windows.
Sir Sean will live on as a beacon of Scottish nationalism.
Can the same be said for the interviewer (whatever his name is?)

10

Thomas from Tennessee,

TN, USA 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I see absolutely no reason for Sir Sean to allow himself to be subjected to cross examination about a remark made a long time ago. There are most certainly a lot worse things than a face slap done to women.

I notice in the first response on here that John speaks of lack of command of the language, and adequate vocabulary, by 'making up words'. May I point out that his use of THERE where THEIR would have been the correct word - does not speak too well of his knowledge of right/wrong words in the language either.

The very next comment contains a much abused word:- “Prerogative” is frequently both mispronounced and misspelled as “perogative.” It may help to remember that the word is associated with PRivileges of PRecedence.
Those who critique others should perhaps pay more attention to their own shortcomings. Typos are one thing - these are word abuse.

11

Mabusha,

24/06/2006 00:00:00

In the past Sir Sean has said similar things - it is only now that such attitudes are, at least publicly, frowned upon. Because he's a public figure it's easy to point fingers at him for being a misogynist of some sort - and he may be, but if Reid really wants bring up the point of violence against women aren't more effective and realistic ways of bringing it up? That it takes a public figure's notoriety to render such a topic important enough to discuss says more about Scotland, or at least Mr. Reid's Scotland than it does about Sir Sean.

12

DannyL,

North Wales 24/06/2006 00:00:00

To summarise this discussion:
Mr. McConnell has a glo'al stop and cannae unnerstaun' the queen's (god bless her) english too weel. Especially, it seems, in the areas of double negatives and Shakespearian irony. Some of the correspondents appear to know that a prepostion is something you should never end a sentence with. Sir Sean is a luvvie and appears a bit prickly about engaging in conversation with allegedly hick politicians, in case they misconstrue or misrepresent (knowlingly or othwerwise) a remark he made some time ago, one interpretation of which is rather unfortunate. Sir Sean is either a tax exile or an economic migrant who did rather better than many.
Two questions: (1) how much of this is news opposed to gossip? (2) has anyone here been good enough to offer an opinion on Sir Sean's original remark?
OK then, I will. There are worse things that hitting a woman. Some examples: Keeping her in subjugated slavery as if a chattel for up to 60 years and calling it a holy union. Refusing to respect her opinions or her right to express them. Discrimination against her because of her gender, appearance, or sexual preferences. None of these is right, but with all due respect to Ms Cliento sometimes the effect of some can last longer than the effect of others. Does saying any of this infer that I have actually hit any woman at any time?
I happen to think that Sir Sean can be a bit dumb sometimes, maybe even most of the time - but there is no discussion to have on this topic. There is at least some prima facie evidence to suppoet the contention that what he said is correct. And if he wants to decline the option to take some appearance money from people he thinks are going to give him a hard time through their own lack of perception or their need for self-gratification or self-promotion, he has every right to do so. It's quite simply a case of pearls before swine.
It comforting to know, however, that at no time has Sir Sean asked whether

13

JPR,

Glasgow 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I agree that Mr Salmon /MS Sturgeon should condem Sir Sean actions by pulling out of the Festival of Politics because he is frit about being asked difficult and embarassing questions re Domestic Violence. So much for Sean Connery's comittment to Scotland.

14

MarkW,

Morningside, Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Sean, please ignore the backward-looking and petty-minded twittering of our press and polititians. We need you here!

15

Laura,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

......... higher entities than Scottish politicians will be the judge of an individual's actions. Sir Sean's commitment to Scotland is legendary and not in question. Get over it ........

16

JPR,

Banff 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I agree What is our MP Alex Salmond think about the Principle Donor to the SNP Pulling out of the Festival of politics because he cannot handle difficult questions.

17

larsonsmum,

Aberdeenshire 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I actually think far too much time is spent pandering to Sir Sean. He's taken strops before on various issues. Don't indulge him anymore.

18

Sarah,

Reading, UK (originally from Glenrothes, Fife) 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Sir Sean is wonderful patron of Scotland who should not be lowered to the small mindedness of particular Scottish politicians. Stop flogging a dead horse Mr Reid and attempt to engage in a debate about something worthwhile.

19

Idealistic but realistic,

China 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I'm sure if Mr Reid had asked for opinions on Scottish nationhood or what they thought of current state of Scottish politics Sir Sean would have been at the front of the queue! But to "challenge" him to discuss his views on something which is thankfully illegal and only condoned by a tiny stupid minority? This would not a much of a debate only an opportunity to agree with majority or commit PR suicide.

20

CS Lewis fan,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

For anonymous's post of girl-gang violence. This is not the issue, that's a teenage peer group situation. The statistics on the number of females harmed by males are extremely high compared to the small number of females who ever harm a male. Also note that, IF and WHEN, a female actually does harm a male, then she can expect her prison sentence to be lot harsher. Misogyny is very much alive and kicking.

21

JPR,

Lothian 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Domestic Violence against women is a a very serious issue and should not be viewd as flogging a dead horse and Sean Connery should be held to account for his views .

22

Simon,

24/06/2006 00:00:00

I've always had a problem with Seans political affiliations. If he supports the SNP fine, but he doesn't live or pay taxes here ?? . As an ambassador for tourism, our largest industry he's fine, but definitely not politically again because he lives abroad. Its often said of him that he'll do anything for Scotland but not live here, why?. He's interfering in what does not concern him. If it ever went wrong he'd be safe and sound in his tax exile.
I also think there is a chance that he would be mauled alive in any political debate, If he cant handle questions on touchy and awkward subjects what chance has he got in full political debate, perhaps embarrasment for the SNP.

23

Thomas from Tennessee,

TN 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Nicely put Jim, extra l's noted. Ha! Ha!

24

Transparent?,

Kirkcaldy 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Anonymous from Perth: It seems everything I say is misconstrued, even by people from Perth who haven't the courage to put their name to their comments.

25

JPR,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I think Mr Reid was right to challenge SirSean Connery's Past re Domestic Violence in the the interview in the Festival of Politics . Sean Connery is seen as icon and role model and such should set an example to other men. By pulling out Sir Sean has obviously got something to be frightened of.
I hope the Leader of the SNP condems his actions.

26

Transparent?,

Kirkcaldy 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I suspect Mr Connery is running away from a guilty conscience. After all, he had an excellent chance to clarify any previous comments he may have made about the subject during the interview with Mr Reid.

The show must go on, Mr Connery, so don't run away from your commitment. Show some '007' courage and let's hear what you have to say about it.

27

Laura,

Perth 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Jim in Kirkcaldy: what you suspect is irrelevant but keeps the pot boiling. I bet you have never said anything which was misconstrued. Well done to Sir Sean for not rising to it!

28

Laura,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

........ see how a comment "to slap a woman is not the cruellest you can do to her" quickly becomes Sean Connery thinks beating women is ok. In any event this was hardly the forum to discuss such a topic and I would imagine Mr Reid would readily admit it wasn't a "challenge" he was issuing, merely a misguided effort to set the record straight (probably at the behest of a "wimmin's group"). All violence is abhorent and most right thinking men and women will condem it.

29

Chris seeing red,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Has anyone ever heard the phrase... "Beating a Dead Horse"? How would all of you who think Sir Sean should make his appearance anyway like something you said, whether taken in context ot not brought up time and time again. It's sensationalism that's all. I applaud Sir Sean for standing up and taking his stand against it. He wasn't invited here to take yet another media beating over something he may or may not have said a long, long time ago. As for Mr Reid... even suggesting bringing up such an idiotic subject with Mr Connery is a slap in the face to him. Stick to the real politics at hand please.

30

Neil,

Glasgow 24/06/2006 00:00:00

This was something that PR men said for him back in the 1960s, to bost his James Bond image before Bond, or anybody else, had heard of political correctness. Should politicians be reminded of similar old stuff? Mr Blair first entered Parliament on a promise to quit the EU instantly without a referendum & the SNP predictied disaster if we weren't free by some year ending in 3.

Quite incomprehensibly, to the PC crowd, these remarks about slapping women do not seem to have turned off his female audience.

On the other hand if Connery wanted a soft interview from Reid, who after all is an ex-TV pundit, he should have said so in the first place. I hope he will rethink.

31

J.M.,

Kettlebridge, Fife 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Mr Reid like most Members of the Scottish Parliament is an embarrassment to this country. The Parliament, composed of second and third grade politicians, many of whom are there because they were insignificant council officials who could shout a bit louder than there erstwhile colleagues, they are cruelly and clinically exposed by the ridiculously low quality of their debating skills in the chamber of the Scottish Parliament. Mr Reid has at least a good command of the English language unlike Mr McConnell, who seems blissfully unaware of the existance of the letter "t" in the word Scotland and makes up non-existent words to compensate for his lack of an adequate vocabulary. Waving his arms about like some demented conductor, he is pathetic caricature of a political leader.

John Miller

32

Aged SNP Voter,

Scotland 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Yet again, it is difficult to draw the line about violence either to men or women. My daughter just celebrated her 3rd birthday and at the party, one little boy was a little 'boisterous' and temporarily distressed my daughter - no major problem but I grew up in an area/era of Scotland where 'girl gangs' were more feared than the male equivalent. They 'sharpened' the ends of their metal combs to be used for stabbing but kept as a comb to disguise the true nature of the weapon. Other 'hidden weapons' were 'razor blades' sewed to inside of lapels which would cause slashes to the fingers if the lapels were grabbed in a scuffle. Violence is by no means the perogative of the male of the species and what does cutting off of a male penis and having sex knowingly with HIV say about gender?

33

Johnni,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

My father was a violent man who used to regularly beat my mother, myself and my siblings. Where and when I grew up, it was considered part of our way of life. Every one of my freinds had similar tales about their fathers ... and Scottish society condoned it during that period. Of course it's all changed for the better ... but Big Tam was also a product of that age. I fully expect his views to be less than stellar when it concerns women and violence. Of course his politics are Nationalistic. But, just because he has political views doesn't mean he his other views carry any import. FAME does not necessarily mean WISE as well!!

34

thesmallerhalf,

West Calder 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I am at a loss as to why Mr Reid was so keen to discuss such matters. It is not overtly political and seems more akin to the tittle tattle beloved by hack journalists looking for a headline to boost sales. He got the headlines but at what cost? As for the comment attributed to Mr Connery, what is the problem? It is true in itself and does not imply guilt or approval of hitting women. And since when did Mr Connery put himself up as a paragon of virtue? I am reminded of a recent story regarding the tendency of some young women to assault their boyfriends. Maybe Mr Reid should address this issue.

35

Laura,

Perth 24/06/2006 00:00:00

If the quote attributed to Sir Sean is an accurate, verbatim account of his words: i.e. "To slap a woman is not the cruellest thing you can do to her," then there is nothing in this to suggest that he is condoning violence. There ARE worse things. End of story. Lets move on please ........ Sir Sean is a great guy and a great ambassador for Scotland:to be treasured not tried again and again on this old chestnut.

Engage brain before opening mouth Mr Reid. An opportunity lost to highlight Scotland on the world map with one of the most world famous personalities we are glad is one of us.

I am proud to be Scottish but find myself constantly cringing at the crass utterings of a few of the elected politicians who more often than not come across as bunch of "wee nyaffs" - how embarrassing!

36

Dave Stewart,

Aberdeen 24/06/2006 00:00:00

I completely agree with 'anonymous' of Perth. Connery does not condone violence with this statement , and there ARE worse things.

This was probably the usual yellow journalist trick of taking things totally out of context.

37

Laura,

Perth 24/06/2006 00:00:00

ooooooooohhhhhhhhh!!!!! touchy!!!!!!!

38

Laura,

Edinburgh 24/06/2006 00:00:00

.......... well said Mark W ...........

39

Davy,

24/06/2006 00:00:00

John Miller you are correct in what you have written
I agree with every word, nice 1.

40

JoeMcElhone,

Virginia USA 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Thanks for a chance to comment . Sean Connery (OopsSir Sean ) is an embarresment to me as an expatriot.First of all, for him, the great Scottish Nationalist, to beg an English honor is bloodey awful.His work was great. Who needs for the Queen to verify it? And be assured , he did beg.He's like a wee boy from the slums,wanting to look big. He is big. What's with the title? Second. he is a misoginist.(Spelling?) That's why he had trouble when begging his title.Now he don't have the balls to state his opinion on women when it might call for public explanation.I reqally hope you can get this opinion to his handlers. "He was a great guy gone wrong. Joe McElhone

41

Pointmade,

24/06/2006 00:00:00

I can live anywhere and don't let greed decide where I live. I have not got the cash of Big Tam and am happy none the less. I have made mistakes in the way I have treated others, and feel the better for being able to admit my human frailty and to have learned from it. He is no different from the rest, and shying away from himself or any comments made show weakness rather than strength. Also it takes a big man to make an appology and an even bigger one to accept it. Not accepting appologies is a form of spite. has big Tam forgot to laugh at himself and go light on himself. We all do and say daft and bad things, but we can appologize and also accept the appology. it's human to err, and lets face it, who wants to go to the grave harbouring a grudge. It's the stuff feuds are made of. Thank goodness an appology was forthcoming. Come on Tam, you're getting on, acting like a big sulky wean. Accept the appology and have a good belly laugh at yersel' and die with a happy heart. Love and peace.

42

DannyL,

North Wales 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Funnily enough and following on from Jim's post, there is I believe a stock-phrase in the legal profession that refers to the trick-question as the 'When did you stop beating your wife?' Sir Sean has, it seems, taken the wise decision to follow Lord Callaghan's advice - when you find yourself in a deep hole, you should stop digging.

43

Michelle,

Greece 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Sean Connery is a tough guy actor of a certain era..up to his eyeballs in tartan and burr and about as good an ambassador for Scotland as the Bay City Rollers were in their day...I dont think we, or headline thirsty politicians, should pay much attention to what pops out of his mouth. And I don't think his tiny, feisty wife looks like she'd put up with any slapping! As my granny used to say,"You may be bigger than me, and you may be stronger than me...but you'll have to lie down and shut your eyes sometime!"

44

GalacticCannibal,

Southern California 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Diane Cilento , Sean Connery's first wife wrote that he hit her in the face and knocked her to the ground. If that is true, then it means Sean Connery was a wife beater. Men who beat women are cowardly scum in my opinion.
Liam O'Brien

45

george toot toot,

France (ex-Pat) 24/06/2006 00:00:00

Isn't it about time to find some intelligent politicians who don't have to talk utter rubbish about invited VIPs to try to hide their owxn short-comings?
At the next election why not vote for someone who will not bring shame on his constituents.

Leave it to scandal-mongers to dig up the dirt about "personalities" - a festival is for fun so let's enjoy it. Send silly politicians off to work for scandal magazines - they'll feel more at home.

46

margaret,

Australia(ex pat) 25/06/2006 00:00:00

Simon

The fact that Sir Sean doesn't live in Scotland is irrelevant, more important is what he has and still does for Scotland is what should be the main fact.
He is solely responsible for setting up the Scottish Widows fund and contributes on an annual basis,in fact he donated the entire amount of royalties of one of his movies.

Its interesting that you dont say where you are from
.... so when you talk about courage where is yours?
Finally, "opinions are like assholes, we all have one so dont need yours"

47

DannyL,

North Wales 25/06/2006 00:00:00

(Through the chair as they say!) There is only one problem with Connie's post no 52, that of agendas. Violence against women may not be the topic du jour... yet. However.. there is a long established piece of advice given to trainees on selling courses: if losing the argument try to shift the emphasis. I think this is what the Holyrooders in this little mini-drama are trying to do. Whether Sir Sean ends up a whipping-boy or a role-model as a by-product is of no concern to them, as long as they can seize the agenda. Sir Sean imo has exercised the sensible-enough judgement not to allow himself to be used in such a way. My guess is (and we are all guessing) Sir Sean has rightly concluded there are plenty of other patsies in closer proximity to the chamber more than eager to lend theit face to any debate about violence against women.
Ironically, and it may be unthinkable to you, the raison d'etre of most politicians is first and foremost to take charge of events, with the implementation of policy a not-very-close second, so much so that whoever plays the 'domestic violence' card in parliament will in a way be exploiting battered wifes [him/her]self as a self-saver or a sound career move. Everybody's favourite James Bond has no need of this and should be credited with the commonsense to realise this.

48

DannyL,

North Wales 25/06/2006 00:00:00

American Connie of post 54. Bravo. Rest of the correspondents, read well the wisdom after the event of which so many of Connie's compartriots are in denial. She's right, on this side of the pond we are not far behind.

49

J.M.,

Fife 25/06/2006 00:00:00

Let me make it clear that I do not have a very high opinion of Sean Connery, either as an "eminent" Scot or indeed as an actor. He was probably the best Bond, but his subsequent performances are lacking in finesse and depth, relying, in the main, on his physical appearance and his amusing pronunciation of the letter "s". (Ally McCoist eat your heart out!) However he is a celebrity figure of note, and the pathetic attempt of politicians to enhance their own standing and profile by association with such a man, purely for political gain, rather than relying on the substance of their policies or demonstrable achievements of same, highlights their lack of political stature.

Incidentally recent "McConnellisms" include "diminition" instead of "diminution" and "specialism" instead of "speciality". Did anyone else notice?

50

arrakis,

25/06/2006 00:00:00

Wholeheartedly agree with John Miller. Where are all the Scottish politicians of any experience, education and parliamentary expertise - oh yes, Westminster!

Time they came home and sorted the mess out up here.

The language and discussion currently exemplified in the debating chamber does not reflect the excellent Scottish education available in my day. It's a shame that any Scot with half-a-brain and the ability to progress in just about any walk of life, has left or most definitely doesn't want to get involved in Scottish politics.

A

51

Dickie Bird,

Glasgow 25/06/2006 00:00:00

After it has been said and done, Sir Sean should not have pulled out of the debate. The best opportunity (in my opinion) to set the record straight on this matter has been missed. Domestic violence is not topic du jour. Having reached boiling point in Scotland, pictures of battered women graced front pages of Scottish newspapers Thursday. After attending a conference last wednesday. . "Beyond Booze and Blade" developing the state of violence in Scotland. . . frontline politics could do with a wee eye opener of truth about the matter instead of re-inventing the wheel (as is done in government circles). Perhaps domestic life in Scotland could be cleaned up just a tad.

52

Candide,

25/06/2006 00:00:00

The first rule of effective debate is, never bring up old issues. That tactic is only purposely used by the opponent with the weakest skill level. Sir Sean was right not to be baited into a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

Humans should never strike out in anger, but just the fact of being human and imperfect causes the behavior to occur. There is no adult alive who has perfect control of hormones (adrenaline, testosterone, estrogen, etc.) 100 percent of the time. If anyone says they do, then they are a liar! It is only aberrant behavior if it is premeditated, repeated, or takes more than a second or two to occur. That includes saying rude, hateful, or spiteful things.

Everyone changes, sometimes for the good sometimes not, nothing alive is static. Tastes change, social morays change, sometimes for the good sometimes not. Being petty has always been out of fashion, it causes wars and civil and domestic unrest. Being petty seems to wax and wane. Being civilized also seems to wax and wane. I am from America, being petty, uncivilized and morally superior are seen as virtues here, it is called Political Correctness. It is sophistry, euphemisms and self deception; nothing more. It is a complete disaster!
If you like the thought of children burdened with the responsibility of making all the decisions in a household instead of being able to enjoy their innocence; be PC. If you don’t mind all of your males being emasculated to advance the cause of other groups by all means; be PC. (Though, since we import almost all of our actors from your part of the world, I guess I shouldn’t comment on that one.) If it is alright for people who, render their environments uninhabitable, to move into your environment and render it uninhabitable; then be PC. If you want your workers so over burdened just trying to feed their family’s that they don’t have the time or energy to keep an eye on the politicians; then you need to be PC.

If on the other hand,

53

Virgil,

Troon 25/06/2006 00:00:00

Sean Connery is a good actor. He is also Scottish born. He lives in another country.
Pays no taxes in the UK. Visits Scotland on invitations and enjoys the freebees he receives as he exploits native culture. His former wife started all this by disclosing that Sean slapped her and threw her to the floor and asking him to participate in an open forum on Violence Against Women will let skeletons out of the closet.
It's normal for him to steer away from the discussion. He will still visit Edinburgh for the Film Festival and not pass up another chance to dip his snout in the pork-barrel.
It's tax free. I still maintain that Sean Connery is a good actor.

54

Simon,

25/06/2006 00:00:00

Margaret, Australia.

"The fact that Sir Sean doesn't live in Scotland is irrelevant". that must be one of the silliest things I've read in ages. He is the SNP's largest sponsor yet has not lived or paid taxes here for decades, how can he know what its like in Scotland, he left here for the States years ago.
If you'd been able to fully understand my comment then you would of picked up on the four indirect references to my country. There are a further two in this post.
Critisising a comment is fine, insulting the comments author speaks volumes about the writer.

55

Kilted_kangaroo,

Sydney, Oz 25/06/2006 00:00:00

Far out! Scots really are small fish in an even smaller pond. I'm glad there is noting more serious to talk about or more interesting. Hang on........."go the Soccoroos!" That's the Australain football team who are in the World Cup finals in Germany. Come on, you can remember when Scotland used to have a team that competed at world level..............can't you?

56

Dr. Likiak,

Malta 25/06/2006 00:00:00

I have known media interviewers who, at the behest of politicians in power, would shed appropriate behavior if in doing do they could increase their ratings.
As for women getting slapped by men, ell, in this instance why is there no indication of what the woman did to provoke that response, or is it expected that a man should never strike a woman no matter how she humiliates him?

57

MSMD,

Philippines 25/06/2006 00:00:00

O wad some Power the giftie gei us
To see oursels as others see us!
John Miller/Fife expresses my current thinking and the majority of the other comments indicate why serious political concerns seem to be a thing of the past in Scotland.

58

Wee Geordie,

Toronto 26/06/2006 00:00:00

Thank you Richard; after all that flapdoodle you have hit the nail on the head. Is Canada the last bastion of common sense?

59

bridget,

London 26/06/2006 00:00:00

Thank you Richard (No.58). I thought no one would see the woods for the trees. Diane who? Did anyone know who she was when the book was published? How long were they married for - 10 years? Only one incident in that time? Not recurrent abuse then? Reported to the police was it? I am sure the comment made her a few quid at the time so it served its purpose, eh Di?

60

Bradley W,

Princeton 26/06/2006 00:00:00

I am so ashamed of many of the posters here today. So may claims are based on pop culture crap (yes, Crap) and Sir Sean once again attached for standing up for himself.

As one who attended Church services with Sir Sean in 1999 before walking to the opening of the SP from St. Giles, proud of what he so badly prayed for every day, a Devolution for Scotland, and he has done Scotland Proud. As for his knighthood, as he told it to me, he first accepted the scottish Thistle knighthood first and refused the queen's request to knight him until after "Scotland is Free Again!: and he dis so.

Connery is a brand as much as he is an actor and he has to use it where it makes sense for him. As for myself, born in scotland and raised in america, I have never been more proud of my heritage, Sir Connery has made it his personal crusade to make Scotalnd free again, much of it out of his own pocketbook. Whether I live there, or Sir Connery does, is not the point. To many are so fast to be critical because they do not know the man, and think they know the pop icon of film. Crap again.

I wish I was as able to give so freely of my time, my pledge, of Scotland but I do what I can, even from America.

As a parting note, did anyone make such a dour insult because Ian Fleming did not live in the UK and yet was so supportive of the UK? He lived in the West Indies, where he penned his great works!)

61

Virgil,

Seattle 26/06/2006 00:00:00

Mr Gow from #62 sounds like an expatriate Scot at a Burns' Supper.What balderdash. Read Walter from Troon #50.
As a literary buff might I enquire, what "great" works can be attributed to author Ian Fleming? Good stories I concede but "great" works, tut tut! Like Walter I too agree that Sean Connery is a good actor.

62

Torchwood,

Aberdeen 26/06/2006 00:00:00

Dear oh dear. How very sensitive of Sir Sean. If the remark was not not true he would have had an ideal opportunity to deny it.

However, his judgement has been up the creek before.

Some years ago Connery was not helpful to the Scottish Whisky industry by accepting several million dollars advertising Japanese Suntory whiskey (reported widely at the time and from time to time ever since).

He also donates to the SNP while he does not in the main live in the UK.

63

RAV,

canada 26/06/2006 00:00:00

SHE (AFTER A DIVORCE) SAID HE SLAPPED HER, HE SAID "THERE ARE WORSE THINGS YOU COULD DO..", SO WHERE DO WE SEE ANY PRIOR OR SUBSEQUENT PATTERN OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN? ONE MOMENT OF ANGER THAT RESULTED IN ONE SLAP IS NOT THE WORST THAT EITHER PARTY CAN DO IN A MARRIAGE. NOT CORRECTING THE BEHAVIOUR OR ENDING THE RELATIONSHIP WOULD BE WORSE. THE MARRIAGE ENDED, SHE HAS NOT CLAIMED THAT HE EVER DID WORSE TO HER, OTHER WOMEN HAVE NOT COME FORWARD WITH ACCUSATIONS OF SIMILAR OR WORSE BEHAVIOUR SO HE SEEMS TO HAVE CORRECTED THE BEHAVIOUR. SO WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

64

AF Vet,

Poulsbo, Washington, USA 27/06/2006 00:00:00

I would only comment on the state of the politicians in our countries. Burns Night aside, I do not condemn Sean Connery. I would, however trade Scotland's politicians straight across for the totally incompetent worthless administration we have in this country. I'll even throw in our non-president's worthless brother from Florida. (Non-president: He was appointed by our Non-Supreme Court the first election and bagged by rigged computer based voting machines in 2004). Please let us know if we have a deal...


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.