Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 21st August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

BBC told to stump up £400k for faking competitions on air



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 July 2008
THE BBC has been hit with a hefty fine for faking competitions on television and radio.
The corporation has been made to pay £400,000 by media regulator Ofcom.

It is a record fine for the BBC and relates to the broadcaster misleading audiences by staging phone-in competitions on shows such as Comic Relief and Children In Need and ann
ouncing fictitious winners at the end of them.

Sport Relief was also listed as one of the offending programmes, as were radio shows by Jo Whiley and Russell Brand.

The regulator found that the competition rigging was of a "very serious" nature, adding that in some of the cases mentioned programme-makers knew the entrants contestants wouldn't have any chance of winning, but pressed ahead regardless.

"Ofcom considered that these breaches of the (broadcasting) code were very serious," the watchdog said. "In each of these cases the BBC deceived its audience by faking winners of competitions and deliberately conducting competitions unfairly.

"The investigations found that, in some cases, the production team had taken premeditated decisions to broadcast competitions and encourage listeners to enter in the full knowledge that the audience stood no chance of winning.

"In other cases, programmes faced with technical problems made up the names of winners.

"Overall, Ofcom found that the BBC failed to have adequate management oversight of its compliance and training procedures to ensure that the audience was not misled.

"Although viewers and listeners paid the cost of their calls to take part in these competitions, the BBC did not receive any money from the entries."

A member of the production team posed as a winner on a phone-in competition on Comic Relief on BBC1 in March last year, and a similar scenario featured on a Sport Relief phone-in in July 2006.

On Children in Need, in 2005, the name of a fictitious winner was read out on air.

Earlier this year ITV was hit with a record £5.67 million fine for the abuse of premium rate lines on shows including Ant And Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway.

GMTV, which is 75 per cent owned by ITV, was fined a previous record of £2m.

In July last year, the BBC was ordered to pay a then unprecedented £50,000 fine over a Blue Peter phone-in scandal in which a young studio guest posed as a competition winner.

Channel 4 was also fined £1.5m for misconduct involving phone-in competitions on Richard And Judy and Deal Or No Deal.

the BBC said: "Ofcom has recognised that neither the BBC nor any member of staff made any money from these lapses."





The full article contains 449 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 July 2008 1:05 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Cynicaltalk,

30/07/2008 13:55:53
Stump up £400 000 of licence payers money.............
2

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 30/07/2008 14:56:10
1. Exactly.

It's the taxpayer that is stumping up here and that is our money, extracted from us under the constant threat of fines and jail.

The BBC won't be giving a flying farce about it, it's nothing compared to Johnathon Ross's £16 million contract...is it?
3

Vincent-W,

30/07/2008 15:03:23
The biggest loser is the future credibility of the once revered BBC. The culprits have done incalcuble damage to the reputation of the BBC.
4

Abel Magwitch,

30/07/2008 16:33:26
As an Irishman might say, if Lord Reith were still alive he would have been turning in his grave.
5

Friar Tuck,

30/07/2008 18:30:24
Why is it that public corporations get huge fines that don't mean anything? This money comes from the public, the people who pay for their TV licences! It's about time (I've said this before) that the executives of these public companies were held personally responsible for their corporation's actions. They are the ones who should be fined or imprisoned, not the taxpayer who has no control over this!

I am required, by law, to purchase a TV licence which pays for the BBC. This, apparently, is their only source of revenue. Now my money is being used to pay a fine! This is simply a transfer of money from one government agency to another!
6

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

30/07/2008 22:30:51
The EN forgot to mention them faking the vote to name the Blue Peter cat.

We should all take our revenge on Auntie Beeb by paying our licence fee with counterfeit money.
7

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 31/07/2008 05:01:24
More to the point, why isn't anyone going to jail for what is, after all, a clear case of obtaining monies by deception? Fine the BBC by all means, but the person or persons in the decision making loop in these cases knew exactly what they were doing, and unless the just fell from the sky, knew full well that it was illegal. Why is the SFO not involved here?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.