Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 21st November 2009

Prince Harry deployed to Iraq

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 February 2007
PRINCE Harry and his Army regiment are being deployed to Iraq in the spring, the Ministry of Defence confirmed today.
The 22-year-old, who is third in line to the throne, is to become the first royal to be deployed on a tour of duty in a war zone for a quarter of a century. His uncle, the Duke of York, was the same age as the prince when he flew helicopters in the F
alklands conflict in 1982.

Army officer Harry will join his regiment, the Blues and Royal, in southern Iraq as part of a long-planned rotation of troops. The length of their stay was not given but it would be expected to be about six months.

Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, confirmed the deployment this morning in a written statement to MPs.

Specifically, two squadrons from the Household Cavalry Regiment (HCR), of which Harry is part, will be deployed. The lead formation, currently 19 Light Brigade, will be replaced by 1 Mechanised Brigade, which the HCR will support. The rotation of troops will take place in May and June, the ministry said.

The news comes a day after Prime Minister Tony Blair outlined the first step in a phased withdrawal of British forces from the country with the return of some 1,600 troops within months.

Clarence House and the ministry said that the prince, a Second Lieutenant, would carry out a "normal troop commander's role". In this role Cornet Wales, as he is known in the military, will oversee 12 soldiers in light-armoured vehicles performing reconnaissance missions in the desert.

Military planners have privately expressed concern that the mere fact of the prince being in Iraq could itself attract terrorist attacks on British soldiers in the south of the war-ravaged country. They fear that insurgent groups would be drawn by the possible "cachet" of a successful attack on a member of the British Royal Family and that it would lead to more attacks on UK forces.

"Speculation about precisely where Cornet Wales will serve, or the exact details of his role, is potentially dangerous," a joint statement from Clarence House and the ministry said. The statement also urged "all media organisations to respect this matter of operational security in order that Cornet Wales can undertake a normal tour of duty."

Although the prince was branded a "wild child" by some when he was younger after admitting to smoking cannabis and under-age drinking, he went on to pass a gruelling, 44-week military officer training course at the Sandhurst military academy. He then became an armoured reconnaissance troop leader 4 1/2-month course at Bovington Camp in Dorset.

Cornet Wales learned the ins and outs of Scimitar tanks and armoured tactics and also trained on live firing ranges.
Last month, he joined members of his regiment on a training course that specifically prepares soldiers for conditions in Iraq.

"There is no way I am going to put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country," the prince said in 2005.

In addition to the Duke of York, Harry joins a host of other royal family members to have served in the British military. King George VI, then Prince Albert Duke of York, served as a naval officer during the Battle of Jutland in 1916. Prince Phillip, before he became Duke of Edinburgh, served in the British Navy during the Second World War, seeing action in the Mediterranean.

After Queen Elizabeth II, the line to the throne is headed by Harry's father and his older brother, Prince Charles and Prince William.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ricardo,

22/02/2007 12:59:29

Excellent.... Harry can help lead the retreat

2

Glock17,

Twin Cities 22/02/2007 13:08:02

At least Britain puts its leaders in harms way. As I understand it, the southerrn region where the Brits are in charge is more or less pacified. How is this a retreat?

3

Brett,

Maryland, USA 22/02/2007 13:08:10

I wonder if we would have gotten into Iraq so quickly if our leaders had to watch their children go to war.

4

CBH,

Washington, DC 22/02/2007 13:11:30

Good work. George Bush's embarrasing children haven't done a days work in their lives, much less military service.

5

clarence,

new mexico 22/02/2007 13:12:20

Best of Luck.

6

Law,

Bangalore 22/02/2007 13:28:15

Salute! it shows a Royal member can demonstrate loyaly to his country too

7

AJ,

Fife 22/02/2007 13:49:13

I wonder if he'll have to buy his own gear and borrow body armour?

8

Yank,

USA 22/02/2007 13:54:23

I hope you British now choose your officers based on talent and experience, not title and lineage as in the past. That said, I cannot understand why you still support Bush's failed policy, and send your youth to fight a war which is already lost. We Americans have to suffer this moron for 2 more years. The "troop surge" is seen here as no more than a delaying action, relieving "King George" of blame for the debacle. Our next president will have to order in the helicopters to evacuate Americans off the roofs of Baghdad. Do you really want to join them? Good luck, Harry. Just remember: You're NOT fighting for your country. You're fighting for a LIE!

9

Billy,

Germany 22/02/2007 14:20:45

Well as he is not a genuine royal, there has been no attempt from Buck palace to stop this deployment, as for his brother,
he will never get his hands dirty again.

ps. YANK # 8. On what bases does the american army choose their officers, whenever they are on the box they come across as thick as 2 short planks. US tactics in Iraq and Afganistan, would seem to back me up.

10

Zen,

US 22/02/2007 14:29:19

It is unfortunate that anyone's children should have to be there. I believe I would prefer it if Bush's and Chaney's children were there -it would seem more appropriate in some Karmic way. Harry and his unit belong safe at home in a world where profiteers do not create strife and discord to further their own ends (and I mean this in the broadest sense)

11

The other Jon,

USofA 22/02/2007 14:29:52

Obviously Yank is an idiot.
As an American I have never understood how the royal family worked. For me your lineage does not necessarily make you a good leader, but I see by his actions Prince Harry was born to lead. Thank you for being a staunch ally of America whether or not things are working out.

12

,

22/02/2007 14:31:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 391515, Article id was mapped to record!
13

Faye,

Scotland 22/02/2007 14:31:57

Princess Di produced the heir, are they now trying to get rid of the spare?

14

Boots,

Blackburn, West Lothian 22/02/2007 14:40:33

#12 what a cruel comment to make about anyone who has been sent to war. These men and women chose to be part of the army and they appreciate that they have a job to do regardless of whether it is right or wrong. Harry will have a tough time because of who he is and any parent would worry about their child, but especially with the publicity surrounding this child. They are all brave, regardless of hierarchy.

15

timlaine,

us 22/02/2007 14:45:52

"Prince Harry, who will be sent to fight on the front line in Iraq this spring, has been infatuated with tanks, uniforms and helicopters since his childhood"

Now, he can use them on real people .

16

Pompey,

Wales 22/02/2007 15:03:28

Thanks to every man and woman who takes it upon themselves to serve in the Armed Forces. And to do it when you could have spent your life living in luxury at everyone else's expense - to me that's quite a sacrifice. Good on him, and best of luck out there.

17

Wally,

Arizona 22/02/2007 15:44:03

Glock17 in #2:

I think you're mistaken about southern region being pacified. It was pacified back in April, 2003 right after invasion. but since then portions of the population in that region have decided to resist. The UK soldiers, like the US soldiers in other regions, are not in total control of the southern region. There's areas they stay out of even, just like in the other parts of the country - US soldiers have retreated from some areas.

18

Terry Mathis,

Goulburn NSW Australia 22/02/2007 15:50:42

Bah!, to all the grumblebums that know jack about duty, honour, country!

'Onya Harry for following a long line of commitment to the military by the Royals.

-Terry Mathis
Goulburn NSW Australia
dv8cowboy@bigpond.com (for the anonymous cowards posting)

19

knievel,

edinburgh 22/02/2007 16:02:01

#4 by george Bush's 'embarassing' children i assume u mean George bush senior

20

Terry Mathis,

Goulburn NSW Australia 22/02/2007 16:02:20

To 'Yank's Post' (Number Eight)

There are valid reasons for 'ugly Americans' to be referred to as 'Septo's down under.

I hold a dual Australian/U.S. passports and find your comments reprehensible and very ignorant.

-Terry Mathis

21

stellarossa,

Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 22/02/2007 16:08:14

Will be he allowed to wear his Nazi uniform?

22

Crickit,

Georgia-USA 22/02/2007 16:23:21

#8 I am an American and I am proud of it. There are things you don't agree with but you do not trash your country in a foreign country. You work to make things better.
#20 Thank you!

23

Wally,

Arizona 22/02/2007 16:40:41

Cricket in 22: you said "#8 I am an American and I am proud of it."

I'm sorry, I have to break with you Cricket. in your view we're not allowed to express disagreement with president? A little bit fascist for my tastes. General Casey was the top US Army commander in Iraq until he said in December that he thought the president's troop surge was a bad idea, when he said that he thought that no matter how many troops we put in Iraq that we would not prevail. So you would call General Casey a traitor?

Most Americans want to bring the troops home from Iraq. and you don't want the majority to prevail. and anyone who disagrees with the killing & death & destruction agenda you say is a traitor.

George Washington was a real American. He said that we should not involve ourselves in foreigners' business, that we should treat all foreign nations as friends, but not get too close to any of them. George Washington was a real American. George Bush is not. He is a traitor.

24

Boston John,

Boston USA 22/02/2007 17:26:28

#4: Thank you for stating the obvious. President Bush's daughters, like Chelsea Clinton, have no military track record. Laser sharp observation, must be the air in DC. The Bush family have provided military service to the US, especially President Bush Senior. And lest we forget, of course, the US military is choc full of Clintons (other than Bill who declined to serve, i.e. dodged it), the Kennedys, the Edwards, the Gores, the Carters, the Deans, the Pelosis, the Schummers, the Obamas etc etc. Wait a minute - no , it is not. In fact not a single member of these Democrats have family in the military. And of course, not one of this generation of the sainted Kennedy clan has served in the military in any way (unless you count drinking in military bars). You miss that point, I fear. So your argument is that like Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Clinton, President Bush Junior sent US troops into battle but not his own family. Ah, now I see your point, still don't agree with it.

25

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 17:33:34

"There is no way I am going to put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country," the prince said in 2005.

Yer, ar*e! "My Boys"? From a 21yo? "Put MYSELF" through sandhurst? No, the tax payers of UK put you through sandhurst, made dinner for you, put various rooves over your head, the clothes on your back. When you "put yourself" through something, You work, pay bills, pay tax first. Ar*e.

In addition to the Duke of York, Harry joins a host of other royal family members to have served in the British military. King George VI, then Prince Albert Duke of York, served as a naval officer during the Battle of Jutland in 1916."

--- there's been hundreds of the bug*ers scrounging from the tax payer since George IV. Not ethe word "host" in the above text. Grovelling `"reporter"....

Also, I am the only one to notice the final sentence of this report?

"After Queen Elizabeth II, the line to the throne is headed by Harry's father and his older brother, Prince Charles and Prince William."

The death knell sounds on the Scotsman's relevence in Scottish life. Just Queen Elizabeth will suffice in Scotland, no?

26

rbenevolo,

Brazil 22/02/2007 18:45:15

I disagree with the Iraq invasion by US and UK.
However, I have to congratulate with British Army decision to send Prince Harry to fight on the front line in Iraq.
Prince Henry would ask his grandmother’s influence to avoid his deployment but prefered follow his regiment, even knowing he could go back coffin dressed.
A great difference with George W. Bush military career, during the Vietnam war.
Senator Daniel K. Inonye (D-HI), a World War II veteran, is still waiting the Bush’s reply to his question on 2000: “The question is, where were you, Governor Bush?”
Good luck Prince Harry, good luck Iraqui “insurgents” too, all fighting by their countries.

27

scot yank,

usa 22/02/2007 19:19:42

GOOD SHOW HARRY
our prayers will follow you and all serving their country. the late queen mother's brothers served in battle, your uncle served the faulklands.

hold yer head high and do the right thing.

28

American,

USA 22/02/2007 19:32:29

JEEZ, CAN'T YOU PEOPLE JUST WISH THE GUY LUCK?

and #27- Are you sh*tting me- "good luck Iraqi insurgents"- are you that ignorant by not knowing that the insurgents are "PURPOSELY" blowing up Iraqi citizens. How sincere can your good luck to Harry be while wishing luck to Iraqi insurgents?

29

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 19:56:18

28 Scot Yank: "hold yer head high and do the right thing." - like make a public announcement that he:

a) Thinks such a 'war' isn't really a war, it's a brutal, illegal, occupation.

b) That he is giving up all rights to the 'throne' and will be getting a proper job, paying taxes and relinquishing his family forture (gained from theft).

c) That the "UK" military is heavily controlled by i)industry and ii) predominately English upper classes

Now, that would be the 'right' thing!

29 American: I think 27 was using irony.

30

Mario Antoinette aka lots of things,

22/02/2007 20:09:33

A PR Exercise, get people on the side of the war , the government and the royal family.

Its the oldest trick in the book (since The Pharaos) and it looks like you all fell for it.

He will not come within Ten Miles of any possible trouble.

31

maestra,

22/02/2007 20:18:17

Hey Boston John - precisely what military service did George W Bush provide to the US? (Best not to mention Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker's links with the Nazis, eh?)

32

maestra,

22/02/2007 20:19:12

And, by the way, dissent is patriotic. Living in Boston you should know that.

33

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 22/02/2007 20:44:13

#26 an 30 Finnking

I get this very faint impression that your not an ardent royalist...........hehe

34

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 20:48:34

34_ MAEB (Real Ale, cask conditioned version I hope!?)

Whatever gives you that idea? I love royalty. Take the silly hats away from them and teach then something about personal hygiene and they make perfect pets. Or cats' scratching posts. Or targets for spitting contests. No, no... they are very useful entities.

35

Castel,

US 22/02/2007 21:02:40

I don't necessarily agree with all the decisions the President makes but I don't slander him either. He's a person like everyone else and entitled to make mistakes. I dare say that most people would crack under the same pressure he deals with daily.

36

Someone with a life,

22/02/2007 21:37:13

34. Mine's an 80 bob, Edinburgh

Get a girlfriend or a hobby, so you don't waste other peoples time posting here every day.

37

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 22/02/2007 21:43:01

#35 Finnking

the only one, straight from the wee brewery up the road, cant wait for november to come round again and the make 'Campbell hope and kings' finest.

As far as the pets go, the lot that are in are more a case of queenie uber alles

38

JohnnyR,

New Zealand 22/02/2007 21:47:12

My only worry about Prince Harry's deployment is how many British soldiers might have to die to protect this "Boys Own" adventurer.

39

,

22/02/2007 21:54:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 392508, Article id was mapped to record!
40

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 21:55:19

MAEB: Are they still making Golden Promise?

41

Terry Mathis,

Goulburn NSW Australia 22/02/2007 21:58:16

[quote= Yank #8]Just remember: You're NOT fighting for your country. You're fighting for a LIE! [/quote]

He is fighting for God, Country, but most of all his TROOPS!

How dare you disrespect what Harry (Third in line to the throne) is doing because it is his duty and he wants to.

'Onya Harry. Where you are going may involve probes into 'Indian Country' for extended and dangerous probes. Harry mandated no interference from anybody including the Monarchy!

42

fergiewergie,

Chch, NZ 22/02/2007 22:02:14

Why do the press have to report this ? When he is in Iraq will he his own royal correspondant following him around ?

Fair play to him wanting to be on the front line. But reporting it in the press is basically handing out information to the enemy.

Like all our soldiers out there, I hope he comes back in 1 piece.

43

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 22:05:33

43: Terry: "He is fighting for God, Country, but most of all his TROOPS!"

You actually mean that?

God?

Country?

HIS troops?

Man alive, it's 2007!

44

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 22/02/2007 22:54:20

#42 Finnking

Oh yes, dont indulge the organic stuff much,
but I have been known to quaff more than a few deuchars of an evening

45

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 23:05:31

46: Master Mariner: "Property is theft" Standard Proudhon misquote? No, I believe that as a 'royal' he has NOT earned anything. From the day he was born he has been GIVEN everything. He is a parasite, in my humble opinion.

Just a wee word to you about life in the real world as a pleb: When I was 15 I wanted to join the army. I specifically wanted to go to Sandhurst and started to enrol at a feeder school - Wellbeck College. Off I went, full of eagerness, to the "UK" army recruitment office in Edinburgh, where I was told, explicitly, "You cannot enrol there because you have had a Scottish education."

As for Edward: what was the story? Why was he drummed out?

I rearely feel inadequate. As for the concept of serving: Why would I SERVE anyone? It makes no sense to me. A flag? An ill-defined Nation (tax zone)? A God? No, I will fight and give my life for freedom from all these things, things that are designed to oppress and control. Created to restrict your freedom. Freedom and equality: I will fight for that and that only.

You want me to feel good about some rich kid going off to kill people? Bizarre. Soldiers KILL people, that's what they do. Celebrate? No.

46

Finnking,

THe Republic Tax Zone of Finland 22/02/2007 23:14:20

Master Mariner: Also, the media in the "UK" will show endless pics of the parasite, demonstrating how 'glorious' war is and how 'brave' he is. They will glorify killing. You watch.

"until then you will remain feeling inadequate when compared to those who serve" ---oooh, the stupidity. "I serve my country" Bollox: you serve the industry that supports the country! War is Business by another name. Instead of wearing wee Union Jacks on the uniforms, just have adverts for Bechtel, Halliburton, Lockheed, Coca-Cola. Let them pay for it. Sell the video rights to PC games companies. Serve? Slave!

Freedom.

MAEB: Glad to hear it's still on the go. Sleep time! Night!

47

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 22/02/2007 23:23:51

#46 master-mariner

This will be the German/english monarchy you are talking about, you know, the house of hannover, from old George the first, the man who could not speak english right down to the lot we have today. ie: the present queen of England, Elizabeth the second who cant be Elizabeth the second in Scotland because we never had an Elizabeth the first. The one's the Scots had rammed down their throats. As far as I am aware Finnking is a Scot and as such has no need to show and respect for "the monarchy".

48

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 22/02/2007 23:25:27

#49 Finnking
enjoy, see you to anon

49

scot yank,

us 22/02/2007 23:27:15

finnking

the right thing???

stand up for what YOU believe
NOT your father
NOT your grandparents
both of whom i'm sure he'ld rather not be in harms way, however the lad has other aspirations. the only reason the media has made a statement on this is who he is.
my wishes go out not only to Harry but all young men and women who are serving their country despite their parents, siblings, spouses and the majority of their countries feelings.

The right thing is be a good soldier, which is what HE wants to be. Sandhurst gave this boy direction.

I have 2 children who, if had the desire, are eligable to serve. I won't press them either way. a decision like this is made in your heart not on in the tabloids.

50

fatboyslim,

scotland 22/02/2007 23:52:32

who cares about prince harry the monarchy is an english on not a scottish one.
when independence comes we will be shot of this out date institution and become a republic


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.