Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th December 2009

Forensics team closes in on Culloden graves

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 April 2006
THE BATTLE of Culloden – described in countless of books – still has an unfinished chapter in its 260-year-old story.

The battlefield south-east of Inverness is now dotted with a number of stone memorials to the dead. The monuments pay tribute to the thousand or two clan members who died in battle. The Well of the Dead, to name one memorial, honours Alexander MacGillivray of Dunmaglass, whose Clan Chattan forces breached the first line of the British government defences before he was killed.

What is still missing after all these years, however, is a suitable acknowledgement of the government forces who died and a precise account of where they are buried. While the Jacobite army consisted mainly of Scots Highlanders, the government side was comprised of English as well as Scottish troops. In fact, three of the 15 government infantry regiments fighting that day under the Duke of Cumberland were Scottish.

However you look at the battle - whether you are English or Scottish, Irish or Welsh - there are justifiable reasons to honour all men who sacrificed their lives. Culloden was not only a battlefield, it was a burial ground to many on both sides of that moorland.

It is of particular interest to both the National Trust for Scotland, managers of the historic site, and to specialists in the area of battlefield archaeology such as Tony Pollard, who want to offer a more balanced representation of the event in 1746. And whilst Scottish clans made efforts to remember the fallen, it so far cannot be said of those lost among Cumberland's men.

"I think there is greater need to be doing some form of investigative work on British [government] army graves," says Pollard, project manager for Glasgow University Archaeological Research Division and lead research-investigator of the Culloden battlefield. "At the moment we have several facets of the evidence which suggests where the graves are within the Field of the English - between 40 and 50 men."

There is only one stone memorial to the government - "Field of the English: they were buried here", it reads starkly - but no exact location of graves or trenches has ever been registered. Government casualty figures – those who were killed in action or injured – total around 360 but there is less certainty on the number who died.

"It's not unusual for a victorious side to play down its losses and play up those of the enemy," says Pollard. "So there might actually had been less Jacobites killed in the battle and more British soldiers killed. So one of the interesting things to do is to determine how many men are buried."

Pollard and his team of forensic archaeologists have uncovered new evidence that might point to the location of a larger gravesite. He recounts a recent discovery and what the finding may mean:

"We actually found this silver coin, a German Thaler. It doesn’t relate to the battle as such; it's dated 1752. I have little doubt that it was dropped by a British soldier who'd seen service on the Continent … and had come back to visit the graves of his fallen comrades, probably while they were still marked with low mounds before they got ploughed out," Pollard says.

"I think, literally, that is an 'X' that marks the spot. I think there's a good chance we have actually tied down the position of those graves. It's not unusual to leave some form of offering for whatever personal reasons. And I think we can safely say that that German silver coin was left deliberately rather than dropped."

Literally hundreds of pieces of evidence have been unearthed from the top layers of the battlefield since Pollard's team began their investigation six years ago. He is closer than ever to finding the government graves – presumably a mass grave – and you can hear the excitement in his voice as he describes the slow unravelling of the mystery.

"One of our tasks throughout has been to locate this unmarked grave," Pollard says. "We did geophysics as part of our survey and came up with a number of anomalies – one of which looks quite regular, quite square and could be a grave."

As a national historic site with government protections, Pollard understands the importance of working carefully and with a high level of decency as to not upset the graves once found.

"I respect the fact that those graves are a place of pilgrimage. The graves are a scheduled monument and they are protected by law," he says. "But that doesn't mean to say that I think we shouldn’t be digging graves. There are places there that I think we should be investigating."

Pollard says that, with further work conducted by his team, there is a need to offer an accurate account of the event and aftermath.

"It would allow us to pinpoint that site and mark it accordingly and give it the same degree of reverence and memorialisation as has been the case of the Jacobites. The British soldiers have served their time and they deserve it."



  • If you enjoyed reading this, you may want to read:
    Amazing discoveries, 250 years after Culloden

  • Page 1 of 1

    • Last Updated: 17 April 2006 4:36 PM
    • Source: scotsman.com
    • Location: Scotland
    • Related Topics: Will Springer
     
    1

    Mac Mhic Raonuill,

    Edinburgh 10/06/2006 00:00:00

    The story of Mr Pollard's quest is typical of the arrogance of some of the historians who have tried to enhance the image of the Butcher Cumberland and his band of English/German henchmen under his command. Some of them died when face to face with Highland warriors, but they were few and far between, of those who were those Highland Scots whoere barbarously slaughtered after the battle was over, hence the small dimension of the marker for the enemy. To try to do this as Mr Pollard suggests will evoke quite rightly an outcry by Scots world-wide. And to try make his suggestion admirable he tries to mask who was fighting who and why by calling the murderers British Government troops. Typical of the so called National trust of Scotland who are involved and who control most of our national heritage monuments and give a biased and distorted picture of the real reason why our Highlanders fought during the 1745 Rising. Note "Rising" not rebellion as it is often referred to by the other side.

    The real cause was to free our country from foreign usurpation ""It was always my greatest concern to see my race and lawful Sovereign, and if, such was the will of Heaven, to lose my life cheerfully in promoting it.I solemnly declare I had no view in drawing my sword in that laudable cause, but the restoration of the Royal Family and the recovery of the liberty of these unhappy islands : now too long oppressed with usurpation, corruption and bribery ; being sensible that nothing else but the King's return could make our country flourish under all ranks and degrees of men, and recover Church and State from these too many dismal consequences naturally flowing from revolutionary principles".

    Signed "Donald MacDonald"

    Saturday Ye 18 October 1746.

    N.B Part of Major Donald MacDonald of Tir na dris 1st cousin of the Keppoch MacDonald Chief Alasdair MacColla ( That Mirror of Martial Men ) The Chief died at Culloden leading the MacDo

    2

    john,

    Texas 11/06/2006 00:00:00

    Aye, Alasdair! I've no love for the English. They needent be muckin around Culloden, tryin to salvage their blinken image. either.

    3

    Dennis L.,

    Beijing China 11/06/2006 00:00:00

    Please explain your use of "of" between countless and books, as pasted here.THE BATTLE of Culloden – described in countless of books – still has an unfinished chapter in its 260-year-old story. Is it not redundant,
    un-needed and superfulous?
    Dennis Lowrimore, American of Irish, German, Russian and Cherokee ancestry
    .English teacher in China.

    4

    Deborah,

    California 11/06/2006 00:00:00

    I had to leave pc for a minute before i wrote this! So many emotions running through my heart and soul! I agree with John.....Aye Alasdair and Aye again!I am not totally unfeeling for some of the Britsh who fought during the "45 some had no choice, but at Culloden, and after, they by orders of @%#*&@ cumberland, raged over Scotland, burning, killing,and destroying everything and everyone they could find.( the "45 has always been one of my major rants, and painful, but at the same time so proud of the Scots who stood and fought and died for Scotland) and i am very offended by them saying " 360 british died? " AND HOW MANY SCOTS WERE SLAUGHTERED???????!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am digusted! ok i am done ....for now! ( my grandpa was 1/2 Scot, 1/2 Irish, my grandma Scot, Irish and Native American...they all felt the attitude of the english " uncivalized barbarians" they were all called, so must be destroyed! .....but we still live...Aye? )

    5

    Fiona Duigan-McKay,

    Dunedin, New Zealand 16/04/2008 09:30:46
    As a descendant of the Macdonald clan whose ancestors were butchered by that German Nazi- Butcher Cumberland I feel that the english must keep their snout out of Scottish affairs. Another fact is that Bonnie Prince charlie was a cousin of the butcher. The trouble with Charlie was that he was an alcoholic.The sassenachs called the Celtic peoples barbarians but the only barbarians were and are the English. The trouble with the English is that they thought they owned the world and committed indignities on other indigenous people, e.g. Native Americans, Maoris in New Zealand and the Aboriginals in Australia. I also have Irish ancestry. Another thing that the english tried to do was to take away the indigenous peoples native language e.g. Maori in New Zealand and the Gaelic in the Celtic countries of which there are six.
    Btittany in France, Cornwall, Ireland, Isle of Man, Scotland and Wales.
    6

    Shuggie,

    Canada 16/04/2008 17:07:48
    I have always been perplexed by how many of those same Scots who fought against the Crown at Culloden fought for it against the American colonists. Flora McDonald's husband, for instance.
    7

    RonS,

    Mississauga 16/04/2008 17:32:15
    As a Canadian, of Scottish heritage, I was shocked when I visited Culloden to see the battlefield. My thoughts were how could the Scots agree to fight here, in a location the totally favoured the English style of fighting? They were outgunned by more modern arms and much higher firepower and so quickly paid the price. It was just like the first day of the Battle of the Somme when the German machine guns mowed down the Brits (and Canadians) like so much firewood. I thought - these guys were poorly led by a non-military leader and quickly paid the price. They were much more suited to guerilla warfare where sheer firepower is of less consequence.
    Only for the Scots, there was now second chance and history tell it's own tale.
    8

    Jeremiah,

    TUSCUMBIA 17/04/2008 05:03:55
    Most of the Scots who fought at Culloden--on either side--were old or dead by 1775. That plenty of Scots did go to America may be a reflection more on individual opportunity and escape from crushing poverty brought by the market revolution than any sense of loyalty. Further, many of the so-called highland regiments contained Irish, English, and even Americans as well as Scots. Only the 76th was a gaelic speaking formation. The rest didn't wear kilts much of the time, particularly the 71st (Fraser's) and the 42nd by 1781.

    For RonS, see Grady McWhinney's ridiculous 'Attack and Die' for an explanation. There may even be some truth lying there.

    As above, former Cpt, 71st Lt. Inf.

     

    Comment on this Story

     

    In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

     
     
     
      

     
     


    Sister Newspapers:
    Press Complaints Commission

    This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

    If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.