Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 21st November 2009

The simple locker key that could have saved the Titanic from disaster

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
29 August 2007
IT WAS the key that could have saved the Titanic.
The simple item was for a locker that stored the binoculars in the crow's nest and was in the possession of a Scots officer who was taken off the luxury liner at the last moment.

In his haste, second officer David Blair forgot to hand the key over to his replacement and took it with him. As a result, none of the lookouts on board could use the binoculars, despite asking other officers for them.

Fred Fleet, a lookout who survived the disaster, later told the official inquiry that if the crew had had binoculars they would have seen the iceberg the ship struck sooner. When asked by a US senator chairing the inquiry how much sooner, Mr Fleet replied: "Enough to get out of the way."

The 95-year mystery has resurfaced after the key was made available for sale at auction. The key is being sold by Mr Blair's descendants, along with a postcard he wrote to his sister about his disappointment on missing out on the trip. The two items are expected to fetch up to £70,000.

Alan Aldridge, of auctioneers Henry Aldridge and Sons, who specialise in Titanic memorabilia, said: "This is one of the most important artefacts from the Titanic to have come to light.

"Mr Blair was the second officer who was in charge of the crow's nest and he had the key, which we believe was for the binoculars locker in the nest.

"A few days before the Titanic sailed, he was bumped off the ship, which probably saved his life. But he carried this key off with him and forgot to hand it to his replacement."

Mr Blair, of Broughty Ferry, who was 37-years-old at the time, sailed on the Titanic from Belfast to Southampton on 3 April, 1912. He was due to sail on the doomed vessel's maiden voyage to New York on 10 April, but was told he wasn't going after the White Star line transferred chief officer Henry Wilde to the ship.

Mr Fleet told the inquiry he remembered Mr Blair with binoculars on the Belfast-to-Southampton trip, but there were none for the trip from Southampton to New York.

Titanic historian David Brown said he was sceptical about whether the key could have made a difference. "I tend to doubt it. I don't think they would have locked them up or that the key was something they would have forgotten.

"Landsmen have this idea that if the guys had been staring through binoculars up in the crow's nest they would have seen the iceberg and there would have been no accident. Anyone who has been on watch duty knows that's not true."

He added that in 1912 British binoculars did not have coated lenses and would have worsened vision in low light.

Karen Kermuda, the vice-president of the Titanic Historical Society, said: "It wouldn't make sense to lock binoculars in a box when they need to be readily available."

COLLECTING MEMORIES


The 46,000-tonne Titanic struck an iceberg in the north Atlantic at 11:45pm on 14 April and sank at 2:20am on 15 April. Some 1,522 people drowned. Fewer than half that number survived.

The enduring fascination of the tragedy, and the stories of the victims and survivors, have created a minor industry both for those who study the ship's story and collectors of memorabilia.

Henry Aldridge and Son, the Wiltshire auctioneer, is offering David Blair's key and postcard in its September sale, as handed down by his descendants. The firm sells high-end Titanic and ocean-liner collectibles to a world-wide market. It boasts of holding the world record for a Titanic item. The post office keys of the ship's postmaster, Oscar Woody, sold for £101,000.

When the vessel struck, Mr Woody and his crew, who were celebrating the veteran postman's birthday, rushed to the mail room to try to move 400,000 letters to a higher deck.

None survived, but the keys were recovered from Woody's body and given to his widow.

The previous record was held by a miniature portrait retrieved from the ocean, which sold for £58,000. The portrait belonged to passenger Helen Churchill Candee, travelling to America to see her son.

The US authoress gave the miniature of her mother to a friend as the ship was sinking because she had no pockets, but went on to survive.

Next month's sale includes an "extremely rare Titanic launch ticket", expected to fetch £10,000 to £15,000.

There is also an RMS Titanic onboard postcard sent by a third-class passenger, Henry Olsen, which is expected to sell for a similar amount.

In recent auctions an onboard letter written by first class passenger Alfred Rowe sold for £28,000.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 August 2007 8:15 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Titanic
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 29/08/2007 00:40:11

We are all fond of "For want of a nail..." theories and some are actually true but really, in this case do you not think they would have just broken into the locker for the binoculars if they were considered that important?

2

Navvy,

29/08/2007 00:55:37

Forget the key. What about the owner's parsimony which stopped the builder taking the watertight bulkheads right up to the main deck. This allowed them to be overtopped creating a cascade effect which eventually sank the ship. Had the bulkheads been full height the ship might have continued to float

3

Jon Bon Jovi,

29/08/2007 01:29:01

another rubbish scotsman story that belongs in the tabloids....

how the scotsman has fallen over the years....

4

Conan,

Here 29/08/2007 01:31:44

So, its Blair's fault again - can't you hate-the-US-Bush-Blair crowd give it a rest for once?

5

Suck--McCrunchie.,

http://www.stirlingpark.net for public contracts? 29/08/2007 03:03:53

4. Conan

But the sinking of the Titanic was obviously the work of terrorists.

6

Macuistean,

Isle of Tiree 29/08/2007 03:46:10

Is this a news item? Thankfully I only have a look at this "news paper" on line. What a load of rubbish and 95 years too late.

7

,

29/08/2007 04:12:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 914929, Article id was mapped to record!
8

Boy Wonder,

29/08/2007 05:51:20

What ... no news today? Because the relevance of this useless article escapes me completely.

(My partner just sad that's not the only thing!!! :-( )

9

Conan,

Here 29/08/2007 05:54:24

#5 - Sucker - you are such an eejit.

Of course it was not terrorists.

It was a direct result of global warming in 1912 that caused the Arctic Ice Sheet to break up and resulted in the collision with the very poorly Captained ship.

This is the same global warming scare that was predicted to raise sea levels by tens of feet by the 1920s. Instead, we got the dust bowl and drought, no sea level rise, an increase in the size of the polar ice sheets and so on. In other words - these so-called scientist have absolutely no idea what the are talking about and only an idiot will listen to them and pay any attention - let alone get excited.

10

Conan,

Here 29/08/2007 06:28:24

In defense of the Scotsman I must point out that this innanity is apparently the work of none other than their 'Arts Correspondent'.

11

Captain Fantastic,

Anywhere but here 29/08/2007 06:38:51

#2 The Titanic's sister ship, the Britannic, was on the stocks in Belfast at the time Titanic sank. Britannic was rebuilt with full-height bulkheads and a double hull. She served as a hospital ship in WW1 and was struck by a mine in the Aegean Sea in December 1915. Despite all the precautions, she sank in 55 minutes - more than twice as fast than the Titanic. Like her sister, she could float with the first five compartments flooded, however, the watertight door to the sixth compartment was damaged in the explosion and couldn't close, so her fate was sealed. Her demise was hastened by the fact the most of her portholes were open to provide ventilation to her wounded soldier passengers. As for the Titanic, the iceberg ruptured the first six compartments, so she would have sunk anyway. Full height bulkheads may have kept her floating a little longer thus perhaps allowing the Carpathia to reach her. The cause of the deaths was insufficient numbers of lifeboats for the number of people carried.

12

donald,

weegieland 29/08/2007 06:44:22

Prefer the Sunday Post story.

'Titanic Sinks!' Dundee Man Drowned!'

13

St Andrew,

Edinburgh 29/08/2007 06:48:46

I hope the family will be making a donation to the RNLI as a gesture of sorrow to those who died as a result of their ancestors error.

14

Senga Jean,

29/08/2007 07:42:14

The key to this "story" lies in understanding that the Scotsman is no longer even a tabloid or a comic but just a printing test.

15

eestlane,

29/08/2007 07:52:26

Donald @13:

I always thought it was the P&J and "Aberdeen man lost at sea"!

16

jdships,

29/08/2007 08:03:43

1. Scullion, Canada

Say's it all
Was MN myself and know from experience that key's to locker's etc were often lost .
Never stopped us opening them if need be !!

Titanic stories of this type belong in the "tabloids" not a supposedly "quality newspaper "
Sad fall in standards methinks

17

Montford's Jaicket,

Shaky Peg 29/08/2007 08:10:42

#16 - you're completely wrong about the wonderful P&J; their front page headline was "Record price paid for ram at Turriff mart". The Titanic story, on page 7, where the "world news" always is, was headlined "Aberdeen man loses pocket watch at sea" with the sub-head of "Titanic sinks".

For real parochial journalism, though, the Dundee Courier's headline after Hurricane Katrina had devastated New Orleans takes some beating: "Dundee man survives devastation".

18

von-Scharnhorst,

Brandenburg Preußen (ex Bathgate) 29/08/2007 08:12:19

Another Blair that leaves the sinking ship. Wasn't made a Middle East "peace" envoy was he?

19

Media 1,

cape town 29/08/2007 08:13:59

Yawn.. how boring a story!

It sank, end of story

20

Montford's Jaicket,

Shaky Peg 29/08/2007 08:22:02

#19 - No, but he may have been given a job as chauffeur to Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

21

Sue,

fife 29/08/2007 08:34:45

oh great - Titanic sank - blame a Scotsman - yeah right then!

22

Country lad, oo aarh!,

an t-Eilean 29/08/2007 08:52:12

Oh dear! I sense a looming political disaster of TITANIC proportions - T. Blair forgot to hand the key over to G. Brown. Lifeboatman Alex Salmond to the rescue!

23

Antonine Plato,

Glasgow 29/08/2007 09:00:25

http://platosway.blogspot.com

HEY! Ok, so it's not new news but it's better than listening to the normal drivel about independence and referendums which makes me yawn most mornings...

24

Hugo, Ayrshire,

29/08/2007 09:30:21

Was there not at least one spare key for the binocular locker on board ship?

25

Suzi B,

29/08/2007 09:36:02

Over 1000 passengers and not one of the 1st class passngers carried binoculars that could have been borrowed in an emergency? I don't think so!

26

,

29/08/2007 09:37:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

Homo Sapiens,

29/08/2007 09:38:17

Where is the key to the editorial room at the Scotsman? Why isn't anyone doing anything to stop this kind of rubbish from appearing in Scotland's flagship paper? If this were a cartoon strip, or a cartoon magazine, maybe this story would have had some justification, but the silly non-story, about some crazy theory, is absolutely unacceptable in this paper.

For lack of editorial control and management the Scotsman has sunk to levels unknown before!

28

jennie,

inverness 29/08/2007 09:40:09

considering there are still festivals going on in Edinburgh not to mention the rest of the Highlands, surely the Arts Correspondent has better things to do with his time than write 1000 words on this non-story?
And Conan, it's not "global warming" any more, which is a very misleading title indeed, it's "climate change" - and this summer has got to be a symptom of that. We've had summers like this before but only after big volcanic eruptions elsewhere in the world. Stop using your car now, man!

29

PJ,

Edinburgh 29/08/2007 09:41:46

“It was the key that could have saved the Titanic!”

Seconds from disaster, which runs on the National Geographic Channel used state of the art forensic analysis and a groundbreaking experiment to reveal a hidden weakness in the construction of R.M.S Titanic.

It was pointed out in the programme that the Titanic’s shipbuilders, had been put under pressure to get the job completed quickly had it not been put together with weak rivets that caused its hull to rip apart on impact with the ice it would not have sunk as quick as it did.

The liner would have survived the collision long enough for most of, or even all, its passengers to be rescued if not for the fact that corners were cut to complete the ship on time but then again there were not enough lifeboats on board. The programme also mentioned the fact that the key for binoculars was not on the ship, but it was thought that a combination of the moon was not out, and the water was so still, it was very difficult to see the iceberg even with binoculars.

Also the iceberg that the Titanic struck was unusual in such a way that it was not white like most others the clear surface in effect reflected the dark night sky and water like a mirror, thereby making it a black object, almost impossible to see from a certain distance.

30

Dancer,

Edinburgh 29/08/2007 09:53:18

Was it realy the Titanic that sank? I recall reading a book about this and it would seem there was confusion (or worse) over if it was the original Titanic that went doen.

31

MtnKat,

29/08/2007 10:14:06

#31 PJ
As well as weak rivets it was determined that the high sulpher content in the steel destabilized in the artic temperatures and became brittle. British Steel.
Can't blame Lucas for this one. Pity, that.

32

MtnKat,

29/08/2007 10:15:29

oops, sulphur

33

'Hezza,

29/08/2007 10:23:51

I heard the key-master was an SNP man: SNP responsible for sinking of Titanic! News just in...

34

Beergut,

Embra 29/08/2007 10:49:42

That wasn't the same cupboard those deckchairs were in was it?

35

Brian Boru,

England 29/08/2007 10:53:41

// 33 Mtnkat

Who is Lucas?

36

The Honest Scot,

29/08/2007 11:44:30

Nice to see we're getting some new news today.

37

Cool,

29/08/2007 11:49:24

I feel a law-suit coming on....

38

Yummy Mummy,

Edinburgh 29/08/2007 12:06:30

If you all think this newspaper is so crap, then why do you keep reading it?

39

MtnKat,

29/08/2007 12:09:07

#37

electronics,etc....
'67 Series II gives me fits thanks to Lucas parts.

40

MtnKat,

29/08/2007 12:10:40

#40 Comic relief, free entertainment...........

41

neil f,

fife 29/08/2007 12:20:43

£70,000 for a key that would have saved 1,522 lives.

That's £45.99 per life.

Outrageous.

42

PJ,

Edinburgh 29/08/2007 12:41:36

#32

Your are talking about the conspiracy theory that the ship that hit the iceberg was in fact the Titanic's sister-ship R.M.S Olympic, disguised as the Titanic. All part of an insurance scam of huge proportions by the White Star Line. I like the other one that the ship was cursed, as it allegedly carried the mummy of the Princess of Amen-ra on board.

Another theory said that the bottle of champagne used in christening Titanic did not break on the first try, which in sea lore is said to be bad luck for a ship. In fact, Titanic was not christened on launching, as it was White Star Line's practice not to do so.

43

Faye,

29/08/2007 12:49:51

#3 Easy to moan, but did you pay to read this news forum?

Was the key for the Olympia or the Titanic? What is really at the bottom of the sea? An insurance scam or for real?

http://olyblog.net/blog/stevenl/olympias-anna-sjoblom-sur...

44

Märiö äntoinette,

29/08/2007 14:15:58

If she hadve moved a little bit of her fat ass , poor jack wouldnt have drowned of the cold.

45

Bill Arnold,

Indianapolis USA 29/08/2007 15:24:58

#18 - My great-aunt's Scottish husband used to say: "Titanic sinks - Caithness man presumed drowned." Damn. I thought he originated that! Ha ha ha ha!!

46

martin, Surrey,

godalming, surrey 29/08/2007 16:43:16

The most obvious thing to have done, would have been proper heeding of all the ice warings that were received, each one of which was acknowleged by Captain Smith., and a reduction in speed.
Here in Godalming is the largest individual titanic memorial in the world, dedicated to John George Jack Phillips of Godalming, Surrey, who was the senior radio operator.
The weytherspoons here, is also named after hin.

47

Silence of the Yamz,

29/08/2007 17:25:48

If that geezer had left his keys Kate Winslett would still be doing TV drama on BBC, and James Cameron would be shooting Aliens 5. Shame!

48

The Fly Fifer,

FIFE 29/08/2007 17:44:17

12 RUBBISH there were plenty life boats many left the ship with only a few people in them ...........

49

tom, HR6,

29/08/2007 19:12:40

The Titanic sank for several reasons and it is just possible that the lack of binoculars in the crow's nest that night might have been part of the problem.

However, there are many other factors.

The Titanic was NOT the supership she was made out to be. She was a thoroughly conventional design except she was very big. Her rudder was too small for her size and propulsion capabilities so steering was slow. On the night of the collision with the iceberg the order astern, ie engines into reverse, was given which made the rudder even more ineffective. If she had continued at her speed unimpeded she might just have responded to the hard-a-port order and avoided the iceberg.

Also she was ahead of her time insofar as these large 'four-stackers' were capable of well over 20 knots without the technology, eg radar, to see ahead of themselves and had to rely on crew members in the crow's nest for forward vision. On the night in question the temperature was at freezing point so it is likely the crew in the fully exposed crow's nest would not have been on full alert

The weather conditions that night were unfavourable in other ways too.. There was no wind and no sea swell and it was pitch dark so there were no distant tell-tale swell signs of an object ahead such as an iceberg.

Unfortunately, too, the thing at the time was to beat records and Capatain Smith was not helped by having Bruce Ismay, White Star Chairman on board who would be anxious for his new ship to beat records.

50

tom, HR6,

29/08/2007 19:24:53

#51 I normally agree with your posts but I think you will find that even if all the places had been taken on the lifeboats the casualty list would still have been in excess of 1000.

Further points:-

Titanic was rushed into service with only minimal sea trials in Belfast Lough and in the Irish Sea only as far south as the Isle of Man

The crew was largely new and had little knowledge of the layout or performance of the ship

She was bulit of steel which by current standards was quite sub-standard, Rather than flex under pressure it shattered like a ceramic plate. The actual damage to the Titanic was only a matter of several square feet but this was spread over several watertight compartments. The iceberg did not, according to fable, create a gash - it popped some rivets and shattered some steel plates and that was enough to flood and overflow the internal watertight compartments

The fundamental design was flawed. The Brittanic incorporated the so-called lessons of the Titanic but she too foundered despite 'improvements' to watertight compartments etc

At the end of the day if she had been captained and steered more cautiously and if the crew had paid some proper attention to wireless warnings she might not have collided fatally with an iceberg. Man again thinking he is better than nature!!!

51

California Scot,

29/08/2007 20:09:14

Tom, yer taking all the fun out of this...........

52

parryisle,

Palm Beach, Florida 29/08/2007 21:53:29

author James Jones in his novel based upon his experiences during the attack on Pearl Harbor tells of a zealous soldier who refused to unlock the weapons storage locker until aurhorized by an officer. The troops simply pushed him aside and broke into the locker to arm themselves. steve, USN, WW2

53

Dunnie,

29/08/2007 22:10:02

As a young Midshipman in the Canadian Navy, I was trained to stand watch in every division/department of my ship (in the finest tradition of the Royal Navy), a River Class Destroyer - HMCS Mackenzie.

It was drummed into our thick skulls that upon turning over your lookout watch, you first briefed your relief on any contacts and their bearings then you turned over your binoculars and reported that the bridge lookout (port or starboard) had been relieved and who that person was.

I agree with many of the postings that this must have been a slow news day. The Scotsman, sometimes it is just best to say nothing.

54

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 29/08/2007 22:13:58

Muslims reckon it was a Goldberg that sank the Titanic. Not an Iceberg,

55

Kipling,

South of the border 29/08/2007 22:18:28

Would anybody be interested in a piece of genuine Titanic iceburg ? Every now and again a member of our family has thought of auctioning it, but over the years its size has dwindled such that it now occupies only the freezer and we've been worried that it would melt in the journey to the auction room in the present 'climate change'. Giving the phrase 'Going, going, gone...' a new meaning.

To quote from my treasured encyclopaedia, and to garner a new respect for ice, I quote "These wanderers of the sea overwhelm the onlooker with their beauty. Over their dazzling surface of solid ice, tints of delicate green mingle with blazing sapphire veins, contrasting with the deep dove-coloured caverns carved by the hungry waves, and, at dawn and sunset gleams of purple, azure and rose colour the scene". How lucky those passengers were to have had such an exciting encounter! If I may continue the quote, "As they drift along, now and then breaking, turning, sloughing off great fragments with a tremendous crash, many of them assume fantastic shapes -- like castles, triumphal arches or domed mosques." It's a pity they didn't have digital cameras then, let alone a pair of binoculars !

56

Dunnie,

29/08/2007 22:27:59

#58 - Rudyard - Riki Tiki Tavi Mongoose is gone.

Do yourself a favour - and us - place that Titanic piece of ice on your head.

If you don't, I'll give you 10p.

57

JC,

Deepest Kent 29/08/2007 22:28:44

They shouldn't be selling this memorabilia as I believe there is a Titanic Society that tries to prevent people profiting from this disaster directly. It was a tragedy that should be remembered and is not for making money from.

58

just chat,

london 29/08/2007 22:31:06

5# YES RIGHT DIDN'T BUSH SAY THE MURDEROUS IRANIANS? here is his "REAL" excuse to bomp/invade iran!
bush is "right" again cast iron "evidence" against Iran on the bottom of the sea, now what can you say about it sceptics?

god bless adolf bush the greatest leader since "george" Hitler,

America don't need enemies not with bush in power

59

Dunnie,

29/08/2007 22:35:45

60 and 61 - oh my, just witnessed a site do a Titanic.

60

truthsleuth,

SouthoftheBorder 29/08/2007 22:53:32

Bl##dy hell I the key I've just fetched out of my draw I bought off a fellow who claimed he was in the Crows nest on the titanic and this was the other key that locked the cupboard that held the key to the cupboard that held the binoculars ....


Its worth a fortune.

61

Billy Mac,

Australia 29/08/2007 23:03:58

I don't suppose the auction house that is selling this key will be getting a huge cut of the sale proceeds!! Maybe they are the ones who dreamt up this remarkable tale.

62

Dunnie,

29/08/2007 23:14:56

Ok. 15p.

63

EagleEye,

USA 30/08/2007 00:06:20

I read with interest the comments in the article from the Titanic experts who questioned why the binoculars would have been stored in a locker when they should have been readily available.

Isn't Titanic expert David Brown, who is also quoted as stating that the binoculars would have worsened vision at night, also the author of 'The Last Log of the Titanic' in which he claimed that the lookouts saw the iceberg well before the collision but said nothing because they didn't know what it was? If they saw the iceberg so early why would they need the binoculars readily available?? I guess Fleet figured the rising image of the berg in the North Atlantic in April must have been a navigational buoy. Fleet, who actually used 1912 binoculars at night before, was in a better position than Mr. Brown to know if they would have helped. He said they would have.

It made good sense to lock up the binoculars when they weren't in use. That assured they were there when needed. When Blair inadvertently walked off with the key what were they to do? Breaking the lock, if possible, as one of the above posters suggested probably sounded like a great idea--after they hit the iceberg. Hindsight is 20-20.

64

MichScot,

USA 30/08/2007 04:22:40

It's just filler. They do the same thing here...

65

Polaris,

30/08/2007 17:34:40

I love all the speculation that the binnoculars wouldn't have been in a box and there wouldn't have been a key? WHY THE HECK NOT? Other things were locked up on the ship. You know, those little things that go missing all the time. Why not lock up expensive binnoculars?
Karen Kermuda, the vice-president of the Titanic Historical Society, said: "It wouldn't make sense to lock binoculars in a box when they need to be readily available."
Why says? They lock keys in a box behind the door just to unlock it to get out the key that will lock the door.
None of us were there. It may or may not have happened. The more important thing is that the Titanic went down and took a lot of people with her. They're what (who) should be remembered. The rest is a moot point now.

66

Deana,

30/08/2007 19:44:05

Oh man....I just can't get past the irony of a locked cupboard in a CROW'S NEST!!!! I mean, who is going to be strolling by and likely to steal the binoculars? And if the few who are entitled to use them, inadvertantly take them down with them, duhhhh....it wouldn't take long to retrieve them, surely. If, and only if, the binoculars would've made a difference, then the bureaucratic numpties who locked them up caused the sinking.

67

martin, Surrey,

godalming, surrey 30/08/2007 20:38:38

53, if the titanic was built of sub standard steel that shattered like ceramic, howcome the wreck is till in existance today ? the forward section survived a 2 mile plunge to the bottom , hit the sea bed at speed, which presumabley according to post 53, the hill would have shattered completley, suggest you read Robert Balard who found the Titanic, on that point.
No proper sea trials, she underwnt sea traisl with board of trade representitives on board.
Rushed into serice ? her entry into service was delayed by repairs having to be carried out to the olympic.
In 1996, it was shown that the actual iceberg damage extended over an area of only 12 sq feet. however this was far below the water line and extended to the first 5 compartments.She could float with the first 4 compartments flooded, but not 5, because the watertight bulkhead between comparts 5 and 6 extended only as high as E deck.The weight of water in the bow would pull her down by the head, thus causing flooding water to overflow into compartment 6 and so on at an increasing rate until she sank, which is what happend.
Proper heeding of all the ice warings, a reduction in speed would have prevented such a disaster.If the iceberg had been sited 30 second sooner , she could have avoided it, or 30 seconds later, would have ment fewer forward compartments would have been breached, or even to have hit the iceberg head on, she would not have sunk.
Then of couse, if the Californian's cap[tain , Stanley Loed, had got out of his bunk a few miles away, then things again would have been very differnt, such is history.

68

martin, Surrey,

godalming, surrey 30/08/2007 20:41:21

captain of the leyland line, ship, calafornian, Captain Stanley Lord, severley critisied by both the senate and board of trade inquires, for the complet inactivity of his ship on the night of 14/15th April 1912.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.